Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference

Front Cover
Princeton University Press, 2000 - History - 301 pages

Can European thought be dislodged from the center of the practice of history in a non-European place? What problems arise when we translate cultural practices into the categories of social science? Provincializing Europe is one of the first book-length treatments on how postcolonial thinking impacts on the social sciences. This book explores, through a series of linked essays, the problems of thought that present themselves when we think of a place such as India through the categories of modern, European social science and, in particular, history.

Provincializing Europe is a sustained conversation between historical thinking and postcolonial perspectives. It addresses the mythical figure of Europe that is often taken to be the original site of the modern in many histories of capitalist transition in non-Western countries. This imaginary Europe, Chakrabarty argues, is built right into the social sciences. The very idea of historicizing carries with it some peculiarly European assumptions about disenchanted space, secular time, and human sovereignty. Measured against such mythical standards, capitalist transition in the third world has often seemed either incomplete or lacking. Chakrabarty finds that Nativism, however, is no answer to Eurocentrism, because the universals propounded by European Enlightenment remain indispensable to any social critique that seeks to address issues of social justice and equity. Provincializing Europe proposes that every case of transition to capitalism is a case of translation as well--a translation of existing worlds and their thought-categories into the categories and self-understandings of capitalist modernity. Chakrabarty demonstrates, both theoretically and with examples from colonial and contemporary India, how such translational histories may be thought and written. Provincializing Europe is not a project of shunning European thought. It is a project of globalizing such thought by exploring how it may be renewed both for and from the margins.


What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History
The Two Histories of Capital
Translating LifeWorlds into Labor and History
Minority Histories Subaltern Pasts
Domestic Cruelty and the Birth of the Subject
Nation and Imagination
Adda A History of Sociality
Family Fraternity and Salaried Labor
Reason and the Critique of Historicism

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 22 - Historicism is the belief that an adequate understanding of the nature of any phenomenon and an adequate assessment of its value are to be gained through considering it in terms of the place which it occupied and the role which it played within a process of development.
Page 7 - The country that is more developed industrially only shows, to the less developed, the image of its own future.

About the author (2000)

Dipesh Chakrabarty is Professor of South Asian Studies and History at the University of Chicago where he is also a member of the Committee for History of Culture. He is the author of Rethinking Working-Class History: Bengal 1890-1940 (Princeton) and the coeditor of Subaltern Studies Volume 9.

Bibliographic information