Page images
PDF
EPUB

II

ΝΟΜΟΣ.

[Ἔστω δὲ καὶ ὑπόδικος τῶν ψευδομαρτυριῶν ὁ μαρτυρήσας αὐτοῦ τούτου, ὅτι μαρτυρεῖ παρὰ τὸν νόμον· καὶ ὁ προβαλόμενος κατὰ ταὐτά.]

Ἔτι τοίνυν κἂν ἀπὸ τοῦ γραμματείου γνοίη τις, ἐν ᾧ ἡ μαρτυρία γέγραπται, ὅτι τὰ ψευδῆ μεμαρτύρη κεν. λελευκωμένον τε γάρ ἐστι καὶ οἴκοθεν κατεσκευh‘immo δι' αὐτοῦ τούτου vel αὐτῷ τούτῳ Ζ. i Bekker cum Reiskio. αὐτοῦ τούτου] = κατ' αὐτὸ τοῦτο above.

ὁ προβαλόμενος κατὰ ταὐτά.] The person who produced the false witness, προβάλετο Οι προὐστήσατο, was liable to what was called a δίκη κακοτεχνιών for conspiring to defeat the ends of justice. Or. 47 § 1 τὸν προβαλόμενον ὑπόδικον ἔχῃ τῶν κακοτεχνιών.

§ 11. That the defendant's evidence is false may be concluded from the material on which it is written.

λελευκωμένον καὶ οἴκοθεν κατ εσκευασμένον.] The plaintiff curiously argues the falsehood of the defendant's deposition from the nature of the material on which it is inscribed. The document, he points out, is * whitened, and must have been brought from home purposely prepared.' This would have been proper enough for a deposition attesting to the facts of the past, in which case there is time to draw up an elaborate document, whereas a deposition purporting to attest a Challenge (evidence to which might be given by any duly qualified person even accidentally present) would naturally be rapidly written on the spot ἐν μάλθῃ, i. e. on a_waxen tablet, which would allow of any addition or erasure

[ocr errors]

προβαλλόμενος Ζ cum libris. being made at the request of the witnesses before they attested The difference between it. these methods,' as C. R. Kennedy remarks, was much the same as between writing with a pen on paper and with a pencil on a slate.' (Dict. Ant. s. v. μαρτυρία.) For λελευκωμένον cf. Dem. Or. 24 (Timocr.) § 23 Lex. ὁ τιθεὶς τὸν καινὸν νόμον, ἀναγράψας εἰς λεύκωμα, ἐκτιθέτω πρόσθε τῶν ἐπωνύμων. Bekker's Anecd. (λέξεις ῥητορικαί) p. 277 λεύκωμά ἐστι πίναξ γύψῳ ἀληλιμμένος, πρὸς γραφὴν πολιτικών γραμμάτων ἐπιτήδειος. (We may compare the Roman album and contrast the black boards of our class-rooms.) For ev μάλθῃ ib. p. 278. μάλθη με μαλαγμένος κηρὸς ἢ ἄλλο τι τοιοῦ τον, ᾧ τὰ γραμματεῖα πράττεται. Pollux: ὁ δὲ ἐνὼν τῇ πινακίδι (sc. καλεῖται) κηρὸς ἢ μάλθη ἢ μάλθα. Ηρόδοτος μὲν γὰρ κηρὸν εἴρηκεν, Κρατίνος δὲ ἐν τῇ Πυτίνη μάλθην ἔφη, ̓Αριστοφάνης δὲ ἐν τῷ Γηρυτάδῃ τὴν μάλθαν ἐκ τῶν γραμματείων ἤσθιον. Harpocr. μάλθη· ὁ μεμαλαγμένος κηρός· Δημοσθένης ἐν τῷ κατὰ Στεφάνου. Ἱππώναξ, ἔπειτα μάλθῃ τὴν τρόπιν παραχρίσας and similarly Hesychius and Suidas. (Becker's Charicles, Scene Ix. note 12 and Beels, diatribe p. 116-119).

οἴκοθεν κατεσκευασμένον] is a

I 2

ασμένον. καίτοι τοὺς μὲν τὰ πεπραγμένα μαρτυροῦντας προσήκει οἴκοθεν τὰς μαρτυρίας κατεσκευασμένας μαρτυρεῖν, τοὺς δὲ τὰς προκλήσεις μαρτυροῦντας τοὺς ἀπὸ ταὐτομάτου προστάντας ἐνκ μάλθῃ γεγραμμένην τὴν μαρτυρίαν, ἵν ̓, ἂν τι προσγράψαι ἢ ἀπαλείψαι βουληθῇ, ῥᾴδιον ᾖm.

