Page images

cin the Dactylus on the second, and in the Anapastus on the third or last syllable *.

Hence on Arist. Plut. 965. for — Twv év 1 dobi za laccu ! Tiva, Dawes prefers the Baroc. MS. lection, fvdchev, in order that the Ictus may not fall on the final syllable of a trisyllabic word, vdobi, and adds: “ Severiores Musas coluisse video poetas Atticos, quàm quæ in vocis hyperdisyllabæ ultimam correptam cadere paterentur.Misc. Crit. p. 211 t.

Let us try a few of the Aldine examples which Mr. Wakefield has cited in defence of his Canon : Diatribe, p. 5. and 36. Hecub. 232. 'Ovdu neti pe Zeus, tpepál Caws opw.

178. 'Ει τις γυναικας των πριν ειρηκέ κακως. Silv. Crit. I. p. 81.

288. Και τάσδ' ερώμαι τίνες εφέστασί δoμoις.
29ο. Ελληνικόισι δώμασι πελίζετε.

1440. Εισή Γαγέ σοφίσμομίλια χθονος. All these five instances are in direct contradiction to Dawes's Canon; for in each of these verses the Ictus must fall on the final short syllable of words which are hyperdisyllabic. In our opinion, however, Dawes's Canon is eminently right: it is founded on truth and reason. An Epsilon, terminating a word of three or four syllables, is too feeble a letter to bear the stress or Ictus, which must necessarily be placed on some particular syllables in every line, in order to give to it the elasticity and spring which every metre demands. The position of this Ictus is the characteristic mark which distinguishes one species of verse from another, and verse itself from prose.

What confusion, it may be added, would arise in several Iambics, if the final N were neglected! For example, how would this line be divided :

Ουδείς έπλούθησε ταχεως δίκαιος ών. Menander apud Stob. Grot. Fl. X. p. 69. and p. 276. of the unfinished Stobæus of Nic. Schow.- Whether the third foot of this line be disyllabic, or trisyllabic, the Ictus must fall on the oɛ, the final syllable of an hyperdisyllabic word; which is impossible.- Read é ao útnoev, and the difficulty or impracticability of scansion is removed; and the Ictus rests on a syllable lengthened by position. Again :

“Ο δε μ' ήκολούθησε μέχρι τα προς την θύραν. Menander apud Hermog. de Invent. IV.-In this verse, the omitted N produced exactly the same error and ambiguity.

# The Proceleusmaticus is not an admissible foot in Iambics.
f Conferend, etiam p. 320.
Z 3


Read, 5x076 vencev, as by accident it is published by Joannes
Euripides, Cyclops. 144.

'Εν σέλμασι νεώς ισλιν, ή φέρεις ου νιν; The editions rightly give oinpaow; which added N enables the last syllable of the trisyllabic to support the Ictus. So in this Trochaic verse in Ipheg. in Taur. 1241.

Τοις τα πλειον ειδόσι θεοις σόι τε σημαινω θεά. In the second Dipodia, the words érdcoi beois do not form a legitimate Trochau: and Anapæstus; for in this metre, when an Anapæse tus assumes the place of the Trochæus, the regular foot, the Ictus niust be made on the first of its three syllables. Thus: úve answering to us The true reading isiidéos Geois and Orois must be pronounced monosyllabice. --Farther illustration siems unnecessary.

There is still one point of view in which this Canon of Mr, Wakefield must be considered. He asserts that a short vowel at the close of a word is lengthened, ob vim pausæ in syllabá postremá vocis, at the end of a foot in Anapesticis et lambicis, and in the beginning of a foot in Heroicis; and that the final Nis unnecessary in such situations.

Ernesti, as was remarked, observes, in Ham. Il. A'. 2. that in tle Florentine and first Aldine Homer the final N is gene. rally omitted, in medio versil, ubi syllaba ultimia est in Gæsurâ.

Mr. Wakefield appears to suppose that the Cæsura in lambics is different from the Casura in Heroics; for he assigns one place, namely, the close of the foot, for the influence of the [Cesural) pause in the former metre ; and another, that is, the beginning of the foot, for the same influence in the latter.

