Page images
PDF
EPUB

1219

CIVIL RIGHTS.

See "Constitutional Law," §§ 3, 6, 7.

Under Kirby's Dig. § 6622, it is not necessary
that railroads furnish the same accommodations

at stations for the white and colored race, but
the statute merely prohibits discrimination.
Choctaw, O. & G. R. Co. v. State (Ark.) 426.
Indictment against a railroad, under Kirby's
Dig. $$ 6622, 6634, 6636, for failing to main-
tain equal and sufficient passenger accommoda-
tions at a station, held defective.-Choctaw, O.
& G. R. Co. v. State (Ark.) 426.

[blocks in formation]

COLLECTION.

Of costs, see "Costs," § 4.

COMMERCE.

Carriage of goods and passengers, see "Car-
riers.'

$1. Power to regulate in general.
by which interstate commerce shall be governed.
Congress has the power to prescribe the rules
-Barnhard Bros. & Spindler v.
(Tex. Civ. App.) 376.

§ 2. Subjects of regulation.

Morrison

Whisky shipped out of the state, in order to
be reshipped into the state to evade the local
option law, is not the subject of interstate com-
merce. Crigler v. Commonwealth (Ky.) 276.

Express company which carried a C. O. D.
shipment of liquor from a foreign state into a
local option territory and there held it a week
before delivering it to the consignee held to be-
come a bailee of the liquor, and could not de-
subsec. 4, on the ground that the shipment_was
fend a prosecution under Ky. St. 1903, § 2557,
monwealth (Ky.) 1111.
interstate commerce.-Adams Exp. Co. v. Com-

Interstate commerce defined.-Barnhard Bros.
& Spindler v. Morrison (Tex. Civ. App.) 376.
§ 3. Means and methods of regulation.
Municipal ordinance requiring improvement
contracts to require the work of stone dressing
to be done within the state held not to violate
interstate commerce clause of the federal Con-
stitution.-Allen v. Labsap (Mo. Sup.) 926.

A foreign corporation may send its agents
into this state without procuring the certificate
required by Rev. St. 1895, arts. 745, 746.-
Barnhard Bros. & Spindler v. Morrison (Tex.
Civ. App.) 376.

Foreign corporation cannot ship goods to
agents in the state for sale without complying
with Rev. St. 1895, arts. 745, 746.-Barnhard
Bros. & Spindler v. Morrison (Tex. Civ. App.)
376.

COMMISSION.

Inquisition of lunacy, see "Insane Persons,"
§ 1.

To take testimony, see "Depositions."

COMMISSIONERS.

Of General Land Office, see "Public Lands," § 1.
Of General Land Office, mandamus, see "Man-
damus," § 1.

COMMISSIONS.

Of agent, see "Principal and Agent," § 2.
Of broker, see "Brokers," § 3.

Of estate of decedent, see "Executors and Ad- Of executor or administrator, see "Executors
ministrators," § 3.

Of taxes, see "Taxation," §§ 3, 4.

COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES.

Appropriations for, see "States," § 3.

COLLISION.

With street car, see "Street Railroads," § 1.

COLOR OF TITLE.

To sustain adverse possession, see "Adverse
Possession."

COMBINATIONS.

See "Monopolies," § 1.

and Administrators," § 7.

COMMON CARRIERS.

See "Carriers."

COMMON DRUNKARDS.

See "Drunkards."

COMMON LAW.

Agister's lien, see "Animals."
Liability of carrier, see "Carriers," § 9.
Presumption as to, see "Evidence," § 2.

COMMON SCHOOLS.

See "Schools and School Districts," § 1

COMMUNITY PROPERTY.

See "Husband and Wife," § 3.
Division on divorce, see "Divorce," § 3.

COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE.

See "Negligence," § 3.

COMPENSATION.

For performance of contract, see "Contracts,"
§ 2.

For property taken for public use, see "Emi-
nent Domain," § 2.

For services, see "Master and Servant," § 2.
Of agent, see "Principal and Agent," § 2.
Of attorney, see "Attorney and Client," § 3.
Of broker, see "Brokers," § 3.

Of executor or administrator, see "Executors
and Administrators," § 7.

Of guardian ad litem, see "Infants," § 2.
Of receiver, see "Receivers," § 5.

Of state officers, see "States," § 2.

COMPETENCY.

Of evidence in civil actions, see "Evidence,"
8 4.