Οὐκοῦν κατὰ μὲν ταῦτα πάντα ἐξελέγχεται τὰ ψευδή μεμαρτυρηκὼς καὶ παρὰ τὸν νόμον βούλομαι

[blocks in formation]

1 εἰ...βουληθῇ Z cum libris. • malim ἐβουλήθη vel βουληθείη Sauppe.

m

ἣν Ζ.

H. Wolf. 'pregnant' expression, equivalent in sense to οἴκοι κατεστ κευασμένον καὶ οἴκοθεν ἀπηνεγ μένον. Similarly below, where Reiske unnecessarily proposes οἴκοθεν ἐπιφερομένας τὰς μαρ τυρίας κατεσκευασμένας μαρτυρεῖν. For the general drift of the argument and its imputation of deliberate design cf. Cic. Phil. II. § 85 unde diadema? non enim abiectum sustuleras, sed attuleras domo meditatum et cogitatum scelus.

τοὺς προστάντας.] These words are rather obscure. Kennedy renders προστάντας as equivalent to παρόντας. Rather, perhaps, 'who stand forward voluntari1y.” Ρ.]

ἂν βουληθῇ.] The vulgata lectio used to be el, altered by G. H. Schaefer into ear to avoid the anomaly of el with the subjunctive, a construction described as 'poetical' in Bekker's Anecdota (p. 144) ; see, however, the commentators on Thuc. νι. 21. 1 εἰ ξυστώσιν, Hermann's Opuscula 1. 280 and Kühner's Gk. Gr. § 46, 11 p. 904. Isaeus Or. 11 (Hagnias) § 12 has μηδ' εἰ καὶ τετελευτηκότες ὦσιν and in Dem. Or. 24 §§ 79 and 93 we

have the ordinary indicative followed by the anomalous subjunctive, εἴ τινι... ...προστετίμηται ... ἢ τὸ λοιπὸν προστιμηθῇ, whereas in § 207 we find the regular construction eἴ τινι προστετίμη ται δεσμου κἂν τὸ λοιπόν τινι προστιμήσητε.

§§ 12-17. Further, my father made no will at all, nor do the laws allow it, laws which bind every citizen of Athens without exception. It was not until ten years after my father's death that Phormio obtained the citizenship ; not foreseeing this, how could my father have insulted our family, cast contempt on your bounty and disregarded the laws by giving his own wife in marriage to Phormio, and that by a will which he was legally incompetent to make? The law forbids a man's making a will if he have male issue lawfully begotten.—Again, the law only allows those who are not 'adopted' to dispose of their property by will, and my father was a citizen by adoption' only. Lastly, it does not permit a person to make a will if he is of unsound mind, and the terms of the alleged 'will' which give

[ocr errors]

δ ̓ ὑμῖν καὶ αὐτὸ τοῦτο ἐπιδεῖξαι, ὡς οὔτε διέθετο ὁ πατὴρ ἡμῶν διαθήκην οὐδεμίαν οὔθ ̓ οἱ νόμοι ἐῶσιν. εἰ γάρ τις ἔροιτο ὑμᾶς καθ ̓ ὁποίους νόμους δεῖ πολιτεύεσθαι ἡμᾶς, δῆλον ὅτι ἀποκρίναισθ ̓ ἂν κατὰ τοὺς κειμένους. ἀλλὰ μὴν οἵ γε νόμοι ἀπαγορεύουσι μηδὲ νόμον ἐξεῖναι ἐπ ̓ ἀνδρὶ θεῖναι, ἂν μὴ τὸν αὐτὸν ἐφ ̓ 13 ἅπασιν Αθηναίοις. οὐκοῦν ὁ μὲν νόμος οὑτοσὶ τοῖς αὐτοῖς νόμοις πολιτεύεσθαι ἡμᾶς κελεύει καὶ οὐκ ἄλλοις. ὁ δὲ πατὴρ ἐτελεύτησεν ἐπὶ Δυσνικήτου ἄρχοντος, ὁ δὲ Φορμίων ̓Αθηναῖος ἐγένετο ἐπὶ Νικοφήμου ἄρχοντος, δεκάτῳ ἔτει ὕστερον ἢ ὁ πατὴρ ἡμῶν ἀπέθανεν. πῶς ἂν οὖν μὴ εἰδὼς ὁ πατὴρ αὐτὸν ̓Αθηναῖον ἐσόμενον ἔδωκεν ἂν τὴν ἑαυτοῦ γυναῖκα, καὶ προεπηλάκισε μὲν ἂν ἡμᾶς, κατεφρόνησε δ ̓ ἂν τῆς δωρεάς 1133 ἧς παρ' ὑμῶν ἔλαβε, παρεῖδε δ ̓ ἂν τοὺς νόμους; πότερα δὲ κάλλιον ἦν αὐτῷ ζῶντι πρᾶξαι ταῦτα, εἴπερ

n Bekker (Berlin ed.).
Leipsig ed.) cum Σ.

my father's widow to Phormio
are inconsistent with the terms
of the lease,' and argue the
absence of sound mind and
therefore my father's incompe
tence to make any will whatever.