The lambic metre of the Tragic Poets (for we must confine our remarks to that alone) has two Incisions, or toucm. The first is the Incisio mctrica, by which the verse may be divided into single feet, or Dipedia, as : Orest. I.

Ouxio I lov ou l óvoso I yov WO | IT EIV | Toç. The second is the Incisio Cæsurarum, by which the rhythm of the metre is regulated *: Oum lichiu iud er der ov wd? {orev F70s.

Bentley * Su Bentley. It was our wish to have proceeded to some length in the illustration of the incisions of the lanıbic metre: but the enormous ex. tent of this article compels us to omit what might have proved, perhaps, of some slight utility to those who are desirous of entering deeply into

me excellencies of the antient tragedians. We may, how. ever, refer them to the observations of the old Grammarians, pub



Bentley observes, Schediasm. de Metris Terentianis : OMNE versuum genus suam habet CÆSURAM sive IncisioNEM, qua verbum terminatur, et vox in decursu paulum interquiescit.

In the Dactylic Heroic Hexameter, this pause frequently appears to lengthen a final short syllable, which falls in the Ceesura ; that is, a short syllable which closes a word and begins a foot. In Iambic verse, such a power of elongation could never be allowed to the Cesural pause ; for the first syllable of every foot, from the nature and constitution of the metre, may be short; and must necessarily be short, in three of the six feet of which the Senarian is composed.

If the Cesural pause were to have effect at the end of the foot, in this metre, the rhythmus of lambics would be totally lost; and we might expect verses in which cach Dipodia would consist of two disyllables, or of one quadrisyllable: but no such verses, unless in corrupt instances, appear in the Tragedies. They would, indeed, be ranked among the xaxouerpa by the old Grammarian Trypho, whom Mr. Burgess has cited in his remarks on Dawes, M. Cr. 441. His whole note merits an attentive perusal.

It is curious to observe that, much in the same manner in which Mr. Wakefield has tried to confine the power of the pause in lengthening short vowels, to the last syllable of the foot, in Tragic lambics, John CORNELIUS De Pauw has attempted to fix it on the last syllable of the foot in Heroic Hexameters. This doctrine he has promulgated in several of his notes on Quintus Calaber; and he has been very justly reprehended for advancing such an opinion, by Dorville, in his Critica Vannus, p. 318 et seq.

De Pauw had also, long before the appearance of his Quintus Calaber, thus remarked on a verse which he palms on Men nander:

Αρκαδικός αν τουναντίον αλίσκείας (p. 176. Ed. Cler. and apud Athen. IV, p. 132.) after he had scornfully rejected Bentley's corrections; “ Nam quod tu fortè

[ocr errors]

lished by Putschius: to the decisions of Bentley, in his tract on the metres of Terence; to those of Dawes and his learned editor Burgess; and to the remarks in the Crit. Vann. of Dorville, on the subject of the Cesural pause and power, in Heroic Hexameters and Iambics. The sentiments of Dorville, indeed, are interlarded with a degree

of rility and abuse which is unpardonable in a philological work. De Pauw merited not compassion; for he was arrogant, abusive, precipitate, and totally without judgment :-yet his blunders might have been corrected, by his adversary, without a forfeiture of that civilized character which becomes the profound scholar and the genuine critic.

Z 4


ignoras, ego una cum Eruditioribus scio, ultima in rouvavlov PRODUCITUR propter spiritum asperum in voce chimxela, et vim CæSURE.”—We assert, as we have on some former occasion observed, that the spiritus asper has no power, nor influence, which can lengthen a preceding short final vowel.

Instead of offering any observations on this note of de Pauw, we shall transcribe Dorville's remarks on it, from his Critica Vann. p. 327

“ Vi cæsuræ toúvarlioy producitur, ubi ne quidem umbra cæsura est! Sane secundam in trimetro Iambo video in ultima hujus vocis finiri, Casuram nullam deprehendo quin, Metricorum stolidissime, nescis căsuram in lambico nunquam aliquid posse operari ad producen. dam syllabam. Nam casus in hoc carmine nequit dari, ut syllaba, in quam cæsura cadit, cum natura sit brevis, ob versum fieri longa debeat. Nam nihil vetat, quo minus brevis maneat.

