1590. The University to Lord Burghley, on behalf of the Uni-
versity press, against the claims of the London booksellers. 1
Dr. Whitaker to Lord Burghley, against a visitation of the
University, as being more likely to root out those who speak
against disorders than to remove the disorders themselves. 3
The vice-chancellor to Lord Burghley, stating various disorders
which had arisen in the University ; giving a full account
of the disputes in the case of Mr. Johnson, and of the com-
bination which had been formed to resist all graces in the
schools, meu tioning the extraordinary license of certain ser-
mons; and referring the cause of all these difficulties to
Mr. Johnson . . . . . . . . .
The University to Lord Burghley, complaining of the towns-
people, and forwarding to him a brief respecting the licensing
and ordering of victuallers in the town and precincts of Cam-
bridge, to prove that the bond for the due observance of the
orders about meat in Lent was to be entered into before the
vice-chancellor of the University, and not before the mayor. 8
The Privy-Council to the vice-chancellor, requiring him to see
that the orders for the killing and eating of flesh in Lent
be duly observed . . . . . . . . . 11
Dr. Whitaker to Lord Burghley, denying that he had for-
bidden, as had been reported of him, that an oration should
be delivered in St. John's College in praise of her Majesty's
government . . . . . . . . . . 12
The University to Lord Burghley, exonerating Dr. Whitaker
and the fellows of St. John's
Testimonial from the fellows of St. John's, declaring that there
is no presbytery in their college . . . . . . 14
Dr. Whitaker to Lord Burghley, requesting his lordship to
examine the charges which had been made against him · 15
R. Clerk and J. Powell to Lord Burghley, stating certain
disputes which had arisen in Christ's College, and com-