Shadows of Ethics: Criticism and the Just Society
In this volume Geoffrey Galt Harpham argues for a deeply original view of the relations among ethics, literary study, and critical theory. In thirteen lucid, provocative and often witty essays, Harpham rejects both the optimism of those who see ethics as a way of solving problems about values or principles and the pessimism of those who regard ethics as primarily a cover story for politics.
Ethics, he claims, has been seen by its most powerful theorists as a discourse of “shadows,” a characteristic disturbance of thought in the presence of the other, a source of doubts rather than certainty. At the same time, however, ethics includes an element of violence, even blindness and “fundamentalism,” a crushing drive to clarity and resolution. Contemporary thinkers, Harpham argues, have been unwilling to accept this account of ethics and the obligations it would impose, and have, as a consequence, cultivated social and intellectual marginality as the only site of virtue, the only position in which critical intelligence is at home. They have, he contends, failed to “imagine the center,” to take up the true intellectual and worldly challenge of ethics.
Tracking these issues and energies in debates about enlightenment, the politics of the aesthetic, the nature of rationality, and the worldly contexts of theory, Harpham demonstrates in compelling detail the ubiquity and true difficulty of ethics. Shadows of Ethics also revives a neglected genre, the intellectual portrait, with extended meditations on Jacques Derrida, Martha Nussbaum, Fredric Jameson, Geoffrey Hartman, and Noam Chomsky.
The book will interest literary critics, philosophers, cultural critics, and all those interested in the ethical character of intellectual work.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Thoughts Anterior to an Ethics of Literature i
Ethics and Literary Study
Ethics and the Double Standard of Criticism
Derrida and the Ethics of Criticism
So What Is Enlightenment? An Inquisition into Modernity
Of Rats and Men or Reason in Our Time
Aesthetics and the Fundamentals of Modernity
History and the Limits of Interpretation
Other editions - View all
according action actually aesthetic appear argues argument become begins called choice Chomsky claim commitment concept concerns consciousness constitutes contemporary course criticism culture decision defined Derrida describes desire determined difference discourse distinction effect Enlightenment especially essay ethics example fact feel force Foucault freedom Freud Hartman human idea identity ideology imagination individual Inquisition insistence intellectual interest interpretation issue Jameson judgment Kant kind knowledge language linguistic literary literature live margin Marxism means mind moral narrative nature Norris Nussbaum object once particular perhaps philosophical political position possible postmodern practice precisely present principle produced question rationality rats reader reading reason relation represents resistance respect responsibility rules says seems sense simply social society speaks stand structure suggests theoretical theory things thought tion tradition truth turn unconscious understanding universal writes