Page images
PDF
EPUB

mentioned by Caesar. Probably, then, as the reader will see if he looks at the map, they were dependants or a subdivision of the Senones (C. G., pp. 471–3).

Treveri.-Caesar says that the territory of the Treveri, whose name is recognizable in Trèves, extended to the Rhine (iii, 11, § 1; vi, 9, 5); that it was conterminous with the territory of the Remi (v, 24, § 2); and that it was separated from the Eburones by the Segni and Condrusi (vi, 32, § 1). It cannot be defined exactly, because we do not know whether the Treveri or the Mediomatrici, who were their southern neighbours, possessed the territory which afterwards belonged to the Vangiones, and because we cannot trace the frontiers of the Eburones, Segni, and Condrusi, with which no dioceses correspond. The northern boundary of the Treveri may have been the rugged valley of the Ahr or perhaps the river Vinxtbach, between the Ahr and the Moselle; and their territory comprised the greater part of the province of Luxembourg, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, and the southern part of Rhenish Prussia (C. G., p. 481).

Trinovantes.-This tribe inhabited Essex, for their chief town, Camulodunum (Ptolemy, Geogr., ii, 3, § 11), was on the site of Colchester.

[An article on Portus Itius by F. H.' appeared in the Classical Review of December, 1913, and I replied to it in the following March.]

APPENDIX

It would be well worth while to visit the Musée des Antiquités Nationales (especially Salle XIII) at St. Germainen-Laye, which may be reached from Paris (St. Lazare) in 40 minutes.

Any one who wishes to study the scene of Caesar's earlier operations in Britain may test the notes which I have written on 9, §§ 1, 3-4 by walking from Sandwich to Canterbury and from Walmer to Barham, following the course of the Little Stour from Barham to Bekesbourne, and thoroughly exploring the line of the Great Stour between Fordwich and Thanington. All this could be done in four or five days. Sheets 289 and 290 of the One Inch Ordnance Survey would be useful. As to Atuatuca, see page 71.

INDEX OF PROPER NAMES

Africus, 8, 2.
Ambiorix, 24, 4; 26, 1; 27, 1. 11;
29, 5; 31, 6; 34, 3; 36-8; 41, 2. 4.
Ancalites, 21, 1.
Arduenna (silva), 3, 4.
Aremoricae civitates, 53, 6.
Ariovistus, 29, 3; 55, 2.
Arpineius, 27, 1; 28, 1.
Atrebas, 22, 3.
Atrebates, 46, 3.
Atrius, 9, 1; 10, 2.

Atuatŭci, 27, 2; 38, 1.2; 39, 3; 56, 1.
Aurunculeius Cotta, 24, 5; 26, 2;
28-31; 33, 2; 35-7; 52, 4.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

54,

4;

56, 5.

Pompeius (interpreter), 36, 1.

Rēmi, 3, 4; 24, 2; 53, 1;
Rhenus, 3, 1.4; 24, 4; 27, 8; 29, 3;
41, 3; 55, 1. 2.

Romani, 32, 1; 34, 1. 3; 38, 2; 56, 1.
Romanus, 3, 3; 22, 4; 27, 1. 4; 28,
1; 29, 4; 41, 5. 7; 51, 3; 54, 4. 5.
Roscius, 24, 2. 7; 53, 6.

Sabinus. See Titurius.

[blocks in formation]

Taměsis, 11, 8; 18, 1.
Tasgetius, 25, 1. 4; 29, 2.
Taximagŭlus, 22, 1.

Tenctĕri, 55, 2.

Titurius Sabīnus, 24, 5; 26, 2; 27,
1. 7; 29-31; 33, 1; 36, 1; 37, 1;
39, 1; 41, 2. 4; 47, 4; 52, 4; 53, 4.
Transrhenani, 2, 4.

Trebonius, 17, 2; 24, 3.

Trevěri, 2-4; 24, 2; 47, 4. 5; 53, 2;
55, 1; 58, 1.
Trevěrus, 26, 2.
Trinovantes, 20-22.

Vertico, 45, 2; 49, 2.
Vorēnus, 44, 1. 3. 5. 9. 11.

INDEX OF NOTES

[Only those notes are included which readers might perhaps wish to
consult and not be able to find easily without help.]

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »