Hypothetical and Categorical Imperatives | |
| | |
The Argument from Relativity | |
| | |
The Argument from Queerness | |
| | |
Patterns of Objectification | |
| | |
4 | |
| | |
Observational Evidence | |
| | |
Ethics and Mathematics | |
| | |
5 | |
| | |
II The Logical Form of Inner Judgments | |
| | |
III Moral Bargaining | |
| | |
IV Objections and Replies | |
| | |
6 | |
| | |
Moral Diversity | |
| | |
Objective Values | |
| | |
7 | |
| | |
8 | |
| | |
III Moral Disagreement as a Metaphysical Objection | |
| | |
IV Moral Disagreement as an Epistemic Defeater | |
| | |
V The Causal Inefficacy of Moral Facts | |
| | |
VI Conclusion | |
| | |
9 | |
| | |
Part II | |
| | |
Introduction to Part II | |
| | |
10 | |
| | |
III Error Theories | |
| | |
IV Particular Cases and General Claims | |
| | |
V Conclusion | |
| | |
11 | |
| | |
III The Challenge Not a Form of Skepticism | |
| | |
IV The Interplay of Controversy and Contingency | |
| | |
V The Role of Reflection | |
| | |
VI Practical Solution to These Doubts? | |
| | |
VII Conclusion | |
| | |
12 | |
| | |
13 | |
| | |
The Gap between Intuitive Moral Judgment and Rational Action | |
| | |
14 | |
| | |
The Regress Argument | |
| | |
Permissively Justified Beliefs and Positive Support | |
| | |
The Nature and Role of Coherence | |
| | |
Some Objections | |
| | |
Conclusion | |
| | |
Part III | |
| | |
Introduction to Part III | |
| | |
15 | |
| | |
16 | |
| | |
17 | |
| | |
1 Relativist and Minimalist Solutions | |
| | |
2 Externalist Solutions | |
| | |
3 AgentNeutral Solutions | |
| | |
4 Metaphysical Egoist Solutions | |
| | |
5 Solutions | |
| | |
18 | |
| | |
19 | |
| | |
Confusions in the Arguments | |
| | |
Unclear Logical Status of the Theory | |
| | |
20 | |
| | |
II Difficulties for Egoism | |
| | |
IV Difficulties Avoided | |
| | |
V Consequentialist Egoism | |
| | |
VI The Possibility of FlourishingBased Egoism | |
| | |
VII Virtue and SelfInterest Again | |
| | |
21 | |
| | |
Three Arguments in Favor of Ethical Egoism | |
| | |
Three Arguments Against Ethical Egoism | |
| | |
22 | |
| | |
Moral Saints and Moral Theories | |
| | |
Moral Saints and Moral Philosophy | |
| | |
Part IV | |
| | |
Introduction to Part IV | |
| | |
23 | |
| | |
24 | |
| | |
A New Divine Command Theory | |
| | |
25 | |
| | |
Morality | |
| | |
26 | |
| | |
27 | |
| | |
I The Argument Briefly Stated | |
| | |
II Objections and Replies | |
| | |
III Completing the Argument | |
| | |
28 | |
| | |
Criticism of the Strong Position | |
| | |
An Alternative Account | |
| | |
God as Divine Commander | |
| | |
Part V | |
| | |
Introduction to Part V | |
| | |
29 | |
| | |
Of What Sort of Proof the Principle of Utility is Susceptible | |
| | |
30 | |
| | |
31 | |
| | |
3 The Evaluation of Lives | |
| | |
5 Attitudinal Hedonism | |
| | |
6 Some Classic Objections to Hedonism | |
| | |
7 A More Complex Form of Hedonism | |
| | |
8 Yet Another Objection | |
| | |
9 Double DesertAdjusted Hedonism | |
| | |
32 | |
| | |
More Serious Objections to the FullInformation Theory | |
| | |
An Alternative InformedDesire Theory | |
| | |
33 | |
| | |
III | |
| | |
V | |
| | |
VI | |
| | |
VIII | |
| | |
34 | |
| | |
35 | |
| | |
Part VI | |
| | |
Introduction to Part VI | |
| | |
36 | |
| | |
Indeterminism | |
| | |
Conclusion | |
| | |
37 | |
| | |
III | |
| | |
V | |
| | |
38 | |
| | |
39 | |
| | |
40 | |
| | |
The DeepSelf View | |
| | |
The Condition of Sanity | |
| | |
The Sane DeepSelf View | |
| | |
SelfCreation SelfRevision and SelfCorrection | |
| | |
41 | |
| | |
III | |
| | |
IV | |
| | |
V | |
| | |
VI | |
| | |
Part VII | |
| | |
Introduction to Part VII | |
| | |
42 | |
| | |
43 | |
| | |
44 | |
| | |
Vegetables | |
| | |
Human Vegetables | |
| | |
Fetuses | |
| | |
Conclusion | |
| | |