Jurisprudence: Theory and Context
This title is aimed at students new to the study of jurisprudence. Its intention is to explain the often complex and difficult ideas in legal philosophy as clearly as possible, without over-simplifying them to the point of distortion. As well as introducing the reader to the fundamental themes in legal philosophy, it also describes and comments critically on the writing of the foremost legal theorists. The text is supplemented by Suggested Further Readings which contain references to related materials. For the third edition, the book has been extensively revised, taking into account the most recent scholarly work, and elaborating on many of the key ideas and arguments.
What people are saying - Write a review
Problems and Possibilities
Conceptual Questions and Jurisprudence
PART B Individual Theories About the Nature of Law
20 other sections not shown
actions American analysis answer apply approach argued argument aspects authority basic basis believe better Cambridge chapter choice claim Clarendon Press common law concepts consent consider costs court create critical debate decisions derived discussed Dworkin Economics Ethics example extent fact Finnis Hart Hart's Harvard Harvard Law Review idea important individual interesting interpretation issues John Journal judges judicial Jurisprudence justice Kelsen kind later Law Review least legal positivism legal system Legal Theory legislation matter meaning moral natural law theory normative obey object obligation offered officials Oxford particular person perspective Philosophy Philosophy of Law political position Posner practice principles problems punishment question race Rawls realists reason reference regarding response rules sense social society sometimes standards theorists things tion traditional trying understanding University Press writings York