3. Testator devised to A. for life, and after her death to B. for life, and at the decease of A. and B., or the sur- vivor, gave all his real estate to C. if he should live to attain 21; but in case he should die before that age, and D. should survive him, in that case to D., if he should live to attain 21, but not otherwise; but in case both C. and D. should die before either of them should attain 21, then to E. in fee. Held that C. took a vested remainder. Bromfield v. Crow- der, T. 45 Geo. 3.
4. The devisor, after using these intro- ductory words, as touching such worldly and personal estates where- with it has pleased God to bless me, I give and dispose of the same in the following manner," gave an estate for life to his wife in all his freehold, leasehold, and copyhold, and, after her death, gave "all his lands, houses, &c. in manner following;"
to A., one of his grandsons, he gave "all his lands, freehold, copyhold, and leasehold in E.," and proceeded "also I devise all my estate, freehold and copyhold, in H." to him; to B, another grandson, he gave all his estate, lands, &c. called or known, &c., with 500l.; and to C., his re- maining grandson and his heir at law "the house I now live in, with all the lands, &c. belonging to the same, and also my houses and lands com- monly called or known, &c., and also 500l." Held that A. took only an estate for life in remainder in the devisor's estate in E. Doe d. Wright y, Child, T. 45 Geo. 3.
5. Devise of real and personal estate to trustecs, their heirs, executors, and administrators, in trust to lay out the personalty in land, and during the lives of the testator's sons A. B., and C., and of his grandson D., the son of A., and of such other sons as A. then had or might have, and of such issue as D. might have, and of such issue as any other sons of A. might have, and of such sons as B., C., and D. might have, and of such issue as such sons might have, as should be living at the time of the testator's decease, or born in due time afterwards, and during the lives and life of the sur- vivors or survivor, to receive the rents and profits of the real estate de- vised and to be purchased, and lay out the same, from time to time, as they should arise, in land; and after the death of the survivor of such persons, to divide the whole into three lots, and to convey one to the eldest male lineal descendant of each of his three sons in tail male, with remain- ders to the second and third, aud every elder male lineal descendant, with cross remainders in tail male; remainder to the trustees in fee, upon trust to sell and pay the produce to the king, to be applied to the use of the sinking fuud, as should be directed by parliament. This is a good de- vise at law, and equity will enforce the trusts. Thellusson v. Woodford, T. 45 Geo. 3. Page 357
DISCONTINUANCE,
See RIGHT, Writ of, DISTRESS.
335 See ASSESSMENT 1.
I. A copyholder demised his copyhold to J. S. to hold for one year, and at the end thereof from year to year, for 13 years more, in all 14 years, if the lord would grant licence, but so as not to create a forfeiture; and co- venanted that the lessee should quietly enjoy during the term aforesaid; and the lease contained many covenants and provisoes applicable only to lease for several years. After the expiration of the first year the copy- hold was purchased by the lord, and surrendered to a trustee for him, who immediately gave a regular notice to quit to J. S., no licence to let having been obtained. Held that, upon the expiration of the notice, the trustee might maintain an actiion of eject- ment, though the contents of the lease were known to the lord before he completed his purchase, and though the covenant of the vendor against incumbrances contained an exception of the subsisting leases un- der which the tenants then held. Luff kin v. Nunn, H. 45. Geo. 3.
1, 2. PLEADING RELEASE 2. VARIANCE 1.
2. Service of a declaration in ejectment, See DETInue by nailing it on the barn-door of the premises, in which barn the tenant had occasionally slept, there being no dwelling-house, and the 'tenant not be- ing to be found at his last place of abode, was allowed to be good service. Fenn v. Roe, T. 45 Geo. 3.
3. The Court held service of the decla- ration in ejectment on the wife of the
1. Upon an indictment for disposing of and putting away a forged bank note knowing it to be forged, the prose- cutor may give evidence of other forged notes having been uttered by the prisoner, in order to prove his knowledge of the forgery. Rex v. Wylie, T. 44. Geo. 3.
