Lawyers' Reports Annotated, Book 5Lawyers' Co-operative Publishing Company, 1889 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 88
Page 33
... effect the court will not apply the gift cy près . NOTE . - Public charities ; Statute of Uses and Trusts , | 741 ; Hathaway v . New Baltimore , 48 Mich . 254 ) ; k3 Eliz . chap . A. The Statute of Uses and Trusts , 43 Eliz . chap . 4 ...
... effect the court will not apply the gift cy près . NOTE . - Public charities ; Statute of Uses and Trusts , | 741 ; Hathaway v . New Baltimore , 48 Mich . 254 ) ; k3 Eliz . chap . A. The Statute of Uses and Trusts , 43 Eliz . chap . 4 ...
Page 34
... effect are Leonard v . Burr , 18 N. Y. wealth as succeeding tofthe powers of the King as 107 , in which the gift was to the Village of Glovers- parens patriæ . See Fountain¡ v . Ravenel , 58 U. S. | ville , when it should be ...
... effect are Leonard v . Burr , 18 N. Y. wealth as succeeding tofthe powers of the King as 107 , in which the gift was to the Village of Glovers- parens patriæ . See Fountain¡ v . Ravenel , 58 U. S. | ville , when it should be ...
Page 36
... effect , the donee or legatee takes the legal title only , and a trust results by implication of law to the donor and his representatives or to the testator's residuary legatees or next of kin . Nichols v . Allen , 130 Mass . 212 ...
... effect , the donee or legatee takes the legal title only , and a trust results by implication of law to the donor and his representatives or to the testator's residuary legatees or next of kin . Nichols v . Allen , 130 Mass . 212 ...
Page 39
... effect according to the intention of the donor . Downing v . Marshall , 23 How . Pr . 29 . Although a donation was given to no one by name , nor for any particular children or inhabi- tants , yet it was held a gift for a public charity ...
... effect according to the intention of the donor . Downing v . Marshall , 23 How . Pr . 29 . Although a donation was given to no one by name , nor for any particular children or inhabi- tants , yet it was held a gift for a public charity ...
Page 67
... effect , had made such claims de- mands against the United States , of which this court had jurisdiction , as was held in the case of Weld v . U. S. 23 Ct . Cl . 126 , affirmed on ap peal ( 127 U. S. 51 , 32 L. ed . 62 ) , and they had ...
... effect , had made such claims de- mands against the United States , of which this court had jurisdiction , as was held in the case of Weld v . U. S. 23 Ct . Cl . 126 , affirmed on ap peal ( 127 U. S. 51 , 32 L. ed . 62 ) , and they had ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adverse possession agreement alleged Allen appellant appellee applied Asso Atty-Gen authority Bank Barb Baring Brothers bill bill of lading Cent charity claim Clark Colehour common law Conn Constitution construction contract conveyance conveyed corporation County court of equity creditors damages debt decree deed defendant duty easement entitled equity estoppel evidence executed executor fact fendant fraud gift grant habeas corpus Hansbrough held injunction injury intention interest Iowa judgment jurisdiction jury land liable lien lots Mass ment mortgage mortgagor N. J. Eq navigable Ohio St owner P. R. Co paid Paige parties payment person plaintiff plaintiffs in error possession premises purchase question railroad reason recover rule Smith Stat statute street supra Teleg testator thereof tion tract trust United void wall Wend West Wire Company
Popular passages
Page 89 - We hold it to be an incontrovertible principle, that the government of the United States may, by means of physical force, exercised through its official agents, execute on every foot of American soil the powers and functions that belong to it.
Page 34 - In the government of this commonwealth, the legislative department shall never exercise the executive and judicial powers, or either of them : the executive shall never exercise the legislative and judicial powers, or either of them: the judicial shall never exercise the legislative and executive powers, or either of them : to the end it may be a government of laws and not of men.
Page 136 - ... engage mutually not to grant any particular favor to other nations, in respect of commerce and navigation, which shall not immediately become common to the other party, who shall enjoy the same freely, if the concession was freely made, or on allowing the same compensation, if the concession was conditional.
Page 86 - The Constitution and laws of the United States are the supreme law of the land, and to these every citizen of every State owes obedience, whether in his individual or official capacity.
Page 375 - To lay out its road not exceeding six rods in width, and to construct the same; and for the purpose of cuttings and embankments, to take as much more land as may be necessary for the proper construction and security of the road...
Page 329 - BY the 4th section of the statute of frauds," it is enacted that " no action shall be brought whereby to charge any person upon any contract or sale of lands, tenements, or hereditaments, or any interest in or concerning them, unless the agreement upon which such action shall be brought, or some memorandum or 'note thereof, shall be in writing, and signed by the party to be charged therewith, or some other person thereunto by him lawfully authorized.
Page 415 - A valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit, or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility given, suffered, or undertaken by the other.
Page 119 - The powers of the Government are divided into three separate departments: the Legislative, the Executive (including the administrative), and the Judicial; and no person charged with official duties under one of these departments shall exercise any of the functions of another except as in this Constitution expressly provided.
Page 166 - And it is a rule of universal application, that no one, having such duties to discharge, shall be allowed to enter into engagements, in which he has, or can have, a personal interest conflicting, or which possibly may conflict, with the interests of those whom he is bound to protect.
Page 213 - A decisive test is whether the vendor assumes to assert a fact of which the buyer is ignorant, or merely states an opinion or judgment upon a matter of which the vendor has no special knowledge, and on which the buyer may be expected also to have an opinion, and to exercise his judgment. In the former case there is a warranty, in the latter, not.