Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction
"Sen deliberately left the capability approach 'incomplete' in order to ensure its relevance to persons and cultures with different understandings of the good. Part I proposes a framework for identifying valuable capabilities that retain this 'fundamental' incompleteness and space for individual and cultural diversity. Drawing on the work of John Finnis and others, Alkire addresses foundational issues regarding the identification and pursuit of 'valuable' dimensions of human development based in practical reason, then observes that much of the criticism and development arises from negative impacts on social or cultural/religious dimensions that are also deeply valued by the poor. Part I closes with a four-part 'operational definition' of basic capability that bridges 'basic needs', participation, and informed consent.".
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
able achieved action activity actually additional agency alternative analysis argues assessment basic capabilities basic needs benefits capability approach changes chapter choice choose concerns consider considerations costs criticism cultural decision described dimensions discussion economic effects ends ethical evaluation example exercise expand fact Finnis Finnis's freedom functionings further give given goal goat human human development identify impacts important income increase indicators individual institutions internal issues kinds knowledge literacy means method methodology moral nature necessary Nussbaum objective one's organization Oxfam participation participatory particular persons political poor positive possible poverty practical reason principles problem procedure proposed question ranking rationality refers reflect relationships relative represent rose Sect seems Sen's significant social specified studies suggest Table theory tion valuable wage weights well-being women World