2. In an action on the statute for usury in discounting a bill, it was proved that one B. demanded payment of the acceptor, and commenced an ac- tion against him, and afterwards re- Iceived the amount of the bill and
be afterwards legally executed, the warranty cannot by proved by pa- rol. Hodges v. Drakeford, E. 45 Geo. 3. Page 270
EXECUTORS AND ADMINI, STRATORS.
the costs of those proceedings on pro- See COVENANT 2. ducing the bill, and gave a receipt as attorney of the present Defendant; this without further evidence of B. being the agent of the Defendant, and without the production of the proceedings against the acceptor, was held good prima facie evidence to be left to a jury of the Defendant having received the usurious interest. See PRACTICE 6. Owen v. Barrow, M. 45 Geo. 3.
3. Action for these words spoken by Defendant of the Plaintiff in his pro- fession of a physician; "Dr. S. has upset all we have done, and die he (the patient) must." It was proved that the Plaintiff had practised several years as a physician, and having been called in during the absence of a physician, who, with the Defendant, attended the patient; the Defendant, as apothecary, made up the medicines prescribed by the Plaintiff, for the patient in question, Quære, Whether, on this declaration, it was necessary for the Plaintiff to produce a diploma, or other direct evidence, that he had taken a degree in physic, in order to maintain the action, the Court being equally divided. Smith v. Taylor,
1. Debt does not lie against an admini- strator upon a simple contract of his intestate. Barry v. Robinson, T. 45 Geo. 3. 293
See EMBEZZLEMENT 1. EVIDENCE 1. FORGERY 1.
FEME COVERT. See BARON and FEME 1. FINE 1.
1, The Court will discharge a feme covert Defendant upon a common appearance, though she contracted the debt as a feme sole, and was en- trusted by the Plaintiff as such, unless she represented herself to be single, Collins v. Rowed, T. 44. Geo. 3° 2. To a plea of coverture the Plaintiff replied, that the Defendant's husband "lived and resided in parts beyond the seas, viz. in Ireland; and that the Defendant lived in this kingdom separate and apart from her husband as a single woman; and as such single
ance executed by him, and the pur- See INSURANCE 3. 6. chase-money paid, the Court of C. B.
will not prevent the wife from levying
a fine because her husband has since
become non compos, Stead v. Izard, T. 45 Geo. 3,
another, but an original contract to See BASTARd 1.
See CONDITION 1. RELEASE 2.
INCORPORATION.
See CONDITION 1.
1. Action on a policy on goods from Berderygge to London, effected by the consignees on the 13th of December without communicating a letter re- ceived by them the day before, but dated the 30th November, informing them that the captain would sail the next day, and directing them, if he should not be arrived, to effect the insurance as low as possible; held a material concealment, though the ship did not in fact set sail till the 24th of December. Willis v. Glover, E. 44 Geo. 3. Page 14 2. Action on a policy on goods "until the cargo should be discharged and safely landed;" on the arrival of the ship the goods insured were put on board a lighter, hired in the usual way, and brought to the Plaintiff's wharf in the evening, but not landed on account of the rough weather; the Plaintiff then undertook to see
the landing himself, but, n the night, the lighter, by an unavoidable acci- dent, was sunk, and the goods were lost: held that the underwriters were discharged. Strong v. Natally, E 44 Geo. 3. Page 16
3. Policy on freight valued at 500l. on a voyage at and from Demerara, Ber- bice, and the Windward and Leeward Islands to London. The ship being at Demerara, an agreement was en- tered into by the master with a house there for a freight from Berbice to London, the cargo to be put on board at Berbice, and the ship to take a cargo of bricks and planks from De- merara to Berbice, and deliver them there; while proceeding from Deme- rara to Berbice, with the bricks and planks on board, she met with an accident, and in consequence never earned her freight. Held that it was not a loss within the policy. Seller v. M'Vicar, E. 44 Geo. 3.
4. In effecting a policy on the 8th of January, at Whitehaven, on a ship "at and from Barbadoes to Liverpool," a broker's letter was produced, stating that the ship insured was not cop- pered, but a slow sailer; was expected to have sailed on the 28th November; and that the Barton, a coppered ves- sel, and very fleet, which had sailed the 24th from Barbadoes, had arrived on the 5th January, but no notice was taken of the Agreeable, another coppered and fleet vessel, which sailed the 29th November, having also ar- rived on the same day as the Barton. After verdict for the Plaintiff, the Court refused to grant a new trial on
« PreviousContinue » |