Page images
PDF
EPUB

CHAPTER XIII.

MISCELLANEOUS THEOREMS AND EXAMPLES.

145. Mathematical Induction. A method of proof, ordinarily called mathematical induction, is frequently employed in the demonstration of mathematical propositions. The method is best explained through its application to simple examples.

Ex. 1.

The following equations are evidently true:

1+ 3 = 422,

1+ 3 + 5 = 9 = 32,

1 + 3 + 5 + 7 = 16 = 42,

1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 = 25 = 52;

and they at once suggest that perhaps the sum of the first n odd numbers is equal to n2. Let us assume provisionally that it is. This hypothesis algebraically expressed is

[blocks in formation]

in which n is an integer and equal to the number of terms in the

sum.

To both sides of this equation add 2 n + 1. The result of the addition is

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

and shows that if the sum of the first n odd numbers is n2, then the sum of the first n + 1 odd numbers is (n + 1)2.

But the formula above written is obviously true when n = 1 and when n = = 2; hence it is true when n = 3. And being true when

n = 3, it is true when n = 4, and so on indefinitely. It is therefore true when n is any integer whatever.

Thus the proposition that the sum of the first n odd integers is equal to n2 is proved.

Ex. 2. Let it be proposed to find the sum of the first ʼn natural numbers. We begin by writing down the following equations, which are evidently true:

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 = 15 = ≥ · 5 (5 + 1).

They at once suggest that perhaps the sum of the first n integers is in (n + 1). We accordingly assume, provisionally, that

1+ 2+ 3+ 4+ • + n = 1 n (n + 1).

Adding n + 1 to both sides of this hypothetical equation, we obtain 1+2+3+ + n + n + 1 = } n2 + } n + n + 1

[blocks in formation]

a result which shows that if n (n + 1) is the sum of the first n integers, then (n + 1)(n+2) is the sum of the first n + 1 integers.

But the formula is obviously true when n = 1; hence it is true when n = 2. And being true when n = 2, it is true when n=3, and so on indefinitely. It is therefore true, whatever integer n may represent.

These examples may suffice to explain a method of proof that will be made use of, as occasion requires, in subsequent pages of this book. If its logical rigor be not at first entirely evident to the student, a careful study of its applications in a few examples that require its use should remove the doubt.

Ex. 3. Prove that the sum of the first n even integers is n(n+1).

Ex. 4. Prove that the sum of the squares of the first n integers is } n (n + 1) (2 n + 1).

Ex. 5. Prove that

1.2+2.3+3.4+

...

+ n (n + 1) = }} n (n + 1) (n + 2).

146. The term induction does not correctly describe the above method of proof. In the natural sciences the true method of induction is used for the purpose of inferring the universality of natural laws from particular manifestations of their truth in natural phenomena. It does not seek to attain absolute certainty, but achieves its object as soon as it establishes a high degree of probability.

The so-called method of mathematical induction, however, is as logically rigorous as any other process in mathematics. It is more correctly described as reasoning by progressive transformations, in which the uniqueness of an algebraic form persists, monomorphic transformations, or monomorphosis.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

147. Theorem. The expression xn xa for all positive integral values of n. It is known that x α, x2 — a2, and æ3 ble by x-a.

a" is divisible by

a3 are all divisi

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

= x2−1 (x − a) + a (xn−1 — an−1). Now, if x - a divides n-1 - an-1, it will also divide

[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Hence, if x - a divides a―1 — a”-1, it will also divide

xn-an.

But we know that a a divides a3 - as; it will therefore also divide at at. And, since x a divides a1 — a1, it will also divide a3. And so on indefinitely. x

Hence "a" is divisible by x

tive integer [Art. 145].

[ocr errors]

-a, when n is any posi

Since "+a" = x” — a” +2a”, it follows that when 2"+a" is divided by x a the remainder is 2a", so that "a" is never divisible by x

[ocr errors]

-a.

If we change a into ―a, x-a becomes x-(-a)=x+a; also "a" becomes a"-(-a)"; and x" — (− a)" is x+a" or " a" according as n is odd or even. Hence, when n is odd,

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

We have in the above shown that the four cases are all included in the first: we leave it as an exercise for the student to prove each case separately.

The above results may be written so as to show the quotients: thus

M

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][merged small][merged small]

the upper or lower signs being taken on each side of the second formula according as n is odd or even.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

7. Find the factors of x2 - 2xy - 8 y2 − 2 x + 20 y − 8.

[ocr errors]

8. Find the factors of a2 - b2 + c2 — ƒ2 −2 ac - 2 bf.

9. Write down the quotient in each of the following divisions: (i.) (x3 — y3) ÷ (x − y), (ii.) (x2 + y2) ÷ (x + y),

[blocks in formation]

10. Show that, if n is any positive integer, 7" — 1 is divisible by 6; show also that 352n+1 + 1 is divisible by 36.

11. Show without actual division that

(3 x2 − 2 x + 1)3 − (2 x2 + 3 x − 5)3

is divisible by x2-5x+6.

12. Write down the result of dividing (2a + 3b)3 + (3 a +2b)3 by 5 a + 5b.

13. Write down the result of dividing

(2a + 4b - 4 c) 3 + ( a − b + 7 c)3 by a + b + c.

14. Show that (1 − x)2 is a factor of 1 − x x + x6.

« PreviousContinue »