Freedom of Speech
OUP Oxford, Aug 11, 2005 - Business & Economics - 526 pages
This is a fully revised and updated new edition of the classic work first published in 1985. There have been many important developments since the first edition, including enactment of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada in 1982, the impact of the European Human Rights Convention, and the consideration by English courts of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. Social and cultural changes mean that free speech claims are being made in novel contexts: to challenge the validity of bans on tobacco advertising, to publish 'kiss and tell' stories about celebrities, and to resist attempts to regulate the Internet. Barendt considers the meaning and scope of freedom of speech. How far do free speech and expression clauses protect pornography, commercial advertising, and public meetings on the streets? Does this freedom cover desecration of a national flag? Does it include nude dancing? Eric Barendt discusses the legal protection of free speech in countries including England, the United States (including recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court), Canada, Germany, and under the European Human Rights Convention. He examines the varied approaches of different legal systems and constitutional traditions to balancing free speech and freedom of the press against rights to reputation and privacy, and to copyright and explores the case law in light of the philosophical and political arguments for free speech guarantees.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Why Protect Free Speech?
Freedom of Speech and Other Values
Free Speech in Liberal Legal Systems
20 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
accepted action advertising allegations allow Amendment Appeal apply approach argued argument authority balancing broadcasting BVerfGE censorship chapter circumstances civil claim clear communication concern conduct considered constitutional context course covered criminal criticism decision defendant determine difficult discussion effect engaged entitled equal European example exercise fact free speech free speech rights freedom of expression freedom of speech further German ground groups guaranteed hate speech held hold ideas important imposed individuals infringed interest issues justify leading legislation libel limits Lords majority material matter means meetings Moreover newspaper offence official particular parties political political speech pornography position principle prior restraint proceedings protection provision publish question reasons regarded regulation reputation respect restrictions rule sexual speaker Supreme Court taken tion treated trial truth types United upheld values