12. κειμένους...θεῖναι.] κεῖμαι
is constantly borrowed as a
perfect passive to τίθημι, while
τέθειμαι is almost invariably
used as a deponent perfect.
Thus the usage of the perfect
in the best writers would be:

ὁ νομοθέτης τέθεικε τὸν νόμον.
ἡ πόλις τέθειται τὸν νόμον.
ὁ νόμος κεῖται.

(See further in notes on Or.
34 § 16, Or. 39 Argument, line
23 and on Isocr. ad Dem. § 36.)

μηδὲ νόμον. ἐπ ̓ ἀνδρὶ θεῖναι.] Just as a privilegium was forbidden by Roman law, so at Athens legislation expressly affecting a particular individual, whether in his interest or to

ἐπ' ἀνδρὶ ἐξεῖναι Z et Bekker (st.

his detriment, was not allowed,
except in the single instance of
ostracism ; cf. the law quoted in
Andocides, de mysteriis § 87
μηδὲ ἐπ' ἀνδρὶ νόμον ἐξεῖναι θεῖναι,
ἐὰν μὴ τὸν αὐτὸν ἐπὶ πᾶσιν ̓Αθη-
ναίοις, ἐὰν μὴ ἑξακισχιλίοις δόξῃ
κρύβδην ψηφιζομένοις, and simi-
larly in Dem. Or. 24 (Timo-
crates) $ 59.

13. ὁ μὲν νόμος...ὁ δὲ πατὴρ
κ.τ.λ.] The sentence is rather
loosely written, and the sense
might have been brought out
better by some such arrange-
ment as this: ὁ μὲν νόμος... κε-
λεύει, ὁ δὲ πατὴρ Φορμίωνι οὔπω
Αθηναίῳ γενομένῳ ἔδωκε τὴν
ἑαυτοῦ γυναῖκα· ἐτελεύτησε γὰρ
κ.τ.λ. A similar looseness of
structure may be noticed in §§
25 and 15ἐπὶ Δυσνικήτου Β.C.
370. ἐπὶ Νικοφήμου B.C. 360.

τῆς δωρεάς.] sc. τῆς πολιτείας. Or. 36 § 30.

ἐβούλετο, ἢ ἀποθανόντα διαθήκας καταλιπεῖν, ὃς οὐ κύριος ἦν; ἀλλὰ μὴν αὐτῶν τῶν νόμων ἀκούσαν 14 τες, γνώσεσθε ὡς οὐ κύριος ἦν διαθέσθαι. λέγε τὸν νόμον.

ΝΟΜΟΣ.

[Ὅσοι μὴ ἐπεποίηντο, ὥστε μήτε ἀπειπεῖν μήτ' ἐπιδικάσασθαι, ὅτε Σόλων εἰσῄει τὴν ἀρχὴν, τὰ ἑαυ τοῦ διαθέσθαι εἶναι, ὅπως ἂν ἐθέλῃ, ἂν μὴ παῖδες ὦσι γνήσιοι ἄρρενες, ἂν μὴ μανιῶν ἢ γήρως ἢ φαρμάκων ἢ νόσου ἕνεκεν, ἢ γυναικὶ πειθόμενος, ὑπὸ τούτων

14. ὅσοι μὴ ἐπεποίηντο κ.τ.λ.] • whosoever had not been adopted, when Solon became Archon, and thereby remained unable either to renounce or to claim his inheritance, shall be allowed to dispose of his own property at his pleasure, provided he have no male issue lawfully begotten.' Cf. Isaeus Or. 6 (Philoctemon) § 28 τοῖς φύσει υἱέσιν αὑτοῦ οὐδεὶς οὐδενὶ ἐν διαθήκη γράφει δόσιν οὐδεμίαν, διότι ὁ νόμος αὐτὸς ἀποδίδωσι τῷ υἱεῖ τὰ τοῦ πατρὸς καὶ οὐδὲ διαθέσθαι ἐξ ὅτῳ ἂν ὦσι παῖδες γνήσιοι.

The law is quoted to prove that Pasion had no right to make a will, (1) because he had male issue lawfully begotten (sc. Apollodorus). But it will be noticed that the law does not forbid such persons from making any will whatever, but simply enacts that those who have no male issue may dispose of their property as they please. Pasion was not debarred by this law from making a will, but was not allowed to make any disposition he chose, since (as in our law of entail) the right to the property was secured to the son.

