Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

action, irders."

tary 20,

Sep 9. 22h 37m GMT.

July 24. 17h 23′′ GMT.

↳, nearly Bridges 1 of cer

› girder, ction of

of these id upon asidered

enerally

wed the h being eight of

e to the x times rength. ny were tion neflanges, esult of

rtioned

rupture
hanced

a led to anship. he first

⚫ led to

by the

eaviest inciple

J. Basure lith

ciently

is well

the Lisbo

dent force
correspon

lute time 1

The di

greater at

The Ke

the eleme

reversed in

vertical fo

The wri

alluded to extensive

and of gre: communic

power to c

this Societ

vestigation

Increasi creasing h

The fol

diagrams:

Horizonta

Dittc

Dittc

Ditto

Declinatio

Vertical fo

[ocr errors]

February 4, 1864.

Major-General SABINE, President, in the Chair.

The following communication was read :—

"Experiments to determine the effects of impact, vibratory action,

and a long-continued change of Load on Wrought-iron Girders.” By WILLIAM FAIRBAIRN, LL.D., F.R.S. Received January 20, 1864.

(Abstract.)

The author observes that the experiments which were undertaken, nearly twenty years ago, to determine the strength and form of the Tubular Bridges which now span the Conway and Menai Straits, led to the adoption of certain forms of girder, such as the tubular, the plate, and the lattice girder, and other forms founded on the principle developed in the construction of these bridges. It was at first designed that the ultimate strength of these structures should be six times the heaviest load that could ever be laid upon them, after deducting half the weight of the tubes. This was considered a fair margin of strength; but subsequent considerations, such as generally attend a new principle of construction with an untried material, showed the expediency of increasing it; and instead of the ultimate strength being six times, it was in some instances increased to eight times the weight of the greatest load.

The proved stability of these bridges gave increased confidence to the engineer and the public, and for several years the resistance of six times the heaviest load was considered an amply sufficient provision of strength. But a general demand soon arose for wrought-iron bridges, and many were made without due regard to first principles, or to the law of proportion necessary to be observed in the sectional areas of the top and bottom flanges, so clearly and satisfactorily shown in the early experiments. The result of this was the construction of weak bridges, many of them so ill-proportioned in the distribution of the material as to be almost at the point of rupture with little more than double the permanent load. The evil was enhanced by the erroneous system of contractors tendering by weight, which led to the introduction of bad iron, and in many cases equally bad workmanship. The deficiencies and break-downs which in this way followed the first successful application of wrought iron to the building of bridges led to doubts and fears as to their security. Ultimately it was decided by the Board of Trade that in wrought-iron bridges the strain with the heaviest load should not exceed 5 tons per square inch; but on what principle this standard was established does not appear.

The requirement of 5 tons per square inch did not appear sufficiently definite to secure in all cases the best form of construction. It is well

VOL. XIII.

L

known that the powers of resistance to strain in wrought iron are widely different, according as we apply a force of tension or compression; it is even possible so to disproportion the top and bottom areas of a wrought-iron girder calculated to support six times the rolling load, as to cause it to yield with little more than half the ultimate strain or 10 tons on the square inch. For example, in wrought-iron girders with solid tops it requires the sectional area in the top to be nearly double that of the bottom to equalize the two forces of tension and compression; and unless these proportions are strictly adhered to in the construction, the 5-ton strain per square inch is a fallacy which may lead to dangerous errors. Again, it was ascertained from direct experiment that double the quantity of material in the top of a wroughtiron girder was not the most effective form for resisting compression. On the contrary, it was found that little more than half the sectional area of the top, when converted into rectangular cells, was equivalent in its powers of resistance to double the area when formed of a solid top plate. This discovery was of great value in the construction of tubes and girders of wide span, as the weight of the structure itself (which increases as the cubes, and the strength only as the squares) forms an important part of the load to which it is subjected. On this question it is evident that the requirements of a strain not exceeding 5 tons per square inch cannot be applied in both cases, and the rule is therefore ambiguous as regards its application to different forms of structure. In that rule, moreover, there is nothing said about the dead weight of the bridge; and we are not informed whether the breakingweight is to be so many times the applied weight plus the multiple of the load, or, in other words, whether it includes or is exclusive of the weight of the bridge itself.

These data are wanting in the railway instructions; and until some fixed rinciple of construction is determined upon, accompanied by a standard measure of strength, it is in vain to look for any satisfactory results in the erection of road and railway bridges composed entirely of wrought iron.

The author was led to inquire into this subject with more than ordinary care, not only on account of the imperfect state of our knowledge, but from the want of definite instructions. In the following experimental researches he has endeavoured to ascertain the extent to which a bridge or girder of wrought iron may be strained without injury to its ultimate powers of resistance, or the exact amount of load to which a bridge may be subjected without endangering its safety-in other words, to determine the fractional strain of its estimated powers of resistance.

To arrive at correct results and to imitate as nearly as possible the strain to which bridges are subjected by the passage of heavy trains, the apparatus specially prepared for the experiments was designed to lower the load quickly upon the beam in the first instance, and next to produce a considerable amount of vibration, as the large lever with its load and shackle was left suspended upon it, and the apparatus was sufficiently elastic for that purpose.

The girder subjected to vibration in these experiments was a wrought-iron plate beam of 20 feet clear span, and of the following dimensions :

:

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

The beam having been loaded with 6643 lbs., equivalent to one-fourth of the ultimate breaking-weight, the experiments commenced as follows:

Experiment I.

Experiment on a wrought-iron beam with a changing load equivalent to one-fourth of the breaking-weight.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

The beam having undergone about half a million changes of load by working continuously for two months night and day, at the rate of about eight changes per minute, without producing any visible alteration, the load was increased from one-fourth to two-sevenths of the statical breakingweight, and the experiments were proceeded with till the number of changes of load reached a million.

Experiment II.

Experiment on the same beam with a load equivalent to two-sevenths of the breaking weight, or nearly 3 tons.

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »