Page images
PDF
EPUB

another piece of pewter of the same size and shape as Rr intended to represent the lower surface of those organs. The whole part ABCDE is covered with a piece of sheep's skin leather.

410] In making experiments with this instrument, or artificial torpedo as I shall call it, after having kept it in water of about the same saltness as that of the sea, till thoroughly soaked, I fastened the end of one of the wires, that not represented in the drawing for example, to the negative side of a large battery, and when it was sufficiently charged, touched the positive side with the end of the wire Ww; by which means the battery was discharged through the torpedo: for as the wires were inclosed in glass tubes, which extended about an inch beyond the end of the wood FG no electricity could pass from the positive side of the battery to the negative, except by flowing along the wire Ww to the pewter Rr, and thence either through the substance of the wood, or along the wet leather, to the opposite piece of pewter, and thence along the other wire to the negative side. When I would receive a shock myself, I employed an assistant to charge the battery, and when my hands were in the proper position, to discharge it in the above mentioned manner by means of the wire Ww. In experiments with this torpedo under water, I made use of a wooden trough; and as the strength of the shock may, perhaps, depend in some measure on the size of the trough, and on the manner in which the torpedo lies in it, I have, in Fig. 4, Fig. 4.

E

B

given a vertical section of it; the torpedo being placed in the same situation as in the figure. ABCDE is the trough; the length BC is 19 inches; the depth AB is 14; and the breadth is 13; consequently, as the torpedo is two inches thick in the thickest part, there is about 5 inches distance between its sides and those of the trough.

411] The battery was composed of 49 jars, of extremely thin glass, disposed in 7 rows, and so contrived that I could use any number of rows I chose. The outsides of the jars were coated with tinfoil; but as it would have been very difficult to have coated the insides in that manner, they were filled with salt water. In a battery to answer the purpose for which this was intended, it is evidently necessary that the metals serving to make the communications between the different jars should be joined quite close accordingly care was taken that the contacts should be made as perfect as possible. I find, by trial, that each row of the battery contains about 15 times as much electricity, when both are connected to the same prime conductor, as a plate of crown glass, the area of whose coating is 100 square inches, and whose thickness is 55 of an inch; that is, such that one square foot of it shall weigh 10 oz. 12 dwts.; and consequently, the whole battery contains about 110 times as much electricity as this plate*.

1000

412] The way by which this was determined, and which, I think, is one of the easiest methods of comparing the quantity of electricity which different batteries will receive with the same degree of electrification, was this: First of all, supposing a jar or battery to be electrified till the balls of the above-mentioned electrometer separated to a given distance, I found how much they would separate when the quantity of electricity in that jar or battery was reduced to one-half. To do this, I took two jars, as nearly equal as possible, and electrified one of them till the balls separated to a given degree, and then communicated its electricity to the other; and observed to what distance the balls separated after this communication. It is plain, that if the jars were exactly equal, this would be the distance sought for; as in that case the quantity of electricity in the first jar would be just half as much after the communication as before; but as I could not be sure that they were exactly equal, I repeated the experiment by

* I find, by experiment, that the quantity of electricity which coated glass of different shapes and sizes will receive with the same degree of electrification, is directly as the area of the coating, and inversely as the thickness of the glass; whence the proportion which the quantity of electricity in this battery bears to that in a glass or jar of any other size, may easily be computed. [See Art. 584. The charge of the first row of jars was 64538, and that of the whole battery about 481000 inches of electricity.]

electrifying the second jar, communicating its electricity to the first, and observing how far the balls separated; the mean between these two distances will evidently be the degree of separation sought, though the jars were not of the same size. Having found this, I electrified one row of the battery till the balls separated to the first distance, and repeatedly communicated its electricity to the plate of coated crown glass, taking care to discharge the plate each time before the communication was made, till it appeared by the electrometer, that the quantity of electricity in that row was reduced to one-half. I found it necessary to do this between 11 or 12 times, or 11 times as I estimate it. Whence the quantity of electric fluid in the row may be thus determined.

