Shadows of Ethics: Criticism and the Just SocietyIn this volume Geoffrey Galt Harpham argues for a deeply original view of the relations among ethics, literary study, and critical theory. In thirteen lucid, provocative and often witty essays, Harpham rejects both the optimism of those who see ethics as a way of solving problems about values or principles and the pessimism of those who regard ethics as primarily a cover story for politics. Ethics, he claims, has been seen by its most powerful theorists as a discourse of "shadows," a characteristic disturbance of thought in the presence of the other, a source of doubts rather than certainty. At the same time, however, ethics includes an element of violence, even blindness and "fundamentalism," a crushing drive to clarity and resolution. Contemporary thinkers, Harpham argues, have been unwilling to accept this account of ethics and the obligations it would impose, and have, as a consequence, cultivated social and intellectual marginality as the only site of virtue, the only position in which critical intelligence is at home. They have, he contends, failed to "imagine the center," to take up the true intellectual and worldly challenge of ethics. Tracking these issues and energies in debates about enlightenment, the politics of the aesthetic, the nature of rationality, and the worldly contexts of theory, Harpham demonstrates in compelling detail the ubiquity and true difficulty of ethics. Shadows of Ethics also revives a neglected genre, the intellectual portrait, with extended meditations on Jacques Derrida, Martha Nussbaum, Fredric Jameson, Geoffrey Hartman, and Noam Chomsky. The book will interest literary critics, philosophers, cultural critics, and all those interested in the ethical character of intellectual work. |
Contents
Thoughts Anterior to an Ethics of Literature | 1 |
Ethics and Literary Study | 18 |
Ethics and the Double Standard of Criticism | 38 |
Derrida and the Ethics of Criticism | 50 |
So What Is Enlightenment? An Inquisition into Modernity | 67 |
Of Rats and Men or Reason in Our Time | 99 |
Aesthetics and the Fundamentals of Modernity | 120 |
History and the Limits of Interpretation | 145 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
aesthetic argues argument become called Chomsky Chomsky's Christopher Norris claim commitment concept consciousness contemporary context conversos counter-Enlightenment critique culture deconstruction defined Derrida desire determined difference discourse distinction Eagleton Enlightenment erotic essay ethics example fact formal Foucault Fredric Jameson freedom Freud Gulf War Habermas Hartman Historicism human identity ideology imagination Inquisition insistence intellectual interest interpretation Jameson Jean-François Lyotard judgment Kant Kant's Kantian kind Lacan language linguistics literary criticism literary theory literature Lyotard margin Marxism means ment Michel Foucault modern moral narrative nature Nietzsche Noam Chomsky norms Norris Nozick Nussbaum object one's perhaps philosophical political position postmodern principle question radical rationality rats reader reading reason represents resistance rigorous says Searle seems sense simply Slavoj Žižek social society structure suggests Temple Grandin Terry Eagleton theoretical theory things thought tion tradition truth unconscious understanding University Press Wordsworth Žižek