Countering the New TerrorismRAND's research on terrorism formally began in 1972. Two bloody terrorist incidents that year-the Japanese Red Army attack on passengers at the Lod Airport in Israel and the seizure of Israeli athletes by Black September terrorists at the Olympics in Munich-signaled dramatically to the world that a new mode of warfare had begun. Reacting to this new threat, then President Nixon created the Cabinet Committee to Combat Terrorism, a high level group to coordinate all U.S. counterterrorist efforts. The committee in turn commissioned RAND to examine the phenomenon and how it might affect American security interests. Terrorism was not a new concern for the government, at least in its particular forms-the hijacking of airliners, the kidnapping of diplomats, protest bombings. However, as is so often the case, dramatic events focused interest and mobilized resources. Nor was this entirely new territory for RAND, which previously had studied the use of terrorism in revolutionary and guerrilla warfare, already had identified the new phenomenon of urban guerrilla warfare and its inherent tendency toward the employment of terrorist tactics, and had examined the problem of airline hijackings and assassinations. Having been present at the initiation of RAND's research on terrorism, and now 27 years later being called upon to review this latest RAND volume, Countering the New Terrorism, by Ian Lesser and his colleagues, provides me an opportunity for review and reflection, as well as for pointing out some of the unanticipated consequences of our endeavor. |
Contents
INTRODUCTION | 1 |
Study Approach and Structure | 3 |
TERRORISM TRENDS AND PROSPECTS | 7 |
Terrorisms Changing Characteristics | 8 |
Terrorisms Increasing Lethality | 10 |
Terrorist Tactical Adaptations Across the Technological Spectrum and Their Implications | 28 |
The Example of IRA Targeting of British Forces in Northern Ireland | 31 |
Implications for Antiterrorism and Force Protection | 34 |
Proactive Counterterrorism and the USAF | 77 |
Targeting Terrorists in the Information Age | 80 |
Policy Implications and Conclusions for the USAF | 81 |
COUNTERING THE NEW TERRORISM IMPLICATIONS FOR STRATEGY | 85 |
Understanding and Countering the New Terrorism | 86 |
Terrorism in Strategic Context | 88 |
Indirect Attacks Affecting US Interests | 92 |
Systemic Consequences | 93 |
Conclusion | 35 |
NETWORKS NETWAR AND INFORMATIONAGE TERRORISM | 39 |
Recent Views About Terrorism | 42 |
The Advent of Netwar Analytical Background | 45 |
Definition of Netwar | 47 |
More About Organizational Design | 48 |
Caveats About the Role of Technology | 52 |
Swarming and the Blurring of Offense and Defense | 53 |
Challenges for Counternetwar | 55 |
Middle Eastern Terrorism and Netwar | 56 |
Structure and Actions | 58 |
Middle Eastern Terrorist Groups and the Use of Information Technology | 64 |
Summary Comment | 67 |
Terrorist Doctrines The Rise of a War Paradigm | 68 |
The War Paradigm | 69 |
The NewWorld Paradigm | 71 |
InformationAge Terrorism and the US Air Force | 72 |
Toward a New USAF Strategy for Coping with InformationAge Terrorism | 74 |
Mitigation Measures | 75 |
Terrorism in the War Paradigm | 94 |
Changing Definitions of Security | 96 |
Terrorism and the Conflict Spectrum | 97 |
Future Terrorism Geopolitics | 99 |
Implications for the Future | 110 |
The Lessons and Relevance of Counterterrorism Experience | 111 |
The United Kingdom Experience | 115 |
The French Experience | 117 |
The Israeli Experience | 120 |
Allied Perspectives on Terrorist Challenges Facing the United States | 124 |
Lessons of the Allied Experience | 126 |
Core Strategy | 127 |
Environment Shaping | 134 |
Hedging Strategy | 138 |
Conclusions | 140 |
Implications for Military Strategy and the US Air Force | 142 |
| 145 | |
Other editions - View all
Countering the New Terrorism Ian Lesser,John Arquilla,Bruce Hoffman,David F. Ronfeldt,Michele Zanini Limited preview - 1999 |
Common terms and phrases
activities actors adversaries air and space air power Algerian analysis Arab Afghans Armed Islamic Group Aum Shinrikyo bombers bombing Brian Michael Jenkins Bruce Hoffman challenges conflict counter counterterrorism counterterrorism policy counterterrorism strategy counterterrorist cyberwar David Ronfeldt defense deterrence disruption effect example explosive extremists force protection Global Terrorism Gulf Hamas Hizbullah hostage humint implications increasingly information age information-age international terrorism Internet Islamic Group Israel Israeli Japanese Red Army John Arquilla Laden Libya London mass destruction Middle East motivated movements netwar nodes nonstate nuclear operations organizational Palestinian paradigm patterns political violence potential problem RAND Red Army Faction regional religious response rorist Saudi space power sponsors sponsorship strike tactics targets terrorism's terrorist attacks terrorist groups terrorist incidents terrorist organizations terrorist risks terrorist threat tion traditional transnational trends U.S. Air Force U.S. forces U.S. interests U.S. military United USAF weapons of mass World Trade Center York


