Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better
Over the last twenty or so years, it has become standard to require policy makers to base their recommendations on evidence. That is now uncontroversial to the point of triviality—of course, policy should be based on the facts. But are the methods that policy makers rely on to gather and analyze evidence the right ones? In Evidence-Based Policy, Nancy Cartwright, an eminent scholar, and Jeremy Hardie, who has had a long and successful career in both business and the economy, explain that the dominant methods which are in use now—broadly speaking, methods that imitate standard practices in medicine like randomized control trials—do not work. They fail, Cartwright and Hardie contend, because they do not enhance our ability to predict if policies will be effective. The prevailing methods fall short not just because social science, which operates within the domain of real-world politics and deals with people, differs so much from the natural science milieu of the lab. Rather, there are principled reasons why the advice for crafting and implementing policy now on offer will lead to bad results. Current guides in use tend to rank scientific methods according to the degree of trustworthiness of the evidence they produce. That is valuable in certain respects, but such approaches offer little advice about how to think about putting such evidence to use. Evidence-Based Policy focuses on showing policymakers how to effectively use evidence. It also explains what types of information are most necessary for making reliable policy, and offers lessons on how to organize that information.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
answer assumptions average Bangladesh beneﬁts better car crime car parks causal cake causal loop diagram causal principle causes CCTV claim conclusion conﬁdence context decide decision tree deﬁnition dence discretion drug effectiveness prediction evaluation evidence evidence-based policy evidence-ranking schemes example ﬁdelity ﬁgure ﬁnd ﬁrst ﬁt ﬁve ﬁx Greater London Authority groups identiﬁed implement ingredients intervention INUS conditions kind ladder of abstraction London LongPen look matter meta-analyses negative nutrition operate outcome play a causal play a positive policy played policy worked somewhere positive causal role positive contribution problem produce a contribution question quick exit RCT Argument reading scores reasons reduce reﬂect relevant requires result roles and support scientiﬁc situation social fund social policy speciﬁc strategies study population support factors necessary supposed Tamil Nadu tell theory tion treatment effect trustworthy variable vertical search warrant you've been framed