Let f(x, y) = c be the implicit function of two variables, which may be put in the form u = y) = c. Then, since u is equal to a constant, Dm = 0; and therefore by the last Article, (-) dy \dx> (44) Ex. 1. M = x3 + 3axy + y3 = a3; dy _ aP + ay Ex. 2. u — x» + y* = a; @ = y*'"1+f*lo&y' (J) = ^log^+^-i. dy _ _ yx*-1 + y* log w And without going through the intermediate stage of partial differentiation, we may take (40) or (41) of the preceding Article, and differentiate immediately. Thus Ex.3. £ + £ = 1; 2xdx 2ydy _ dy _ b*x aa b2 ~' '' dx ~ a2y' on the original ellipse, but lies a little above it or below it, according to the Bign of dy; i. e. it is a point of another ellipse, which second ellipse depends on the variation of the part of c corresponding to the variation of y. And now suppose x to vary, y being constant, in consequence of which the other part of c, which has a variation due to the variation of x, changes, but changes in such a manner as to bring back the point to the original ellipse, the variations of the two parts of the constant being such that the sum of them is zero; whereas then the partial variation of the first carried the point off the ellipse, that of the second brought it back again. This case is exactly that of the total variation of a function of two variables, with the condition that the two partial variations are so related as to render the total variation equal to zero. x(z2—a2) {2y dx + xdy) — 2x2yzdz ■'• D" = (z2-a2)2" These results might have been deduced immediately in the same way as those of Ex. 4 and 5 in Art. 47. 50.] If the variables are so combined in an equation that no one is expressed explicitly in terras of the others, then we have an implicit function of many variables of the form *{x,y,z, ) = c; and therefore Dp = 0, whence may be determined the absolute variation of any one of them which is due to the variations of all the others; thus Similarly may be found the variation of any one of the variables which is due to the variation of any one of the others; thus, for instance, let it be required to find the relation between the corresponding variations of x and y in the equation *(*,y,z, ) = c, when the other variables do not change value; then ••• ^ = --^r-- (48) W Similarly the ratio of the corresponding variations of x and z are given by the equation . dx W (49) Now these results are useful in questions like the following: Suppose that there is an expression, + w where P, Q, R are functions of y and z; and that it expresses a property of the explicit function * = /(*,y), (51) where (^) and (^-J are the partial derived-functions of f(x,y); what is the equivalent form of (50), when (51) is put into the f0rm r(x,y,z) = 0? (52) From (52) we have • - W ~~ ~ (dr.' \dyl ~ ~ ,dr\' \dz> W and substituting these in (50), we have •(£)♦.($♦.©-. and this is the equivalent expression. The converse operation is performed by a similar process. It will be observed that we have hereby passed from (50) which is an unsymmetrical expression, to (53) which is symmetrical. 51.3 Differentiation of a function of many variables, some of which are dependent on the others. The principles of differentiation of functions of many variables which have been explained in the five immediately preceding Articles are general, whatever are the values of the variables; and therefore a fortiori they are applicable to the less general case in which the variables are connected with each other by certain given relations: for what is true in the most general case cannot but be true in the particular. Firstly let us take the most simple case, where u is a function of two variables, and of the form « = F (x, y); and let us suppose y to be a function of x, and of the form y = »); then we have Dm = (^np dx + (^) dy, and dy = f\x) dx; Dm (dr\ /dv\ Tx=\dx) + \dy^f{v)-' the meaning of the several terms of which expression is sufficiently obvious from their symbols. Ex. 1. u = tan-1-, and y = {a2—x*}t; ydx—xdy , xdx whence, substituting ^ {a2-*2}*' a result which is manifestly as it ought to be, if we consider that the relation between w and x, after the elimination of y, is x |