Of evidence in criminal prosecution, see "Crim-
inal Law," §§ 6-12.

Of juror, see "Jury," § 2.

Of witnesses in general, see "Witnesses," § 1.

COMPLAINT.

CONCUBINAGE.

See "Abduction," § 1.

Documentary evidence, see "Criminal Law,"
§ 6.

CONDEMNATION.

Taking property for public use, see "Eminent
Domain."

CONDITIONAL SALES.

See "Sales," § 7.

CONDITIONS.

Condemnation proceedings as condition preced-
ent to right to construct railroad, see "Emi-
In conveyance of right of way, see "Railroads,"
nent Domain," § 3.
$ 4.

In deeds, see "Deeds," § 2.

In insurance policies, see "Insurance," §§ 3, 4.
In appeal bonds, see "Appeal and Error," § 23.
In mortgages, see "Mortgages," § 4.
Precedent to action for breach of warranty,
see "Sales," § 6.

Precedent to lease of public lands, see "Public
Lands," § 1.

Precedent to membership in beneficial associa-
tion, see "Insurance," § 11.

CONFESSION.

Admissibility in evidence, see "Criminal Law,"
§ 11.
In criminal prosecution, see "Indictment and Instructions, see "Criminal Law," § 18.
Information."

[blocks in formation]

Effect on limitation, see "Limitation of Ac-
tions," § 2.

CONCLUSION.

[blocks in formation]

CONSIDERATION.

Of contract, see "Contracts," § 1.

Of conveyance to child, see "Parent and Child."

Of indictment, see "Indictment and Informa- Parol evidence, see "Evidence," § 11.
tion," § 1.

Of witness, see "Evidence," § 12.

To support claim of bona fide purchaser, see
"Vendor and Purchaser," § 4.

CONSPIRACY.

Combinations to monopolize trade, see "Mo-
nopolies," § 1.

Evidence of acts and declarations of conspir-
ators, see "Criminal Law," § 9.
Instructions, see "Criminal Law," § 18.

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.

Appellate jurisdiction in cases involving consti-
tutional questions, see "Courts," § 5.
Judicial notice of amendment of Constitution,
see "Evidence," § 1.

Provisions relating to particular subjects.
See "Commerce," § 1; "Eminent Domain," § 1;
"Intoxicating Liquors," § 1; "Jury," § 1.
Appropriations, see "States," § 3.
Enactment and validity of statutes, see "Stat-
utes," § 1.

Municipal debts, see "Municipal Corporations,"
§§ 7-9.

Municipal officers, see "Municipal Corpora-
tions," § 2.

Municipal taxes, see "Municipal Corporations,"
§ 9.

School debt, see "Schools and School Districts,"
$ 1.

Special or local laws, see "Statutes." § 2.
Title of statutes, see "Statutes," § 3.

1. Construction, operation, and en-
forcement of constitutional pro-
visions.

Any repugnancy of Kirby's Dig. §§ 513, 514,
concerning notes given in payment for sales
of patent rights, to Const. U. S. Amend. 14,
guarantying the equal protection of the laws,
caused by section 516 providing that the act
shall not apply to merchants and dealers who
sell patented things in the usual course of
business, held immaterial, in action on note
given for interest in patent right.-John Woods
& Sons v. Carl (Ark.) 621.

An objection that the statute on which a
prosecution was based was unconstitutional,
failing to point out the article or section claim-
ed to be violated, is insufficient.-State v. Cobb
(Mo. App.) 551.

Plain and definite words of the Constitution
are to be taken in their ordinary meaning.
Keller v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 669.

Wherever the intent of the framers of the
Constitution is clearly expressed, it will be
followed by the court.-Keller v. State (Tex.
Cr. App.) 669.

The question whether part of Pen. Code
1895, art. 402, as amended by Gen. Laws 1903,
p. 55, c. 40, is unconstitutional, and, if so,
ed, held immaterial on a prosecution for sale
of intoxicating liquors.-Uloth v. State (Tex.
Cr. App.) 822.

whether it vitiates the whole article as amend-

Retail liquor dealer held not entitled to raise
objection that liquor dealer's act is unconstitu-
tional, on ground that it is discriminating as
to wines produced from grapes grown in state.
-McLaury v. Watelsky (Tex. Civ. App.) 1045.