413] Let the quantity in the plate be to that in the row as x to 1; it is plain, that the electricity in the row will be diminished each time it is communicated to the plate, in the proportion of 1 to 1+x, and consequently after being communicated 11 times will be reduced in the proportion of 1 to (1+x)11;

1

therefore, (1+x)=2; and 1+x=2. Whence the value of x may easily be found by logarithms. But the readiest way of computing it, and which is exact enough for the purpose, is this: multiply the number of times which you communicated the electricity of the row to the plate, by 1,444; and from the product subtract the fraction; the remainder is equal to or the number of times by which the electricity in the row exceeds that in the plate*.

1

[ocr errors]

414] The way by which I estimated the strength of the charge given to the battery, was taking a certain number of jars, and electrifying them till the balls of the electrometer separated to a given distance, and then communicating their electricity to the battery. This method proved very convenient; for by using always the same jars, I was sure to give always the same charge with great exactness; and by varying the number and size of the jars, I could vary the charge at pleasure, and besides could estimate pretty nearly the proportion of the different charges to each other. It was also the only convenient method which occurred to me; for I could not have done it conveniently by charging the [Arts. 411, 582.]

[ocr errors]

whole battery till an electrometer suspended from it separated to a given distance; because in most of the experiments the electricity was so weak, that a pair of fine pith balls suspended from the battery would separate only to a very small distance; and counting the number of revolutions of the electrical machine is a very fallacious method.

415] I found, upon trial*, that though a shock might be procured from this artificial torpedo, while held under water, yet there was too great a disproportion between its strength, when received this way, and in air; for if I placed one hand on the upper, and the other on the lower surface of the electric organs, and gave such a charge to the battery, that the shock, when received in air, was as strong as, I believe, that of the real torpedo commonly is; it was but just perceptible when received under water. By increasing the charge, indeed, it became considerable; but then this charge would have given a much greater shock out of water than the torpedo commonly does. The water used in this experiment was of about the same degree of saltness as that of the sea; that being the natural element of the torpedo, and what Mr Walsh made his experiments with. It was composed of one part of common salt dissolved in 30 of water, which is the proportion of salt usually said to be contained in sea water. It appeared also, on examination, to conduct electricity not sensibly better or worse than some sea water procured from a mineral water warehouse. It is remarkable, that if I used fresh water instead of salt, the shock seemed very little weaker, when received under water than out; which not only confirms what was before said, that salt water conducts much better than fresh; but, I think, shews, that the human body is also a much better conductor than fresh water: for otherwise the shock must have been much weaker when received under fresh water than in air.

416] As there appeared to be too great a disproportion between the strength of the shock in water and in air, I made another torpedot, exactly like the former, except that the part ABCDE instead of wood was made of several pieces of thick leather, such as is used for the soles of shoes, fastened one over the other, and cut into the proper shape; the pieces of pewter [Arts. 599, 600.]

[Art. 596.]

being fixed on the surface of this, as they were on the wood, and the whole covered with sheep skin like the other. As the leather, when thoroughly soaked with salt water, would suffer the electricity to pass through it very freely, I was in hopes that I should find less difference between the strength of the shock in water and out of it, with this than with the other.

417] For suppose that in receiving the shock of the former torpedo under water, the quantity of electricity which passed through the wood and leather of the torpedo, through my body, and through the water, were to each other as T, B, and W*; the quantity of electricity which would pass through my body, when the shock was received under water, would be to that which would pass through it, when the shock was received out of water, B B as in the first case, the quantity which B+T+W B+T'

as

to

would pass through my body would be the

B

B+T part.

[blocks in formation]

the whole; and in the latter the Suppose now, that the latter torpedo conducts N times better than the former; and consequently, that in receiving its shock under water, the quantity of electricity which passes through the torpedo, through my body, and through the water, are to each other as NT, B, and W; the quantity of electricity which will now pass through my body, when the shock is received under water, and out of water, will be to each other as

B

to

B

B+NT+ W B+NT; which two quan

tities differ from each other in a less proportion than

B

B

B+T+W

and B+T: consequently, the readier the body of the torpedo

conducts, the greater charge will it require to give the same shock, either in water or out of it; but the less will be the difference between the strength of the two shocks. It should be observed, that this alteration, so far from making it less resembling the real torpedo, in all probability makes it more so; for I see no reason to think, that the real torpedo is a worse conductor of electricity than other animal bodies; and the human body is at least as good, if not a much better conductor than this new torpedo.

- [Arts. 597, 598.]

« PreviousContinue »