Equality and Responsibility

Front Cover
OUP Oxford, Nov 8, 2001 - Business & Economics - 172 pages
Arguments about distributive justice often take place around two ideas. One is that good should be distributed equally. The other is that how people fare in life should depend on what they are responsible for. The author asks what draws us to these two ideas and examines recent attempts by egalitarian thinkers to bring them together in a single distributive ideal. Underlying this ideal is the egalitarian intuition - the intuition that it is objectionable for some to be worse offthan others through no fault of their own. in a wide-ranging discussion, Lake tests that intuition from a variety of perspectives and points to the gaps in our current thinking about quality and individual responsibility.
 

Contents

Introduction
1
1 What is objectionable about inequalities?
6
2 Responsibility and justice
22
3 What we are responsible for
43
4 The social division of responsibility
66
5 The egalitarian intuition
83
6 Natural talents luck and the market
106
7 Why work?
128
Conclusion
148
Endnotes
153
Bibliography
164
Index
167
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2001)

Christopher Lake was until recently Fellow and Tutor in Politics, Magdalen College, Oxford University, and now works in the private sector.