Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Volume 311863 - Asia |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 86
Page 2
... that Harsha was a Vais'ya. For the rest, he has, pretty evidently, confounded
him with another S'il£ditya, whom he terms a Kshatriya. Was Dhruvapatu,—
called son-in-law of S'ilz'\ditya,—another name of Grahavarman, soon to be
mentioned ...
... that Harsha was a Vais'ya. For the rest, he has, pretty evidently, confounded
him with another S'il£ditya, whom he terms a Kshatriya. Was Dhruvapatu,—
called son-in-law of S'ilz'\ditya,—another name of Grahavarman, soon to be
mentioned ...
Page 3
... mentioned among his subjects, with the tribes of Gauda, Mélava, Karnéta, &c.
He was, therefore, sovereign of Thibet and Bootan, as well as of Hindusthan,
Bengal, and the Dekhin. It was, probably, in Tbibet that he encountered the Hnns,
...
... mentioned among his subjects, with the tribes of Gauda, Mélava, Karnéta, &c.
He was, therefore, sovereign of Thibet and Bootan, as well as of Hindusthan,
Bengal, and the Dekhin. It was, probably, in Tbibet that he encountered the Hnns,
...
Page 6
In Mahor, or Maholi, as the traditionary capital of a Réjii Bhoja, and in Bhojapura,
near Farrukhabad, we possibly have traces of one or other of the Bhojas
mentioned above.* If Devas'akti had not been a. usurper, Viniiyakapéla would
naturally ...
In Mahor, or Maholi, as the traditionary capital of a Réjii Bhoja, and in Bhojapura,
near Farrukhabad, we possibly have traces of one or other of the Bhojas
mentioned above.* If Devas'akti had not been a. usurper, Viniiyakapéla would
naturally ...
Page 7
Near where he is spoken of is the date 960. Next comes Bhoja, and then
Mahendrapzila again, with the date 9641. Further on Kshitipala is mentioned ;
and, after him, Devapala, the date 1005 being close by. These dates, I may
observe, are ...
Near where he is spoken of is the date 960. Next comes Bhoja, and then
Mahendrapzila again, with the date 9641. Further on Kshitipala is mentioned ;
and, after him, Devapala, the date 1005 being close by. These dates, I may
observe, are ...
Page 8
Pratislitlizina is mentioned in it. The date is Samvat 1084-, S'r:ivar_1a, vadi 41. It
should appear, therefore, that, already in the eleventh century, there were
independent chieftuins intermediate to Kananj and Benares. _ N0 equally early ...
Pratislitlizina is mentioned in it. The date is Samvat 1084-, S'r:ivar_1a, vadi 41. It
should appear, therefore, that, already in the eleventh century, there were
independent chieftuins intermediate to Kananj and Benares. _ N0 equally early ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Afghans Akyab ancient animal appear Arakan Asiatic Society Babu Bamo banks Bay of Bengal Bhoja Borneo Buddhist Burma Burmese Calcutta Capt Captain celts chief chiefly coins Colonel colour containing Council Dhoon district ditto doubt east edited Elephants Esquire Europe feet field fifty figure find fine fire first five glacier Government gulf of Siam Gwalior height hills Himalayas Hindu Hon’ble horns India INDICUS inhabitants inscription Journal Kabul Kanauj Khan king Krau land letter lower Major Martaban mentioned Mergui miles Moulmein mountains Museum notice observed passed Pegu Peshawar present President probably proposed provinces Pushto Rangoon remarkable Rhinoceros river road ruins Sanskrit seen side skull Society’s SONDAICUS species specimens steamers stone Survey Suwat Suwét Suwzit Tavoy temple Térrnah tion tope trees two-horned Upper valley Veda village W. T. Blanford wild word