What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
47 East Tenth admiration ages ancient appear ARTHUR PENRHYN STANLEY artist Beacon Lights Caesar Carlyle century character Charlemagne contemporaries critics delight Doctor Lord's East Tenth St effect eloquence Emerson eminent empire England epoch essayist essays evil facts fiction Froude Gathered by JOHN genius George Eliot give Greek hero Herodotus historian HOWARD HULBERT imagination industry intellectual inventors James Anthony Froude judge laws lecturer literary literature Livy Lord Macaulay mankind manner Mardonius ment merely modern moral narration narrative nations natural never painting past peculiar perceive period philosophy of history picture Plato poets political Portrait principles produced Prophets RALPH WALDO EMERSON reader reason religion respect Roman says Shakspeare single sion Sir Walter Ralegh society speeches spirit statesmen story surpassed Tacitus talent tell theology things THOMAS BABINGTON MACAULAY thousand Thucydides tion tory transactions true truth volume warfare whole writer Xenophon
Page 65 - Fifth-monarchyman, the dreams, scarcely less wild, of the philosophic republican, — all these would enter into the representation, and render it at once more exact and more striking. The instruction derived from history thus written, would be of a vivid and practical character. It would be received by the imagination as well as by the reason. It would be not merely traced on the mind, but branded into it. Many truths, too, would be learned, which can be learned in no other manner. As the history...
Page 55 - They are not achieved by armies, or enacted by senates. They are sanctioned by no treaties, and recorded in no archives. They are carried on in every school, in every church, behind ten thousand counters, at ten thousand firesides. The upper current of society presents no certain criterion by which we can judge of the direction in which the under current flows.
Page 51 - Hume is an accomplished advocate. Without positively asserting much more than he can prove, he gives prominence to all the circumstances which support his case; he glides lightly over those which are unfavourable to it; his own witnesses are applauded and encouraged; the statements which seem to throw discredit on them are controverted; the contradictions into which they fall are explained away; a clear and connected abstract of their evidence is given. Everything that is offered on the other side...
Page 55 - A history in which every particular incident may be true may on the whole be false. The circumstances which have most influence on the happiness of mankind, the changes of manners and morals, the transition of communities from poverty to wealth, from knowledge to ignorance, from ferocity to humanity—these are, for the most part, noiseless revolutions.
Page 33 - Of the Latin historians, Tacitus was certainly the greatest. His style indeed is not only faulty in itself, but is, in some respects, peculiarly unfit for historical composition. He carries his love of effect far beyond the limits of moderation. He tells a fine story finely: but he cannot tell a plain story plainly. .He stimulates till all stimulants lose their power.
Page 52 - While our historians are practising all the arts of controversy, they miserably neglect the art of narration, the art of interesting the affections and presenting pictures to the imagination.
Page 29 - No historian with whom we are acquainted has shown so complete an indifference to truth. He seems to have cared only about the picturesque effect of his book, and the honour of his country. On the other hand, we do not know, in the whole range of literature, an instance of a bad thing so well done. The painting of the narrative is beyond description vivid and graceful.
Page 54 - Spain, who died a martyr to ceremony because the proper dignitaries were not at hand to render him assistance. That history would be more amusing if this etiquette were relaxed will, we suppose, be acknowledged. But would it be less dignified or less useful ? What do we mean when we say that one past event is important and another insignificant? No past event has any intrinsic importance. The knowledge of it is valuable only as it leads us to form just calculations with respect to the future.
Page 61 - The early part of our imaginary history would be rich with coloring from romance, ballad, and chronicle. We should find ourselves in the company of knights such as those of Froissart, and of pilgrims such as those who rode with Chaucer from the Tabard. Society would be shown from the highest to the lowest, — from the royal cloth of state to the den of the outlaw; from the throne of the Legate to the chimney-corner where the begging friar regaled himself. Palmers, minstrels, crusaders, — the stately...