Imo rectius brevis, quam longa, in omni casu erit.

* Si in hoc tuo versu fingere velis, syllabam On posse produci beneficio finitæ nimeoias, vei, quam BARNESIUS sæpe crepat, vi finalis, fingas hoc

Imo quonium lambicus ter feritur secunui in 7 erentianum, p. 94. contende ultimam cujusque diw ous posse procuci non modo, verum etiam ultimum cujusque pedis, quoniam Horatius H. P. V s. 253. ait Jamlum senos ictus rcddere, et EVERTE OMNEM PROSODIAM."

The quotation is long, but it is too closely allied to the sub. ject before us to admit abbreviation. With it we shall conclude ; for it seems unnecessary to pursue this topic farther. In the arguments and proofs which have been advanced, we have endeavoured to evince that Mr. Porson, when he inserted the final N in his edition of the Hecuba, instead of rendering himself liable to censure, deserved the praise of the learned reader.

We have been desirous of shewing, in opposition to the 15sertions of Mr. Wakefield, that the omission of ihe final N, when a long syllable is demanded, is not sanctioned in Euripides by the authority of Aldus; and that it is not established by the steady practice of any other editor, nor by the metrical rules of any critic or grammarian, antient or modern *. We


per me licet.

* The great Bentlcy's opinion on this subject, though he has ex. pressed it rather carelessly, n ay be collected from the following passage; in which he begins the examination of the defective Anapestics which Mr. Boyle had produced against the critic's and Terentian's famous Caron:

I. Την Διος αλήν εισαιχνευση
Aviny nai-

Prom. 122. and the IVth like it,

Τον δε χαλιους και τετρίνοισι
Ver. 565.

« These

have aimed at demonstrating that, if such a rejection were to be adopted, it would render the scansion (and, indeed, the rhythm) of several verses doubtful; and that it would totally annihilate the laws by which the Incisio Cæsurarum, and the consequent pause of the voice, are regulated in the Greek tragedies :-the most admirable of all the compositions which have escaped the ravages of time, and the still more levelling destruction of barbarism.

It was originally intended, after an examination of Mr. Wakefield's Diatribe, to have presented our readers with an ample account of Mr. Porson's editions of the Hecuba and Orestes. At that time, however, we had formed no just estimate of the number of pages which this critique would occupy; nor how much our undertaking would trespass on the patience of those readers, who consider the Monthly Review as a vehicle of general information. To these, any unusually large portion of classical investigation must in course appear tedious; as the variety of the materials, of which our work is usually composed, forms in their opinion one of its first excellencies. It is incumbent on us, therefore, to comprise in as short a compass as possible our concluding remarks:

• The Critic's laws the Critic's patrons give;

For we, who live to please, must please to live." With regard to the general merits then of these two plays, our learned friends may form a very just notion, by duly

“ These two verses, as our Examiner imagines, are ended with a Trochee, the last syllable being short. Now methinks a man of half the learning of Mr. Boyle might have known, that or may be long here, by adding N to it before a consonant, as poets frequently do : εισιχνευσιν, σέλινοισιν. “ This very fable, that Mr. B. quotes, might have taught him ;

'Εφαριδαισί θέλξει λερίας. V. 173. or that verse in Supplic.

'Ομεροφόροισι τ' ανέμους αγρίας. V. 36. or these of Aristopban.

Anor daring his üvana v dvori. Plut.

'Ιαιρός ών και μαύθις ως φασι σοφος. Νub. " In all which places, and a hundred more that it's easie to allege, the syllable on is long; as if it were pronounced, iwaodanow, bu@copsροισεί, αλεί, and φασί.

And these examples are all found in the middle of verses, lest the Examiner should make any exceptions, if they were at the end of Anapasts."

Bentley's meaning is plain, but the expression is deficient. The words should have been written as they were pronounced ; and as the final n was requisite in speaking these verses, it should have been added by the transcriber and printer.


« PreviousContinue »