2. Distribution of governmental pow-
ers and functions.

Kirby's Dig. § 6886, licensing itinerant mer-
chants, could not be so changed as to exempt
only a merchant who sells in the usual course
of trade at his place of business, since such
alteration would encroach on legislative depart-
ment.-Ex parte Deeds (Ark.) 1030.

3. Personal, civil, and political rights.
Municipal ordinance requiring improvement
contracts to require the work of stone dressing to
be done within the state held not violative of
Const. art. 2. § 4.-Allen v. Labsap (Mo. Sup.)
926.

[blocks in formation]

A city ordinance, in so far as it merely pro-
vided for the taxation of omitted property, held
not void as an ex post facto law. Muir's
Adm'rs v. City of Bardstown (Ky.) 1096.

A city ordinance providing for the taxation
of omitted property, though retrospective, was
not invalid for that reason. Muir's Adm'rs v.
City of Bardstown (Ky.) 1096.

and taxation of omitted property, in so far as
A city ordinance, providing for the assessment
facto law.-Muir's Adm'rs v. City of Bardstown
it provided a penalty, held void as an ex post
(Ky.) 1096.

§ 6. Privileges or immunities, and class
legislation.

Kirby's Dig. § 6886, licensing itinerant mer-
chants, held in violation of Const. Ark. art.
2, § 18, as denying citizens equal privileges
and immunities.-Ex parte Deeds (Ark.) 1030.

Municipal ordinance, requiring improvement
contracts to require the work of stone dress-
ing to be done within the state, held not to vio-
late Const. U. S. art. 4, § 2.-Allen v. Labsap
(Mo. Sup.) 962.

8 7. Equal protection of laws.
chants, held in violation of the fourteenth
Kirby's Dig. § 6886, licensing itinerant mer-
amendment of the federal Constitution, as de-
nying citizens equal protection of the law.
Ex parte Deeds (Ark.) 1030.

Liquor dealer's act held not repugnant to
Const. U. S. Amend. 14, securing to all persons
the equal protection of the laws.-McLaury v.
Watelsky (Tex. Civ. App.) 1045.

8. Due process of law.

Municipal ordinance requiring improvement
contracts to require the work of stone dressing
to be done within the state held not to violate
Const. art. 2, § 30, and Const. U. S. Amend. 14,
§ 1.-Allen v. Labsap (Mo. Sup.) 926.

Acts 1897, pp. 5, 19, c. 1, §§ 4, 27, re-enacted
in Acts 1899, p. 1115, c. 435, § 33, Acts 1901, p.
336. c. 174, § 32, and Acts 1903, p. 663, c. 258,
§ 32, under which a lien for taxes assessed to
remainderman, held not repugnant to Const.
a life tenant attaches to the interest of the
§ 8, and Const. U. S. Amend. 14, forbidding the
deprivation of property without due process of
law.-Hadley v. Hadley (Tenn.) 250.

CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE.

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

Contracts of particular classes of parties.
See "Attorney and Client," § 3; "Carriers," §§
1-5; "Corporations," § 5; "Master and Serv-
ant"; "Municipal Corporations," § 3; "Rail-
roads," § 4.

Promoters, see "Corporations," § 1.

Contracts relating to particular subjects.
See "Interest"; "Logs and Logging"; "Mines
and Minerals," § 1.
Community property, see "Husband and Wife,"

$ 3.

Contingent fees, see "Attorney and Client," § 3.
Division of estate, see "Descent and Distribu-
tion," § 1.

Ground for mechanics' liens, see "Mechanics'
Liens," § 1.

Limitation of liability, see "Carriers," § 3.
Maintenance of railroad offices, see "Rail-
roads," § 4.

Maintenance of railroad station, see "Rail-
roads," § 3.

Public improvements, see "Municipal Corpora-
tions," § 3.
Renting on shares, see "Landlord and Tenant,"
8 4.

Transportation of goods, see "Carriers," §§ 1, 2.
Transportation of live stock, see "Carriers," §§
3, 4.

Transportation of passengers, see "Carriers,"
$ 5.

Particular classes of express contracts.
See "Bills and Notes"; "Covenants"; "Ex-
change of Property"; "Guaranty"; "Indem-
nity"; "Insurance"; "Joint Adventures";
"Liens"; "Monopolies," § 1; "Partnership";
"Rewards"; "Sales."

