F. Brundage for appellant.

Charles A. Pooley, for respondent.

PARKER, J., reads for reversal.

All concur.

Judgment reversed.

JAMES G. KNAPP, Appellant, v. THE PREFERRED MUTUAL ACCIDENT ASSOCIATION, of New York, Respondent.

(Submitted October 8, 1891; decided October 20, 1891.)

APPEAL from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the fifth judicial department, made June 22, 1889, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, ent、red upon a verdict and reversed an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Tabor & Brainard for appellant.

E. C. Aiken for respondent.

Agree to dismiss appeal on authority of Williams v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co. (127 N. Y. 643); no opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.

CONRAD STUBING, Respondent, v. JOHN STUBING et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants.

(Argued October 9, 1891; decided October 27, 1891.)

APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the City Court of Brooklyn, entered upon an order made October 28, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.

Leopold Leo for appellants.

Fernando Solinger for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

JOHN M. YOUNG, Respondent, v. THE METROPOLITAN ELEVATED RAILWAY COMPANY et al., Appellants.

(Argued October 9, 1891; decided October 27, 1891.)

APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered upon an order made November 12, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.

Brainard Tolles for appellants.

Charles Gibson Bennett for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

WILLIAM B. RICE, Appellant, v. ATMORE L. BAGGOT,
Respondent.

(Submitted October 12, 1891; decided October 27, 1891.)

APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made the first Monday of January, 1889, which affirmed ajudgment in favor of defendant, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.

George S. Hastings for appellant.

Moses Goodman for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

CASPER DORT, Appellant, v. EVA NICKEN, Respondent, (Submitted October 12, 1891; decided October 27, 1891.)

APPEAL from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the fifth judicial department, made October 19, 1889, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.

Myron II. Peck for appellant.

William C. Fitch for respondent.

Agree to reverse order and to affirm judgment of Special Term on opinion of DANIELS, J., at Special Term.

All concur.

Ordered accordingly.

THE MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. JOHN M. CORNELL, Respondent.

(Argued October 12, 1891; decided October 27, 1891.)

APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, in favor of defendant, entered upon an order made November 7, 1889, which dismissed plaintiff's claim upon the merits on a case submitted under sections 1279-1281 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Samuel H. Benton for appellant.

Tallmadge W. Foster for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

ISAAC WOLF, by Guardian, etc., Appellant, v. THE HOUSTON, WEST STREET AND PAVONIA FERRY RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent.

(Argued October 13, 1891; decided October 27, 1891.)

APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made November 23, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Circuit.

Max Altmayer for appellant.

Charles E. Miller for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

SAMUEL E. MERWIN et al., Appellants, v. ANDREW JACKSON ROGERS, Respondent.

(Submitted October 13, 1891; decided October 30, 1891.)

APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered upon an order made June 29, 1889, which affirmed a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of New York in favor of defendant, entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

J. Homer Hildreth for appellants.

James C. De La Mare for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

'All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

THOMAS OTIES, Respondent, v. THE COWLES ELECTRIC SMELTING AND ALUMINUM COMPANY, Appellant.

(Argued October 14, 1891; decided October 30, 1891.)

APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made October 1, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.

E. M. Ashley for appellant.

Wm. C. Greene for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

LEVI S. NOYES, Appellant, v. WILLIAM TURNBULL et al., Respondents.

(Argued October 14, 1891; decided October 30, 1891.)

APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made September 21, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict directed by the court.

Edward F. Bullard for appellant.

Jesse Johnson for respondents.

Agree to affirm on opinion of LEARNED, J., in court below. All concur.

Judgment affirmed.