The Journal of the Bihar Research Society, Volume 5 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 87
Page 28
Cunningham has taken these to be the names of the respective kings . But they are given in the Nepal dynastic lists as Mána Deva and Guņa Deva . I would therefore read these two legends as “ the anka ( mark ) of Sri Māna ” and “ the ...
Cunningham has taken these to be the names of the respective kings . But they are given in the Nepal dynastic lists as Mána Deva and Guņa Deva . I would therefore read these two legends as “ the anka ( mark ) of Sri Māna ” and “ the ...
Page 35
I have taken the animal ( Fig . 7 ) to be a lion , rather than a tiger , on account of the comparatively large size of the head . Tkera is , however , no attempt to indicate the mane , as is dono in the examples of that animal on later ...
I have taken the animal ( Fig . 7 ) to be a lion , rather than a tiger , on account of the comparatively large size of the head . Tkera is , however , no attempt to indicate the mane , as is dono in the examples of that animal on later ...
Page 82
Gaya inscription appears to be rather too late for the sixth century and therefore that of the Aphsand inscription may be taken to be a fixed point . It may safely be asserted now that the Puri - Kushan coins were issued some time ...
Gaya inscription appears to be rather too late for the sixth century and therefore that of the Aphsand inscription may be taken to be a fixed point . It may safely be asserted now that the Puri - Kushan coins were issued some time ...
Page 86
Firozābād , a mint very well known from the coins of the Independent Sultans of Bengal , from the time of Sultan Shamsuddin Ilyas Shāh , has been generally taken to be Pandua , but no definite proof has ever been adduced in favour of ...
Firozābād , a mint very well known from the coins of the Independent Sultans of Bengal , from the time of Sultan Shamsuddin Ilyas Shāh , has been generally taken to be Pandua , but no definite proof has ever been adduced in favour of ...
Page 88
One of them , which was still imbedded in the original site , Buchanan had taken out and removed , about 1812. The other he rescued from the bed of the Ganges to which it had been dedicated by the citizens .
One of them , which was still imbedded in the original site , Buchanan had taken out and removed , about 1812. The other he rescued from the bed of the Ganges to which it had been dedicated by the citizens .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
according additional ancient animal appears army Bahadur bear belong Bengal Bihar body Buddhist Calcutta called carried caste century ceremony charms cloth coins described district Ditto ditto dots edition elephant English evidence examination facing fact figure five four give given grant hands head Hill India inscription interesting Jafar Khan Journal Khan king known later leaves letter Maharajah March mark means Meer Mohammad Kasim meet mentioned Mohammad Kasim Khan Museum Nagpur Nawab object obverse offerings officers original Orissa Patna period person Plate portion present probably received record referred regarded remaining represent reverse rice round sent shows side similar Society statues stone SUB-CLASS taken temple Translation tree village whole