Again (2), Pasion was a citizen

by 'adoption,' whereas this law implies that no 'adopted' person could dispose of his property as he pleased. But it will be observed on the other side, that the plaintiff has deliberately confounded two different senses οἱ ποιεῖσθαι (1) ' to adopt into a family' and (2) to present with the citizenship. ἐπεποίηντο refers to 'family adoption' and the plaintiff argues as though it meant the same as ἐπεποίητο πολίτης.

ἀπειπεῖν ἐπιδικάσασθαι.] Οr. 52 (Callippus) § 19 οὔτε ἀμφισ βητήσαντα οὔτε ἀπειπόντα περὶ τοῦ ἀργυρίου. ἀπειπεῖν may be paralleled by the phrase in Roman law eiurare hereditatem.

μανιών ] genitive, like the subsequent substantives, governed by eveкa at the end of the clause. 6 Unless his mind is impaired by lunacy, or dotage, or by drugs or disease.' K.

[The plural μανίαι means, as usual, 'mad fits,' 'delusions.' P.]

ὑπὸ τούτων του παρανοῶν.] Α certain correction of the old reading ὑπὸ τούτων τοῦ παρανό μων. Cf. Isaeus Or. 9 ad fin. εἰ τοῦτον ἐποιήσατο υἱὸν οὗ τῷ πατρὶ πολεμιώτατος ἦν, πῶς οὐ

του παρανοῶν, ἢ ὑπ' ἀνάγκης, ἢ ὑπὸ δεσμοῦ καταληφθείς.]

15 Τοῦ μὲν νόμου τοίνυν ἀκηκόατε, ὃς οὐκ ἐᾷ διαθήκας διαθέσθαι, ἐὰν παῖδες ὦσι γνήσιοι. οὗτοι δέ φασι ταῦτα διαθέσθαι τὸν πατέρα, ὡς δὲ παρεγένοντο οὐκ ἔχουσιν ὑποδεῖξαι. ἄξιον δὲ καὶ τόδε ἐνθυμηθῆ ναι, ὅτι ὅσοι μὴ ἐπεποίηντο, ἀλλ ̓ ἦσαν πεφυκότες γνήσιοι, τούτοις ὁ νόμος δίδωσιν, ἐὰν ἄπαιδες ὦσι, διαθέσθαι τὰ ἑαυτῶν. ὁ τοίνυν πατὴρ ἡμῶν ἐπεποίητο ὑπὸ τοῦ δήμου πολίτης, ὥστε οὐδὲ κατὰ τοῦτο ἐξῆν αὐτῷ διαθέσθαι διαθήκην, ἄλλως τε καὶ περὶ τῆς γυναικὸς, ἧς οὐδὲ κύριος ἐκ τῶν νόμων ἦν, παῖδές τε 16 ἦσαν αὐτῷ. σκέψασθε δὲ καὶ διότι οὐδ ̓ ἂν ἄπαις τις ᾖ, κύριός ἐστι τὰ αὑτοῦ διαθέσθαι, ἐὰν μὴ εὖ φρονῇ· νοσοῦντα δὲ ἡ φαρμακῶντα ἢ γυναικὶ πειθόμενον ἢ

ὑπὸ τούτων τοῦ παρα

o Z et Dind. cum P. Wesseling. νόμων libri. ἢ ὑπὸ τῶν του παρανόμων Bekker cum Reiskio. ὑποδεῖξαι Dind. cum Σ (prima manu).

· ἐπιδεῖξαι Ζ.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

εὖ φρονῇ.] Isaeus Or. 7 8 1 εἴ τις αὐτὸς ζῶν καὶ εὖ φρονών ἐποιήσατο, contrasted with et τις τελευτήσειν μέλλων διέθετο, εἴ τι πάθοι, τὴν οὐσίαν ἑτέρῳ. Εur. Ion 520, εὖ φρονεῖς μέν ; i.e. ἆρα ἔμφρων εἶ; Οι νοσούντα see above, § 14 νόσου ἕνεκεν.

φαρμακώντα.] Harpocr. Δημοσθένης ἐν τῷ κατὰ Στεφάνου. ἔστι δὲ φαρμακῶν ὁ ὑπὸ φαρμακῶν βεβλαμμένος, ὡς καὶ Θεόφραστος ἐν ιέ Νόμων ὑποσημαίνει.

[φαρμακᾶν is one of a class of verbs implying mental or bodily affection, e. g. λημᾶν, ‘to have blear eyes, ποδαγρᾶν, χαλαζάν, φονάν, to be blood-thirsty, θανατᾶν, ‘to have a desire for death,' Plat. Phaedo p. 64 B, τομάν ‘to require the knife &c. The verbs themselves are less commonly used than their participles. P.]

« PreviousContinue »