THE MAIDEN CASTLE. A Study in Folklore. SPREAD, my Pegasus, thy pinions, That, as far as man may know, His said Majesty, however, Boasted either more or less: But alas! the regulation For the rescue of her charmer Princely lover should there be, Turning into melodrama This portended tragedy. Yet none came. 'Twas not surprising: One can see the awkwardness Of a monarch advertising In the columns of the Press. Then the king (what king surrenders Came the architects with tracings, In the tower his hapless daughter Yet is fate too strong for mortals, Nor could aught forfend the worst, For a lover had the maiden, Then 'neath darkness' kind protection Kissed each other through the glass. Sadly did the princess linger, Till an inspiration came, As with diamond-circled finger On the pane she scratched his name: Then, her love the strength supplying, Stopping nor to sleep nor eat, Wrought she, till the glass was lying On the carpet at her feet. Came her lover with his ladder, And for flight her soul was nerved; But alas! her fate was sadder Than such constancy deserved: For she thought she heard a creaking, In the tower, repining deeply, Of its circle may one see, R. H. F. ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON. (Read at a meeting of the Critics, October 20th, 1894.) AW E'are continually told, and volume after volume, as it comes from the publishers, attired in the greenest and goldenest of bindings, reminds us that our age has banished Genius, and chooses to set up in her place the images of Cleverness and Superficiality. It is the complaint of all the arts, but more especially has the sacred domain of letters suffered from the intrusion of these new deities. Instead of the great poets who even during their lifetime have won immortality, we have dozens of ephemeral versifiers, turning out their little books day after day, gaily-dressed weaklings! And for our great masters and mistresses of prose style-for Thackeray or George Eliot, with their deep knowledge of the human character and their perfect science of artistic treatment, we have next to nothing to show but a crowd of blatant essayists, ignorant adventurers in psychology, ready to weave their flimsy epigrams on any and every subject under Heaven. But from the press of literary folk, visible to all, there stands out one figure in stature a very Saul among that lesser herd, one who has deigned to enter into their midst and touch their tools, who has not stood outside the press, like certain faultless stylists, but has brought into it a full measure of that old divinity which the gods of an earlier age possessed. He has handled the implements of the literary craftsman, and in his hand they have willingly lost their bluntness, and adapted themselves readily to any material. Robert Louis Stevenson is a Michelangelo of letters, capable of the most minute and delicate goldsmith's work, a bold-handed, great-brained statuary, a consummate adept with pencil and brush. It is only now and then that we find talent of this sort springing up and bearing fruit on whatever ground it is sown, finding moisture in the hardest and stoniest soil as well as in rich and fertile earth. The ordinary man, as a rule, finds his own province and cultivates it, infringing nowhere beyond his proper boundaries, and seldom setting his foot outside his own kingdom. But here we have one to whom every province is the same, whose kingdom is the whole world, to whose call nature and man, in wholesome federation, yield ready obedience. No man has ever been at home among so many men and in so many different kinds of places as Mr Stevenson. For it is in his wonderful versatility that his chief charm resides. Wherever he sets foot he is at home. He is novelist, essayist, traveller, poet, playwright all in one. He can invest the most unpromising material with magic the most prosaic subject clothes itself amply in romance at obedience to his command. And his versatility extends beyond his choice of subject into his treatment. No two books were ever less alike than Prince Otto and the New Arabian Nights: and certainly the most far-sighted expert could not be expected to discover unaided their author in Virginibus Puerisque or, to go further still into the unlikely, in the Child's Garden of Verses. There is a common link of style, but even that is again and again of the thinnest but beyond that, what? This strange ability, we might almost say, of taking an interest in anything, has provided for us a remarkably various repast. At his invitation we may batten on American prairies, or seek a meal on the barren rocks of Earraid, or stay to eat at Will o' the Mill's hostelry, |