Sales of realty, see "Vendor and Purchaser."
Sales of timber, see "Logs and Logging.'
Suretyship, see "Principal and Surety."
Transportation of goods, see "Carriers," §§ 1, 2.
Transportation of live stock, see "Carriers," 88
3. 4.
Transportation of passenger, see "Carriers," § 5.
Particular modes of discharging contracts.
See "Accord and Satisfaction"; "Compromise
and Settlement"; "Release."

1. Requisites and validity.

drawing plans, held, that it was a question for
In an action by an architect to recover for
the jury whether defendant had accepted cer-
tain plans, after they were made, knowing
that they called for the construction of a build-
ing in excess of defendant's original cost limita-
tion.-Hight v. Klingensmith (Ark.) 138.

A stipulation in a contract that neither par
ty may resort to the courts is void, as contrary
to public policy.-Hager v. Shuck (Ky.) 300.

Note given in payment for pasturing cattle
on inclosed portion of public domain, in viola-
tion of Act Feb. 25, 1885, c. 149, 23 Stat. 321
[U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1524], held based on
illegal consideration, and unenforceable.-Tandy
V. Elmore-Cooper Live Stock Commission Co.
(Mo. App.) 614.

Infirmity of note given in payment for pas-
turing cattle on inclosed portion of public do-
main, in violation of Act Feb. 25, 1885, c. 149,
23 Stat. 321 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1524),
held to extend to guaranty thereof, and to con-
stitute defense open to guarantor in action on
guaranty itself.-Tandy v. Elmore-Cooper Live
Stock Commission Co. (Mo. App.) 614.

Fact that amount of note given in payment
for pasturing cattle on inclosed portion of pub-
lic domain, in violation of Act Feb. 25, 1885, c.
149, 23 Stat. 321 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p.
1524], was arrived at by arbitration, held not
to cure infirmity of note or guaranty thereof
arising out of its illegal consideration.-Tandy
v. Elmore-Cooper Live Stock Commission Co.
(Mo. App.) 614.

A contract by a railroad to perpetually main-
tain its general offices and shops in plaintiff city
held not void as against public policy.-City of
Tyler v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of
Texas (Tex. Civ. App.) 238.

2.

Construction and operation.

A contract concerning a loan secured by trust
deed and notes held not such an indivisible one
as to preclude the lender from maintaining an
action on the notes and trust deed.-Less v.
English (Ark.) 447.

"General stipulations" of a construction con-
tract held to constitute part of its specifica-
tions," within the meaning of a subcontract-
or's contract, making the "specifications" of
tractor's contract.-McGregor v. J. A. Ware
the construction contract part of the subcon-
Const. Co. (Mo. Sup.) 981.

In an action for conversion of timber, de-
fendant held to have adopted sales of timber
made by his vendees under contract for sale
of land. Watson v. Gross (Mo. App.) 104.

Contracts are matters of fact, to be construed
by their terms and stipulations and the intent
of the contracting parties.-Keller v. State
(Tex. Cr. App.) 669.

Under a contract to clear and break land for
a compensation of "5 cents per grub for clear-
ing, and $1.50 per acre for breaking," the term
"grub" should be construed as commonly under-
stood by those making such contracts.-Camp-

Agency, see "Principal and Agent."
Employment, see "Brokers," § 1; "Master and bell v. Howerton (Tex. Civ. App.) 370.

Servant."

Leases, see "Landlord and Tenant."

3. Performance or breach.
Determination by engineer of classification
of material excavated held, in the absence of
Mutual benefit insurance, see "Insurance,” § 11. fraud or mistake, binding, under the terms of

Limitation of liability, see "Carriers," § 3.

the contract, upon the parties.-McGregor v.
J. A. Ware Const. Co. (Mo. Sup.) 981.

Construction contract held to make the de-
termination of an engineer as to the classifica-
tion of excavated material conclusive on the

contractor. McGregor v. J. A. Ware Const.
Co. (Mo. Sup.) 981.

One contracting to drill an oil well, guaranty-
ing it to be a flowing well, held not entitled to
recover the contract price, it not being a flow-
ing well.-R. L. Cox & Co. v. J. H. Markham,
Jr., & Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 1163.

§ 4. Actions for breach.

In an action by an architect for drawing
plans, an instruction as to the circumstances un-
der which plaintiff would be entitled to recover
held proper.-Hight v. Klingensmith (Ark.)
138.

Where, in an action on a contract, the execu-
tion was not put in issue by a verified answer, it
was error to permit the defendant to attack
its execution.-Stark v. Hicklin (Mo. App.)
106.

In an action to recover for defendant's fail-
ure to permit plaintiff to fulfill a contract to
clear defendant's land, an assignment_ of error
held without merit. Campbell v. Howerton
(Tex. Civ. App.) 370.

In an action for damages for breach of a
contract to mow hay, verdict rejected by court
held sufficient.-Parker v. Stroud (Tex. Civ.
App.) 734.

In an action for damages for breach of a
contract to mow hay, verdict held insufficient.
-Parker v. Stroud (Tex. Civ. App.) 734.

Evidence of waiver, during drilling of an oil
well, of contractor's guaranty that it should
be a flowing well, held not to avail him in ac-
tion for contract price, not being pleaded.-R.
L. Cox & Co. v. J. H. Markham, Jr., & Co.
(Tex. Civ. App.) 1163.

CONTRADICTION.

Of record, see "Appeal and Error, § 11.
Of witness, see "Witnesses," § 3.

CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE.

See "Negligence," § 3.

Harmless error, see "Appeal and Error," § 20.
Of passenger, see "Carriers," § 7.

Of person injured at railroad crossing, see
"Railroads," § 10.

Of person injured by electricity, see "Electric-
ity."

Of person injured by obstruction of street by
railroad, see "Railroads," § 5.

Of person injured by operation of street car,
see "Street Railroads," § 1.

Of person injured on street, see "Municipal
Corporations," § 6.

Of person on railroad track, see "Railroads,"
§ 11.

Of servant, see "Master and Servant," § 7.

CONVERSION.

See "Embezzlement."
Instructions as to circumstantial evidence in
prosecution for fraudulent conversion, see
"Criminal Law," § 18.
Province of jury in prosecution for fraudulent
conversion, see "Criminal Law," § 17.

CONVEYANCES.

By husband, right of widow to dower, see
"Dower," & 2.

Contracts to convey, see "Vendor and Pur-
chaser," § 2.

In fraud of creditors, see "Fraudulent Con-
veyances."

In trust, see "Trusts." § 1.

Of property affected by lien, see "Mechanics'
Liens," $2.

Subject to timber contract, see "Logs and Log-
ging."

Conveyances by or to particular classes of
parties.

See "Infants," § 1; "Parent and Child"; "Rail-
roads," § 4; "Receivers," § 3.

Administrator of community, see "Husband
and Wife," § 3.

Co-tenants, see "Tenancy in Common," § 2.
Conveyances of particular species of property.
See "Easements," § 1; "Homestead," § 2;
"Public Lands," § 1.
Community property, see "Husband and Wife,"
$ 3.
Mortgaged property, see "Mortgages," § 3.
Particular classes of conveyances.

See "Assignments"; "Assignments for Benefit
of Creditors"; "Chattel Mortgages"; "Deeds";
"Mortgages."

[blocks in formation]

Bequest of proceeds of stock as carrying divi-
dends, see "Wills," § 4.

Guaranty of return of money invested in, see
"Guaranty," § 2.

Limitation of action against foreign corpora-
tion, see "Limitation of Actions," § 1.

Municipal aid, see "Municipal Corporations," §§
7, 9.

Taxation of corporations and corporate prop-
erty, see "Taxation."

Particular classes of corporations.
See "Building and Loan Associations"; "Mu-
nicipal Corporations"; "Railroads"; "Turn-
pikes and Toll Roads," § 1.
Banks, see "Banks and Banking."
Insurance companies, see "Insurance."
Telegraph and telephone companies, see "Tele-
graphs and Telephones."

§ 1. Incorporation and organization.
A corporation is not liable for legal services
rendered at the request of one of its promot-
ers, unless after its organization it adopted the
contract made by the promoter.-Jones v.
Smith (Tex. Civ. App.) 210.

Where an attorney, acting under a contract
with a promoter of a corporation, rendered
services in preparing the charter, by-laws, etc.,
the use of the charter and by-laws by the cor-
poration were not an adoption of the promot-
er's contract.-Jones v. Smith (Tex. Civ. App.)
210.

§ 2. Capital, stock, and dividends.

Kirby's Dig. §§ 848, 849, requiring transfers
of stock to be recorded with the county clerk,
do not apply to transfers by way of pledge.-
Hudson v. Bank of Pine Bluff (Ark.) 1177.

« PreviousContinue »