Page images
PDF
EPUB

+

4.75

posthumous children to the rights of nature; and CHA P. upon the failure of the agnats, they preferred the XLIV. blood of the cognats to the name of the gentiles, whose title and character were insensibly covered with oblivion. The reciprocal inheritance of mothers and sons was established in the Tertullian and Orphitian decrees by the humanity of the senate. A new and more impartial order was introduced by the novels of Justinian, who affected to revive the jurisprudence of the twelve tables. The lines of masculine and female kindred were confounded: the descending, ascending, and collateral series, was accurately defined; and each degree, according to the proximity of blood and affection, succeeded to the vacant possessions of a Roman citizen *.

The order of succession is regulated by nature, Introduc or at least by the general and permanent reason of tion and liberty of the lawgiver but this order is frequently violated testaments. by the arbitrary and partial wills which prolong the dominion of the testator beyond the grave †. In the simple state of society, this last use or abuse of the right of property is seldom indulged it was introduced at Athens by the laws of Solon; and

the

* See the law of succession in the Institutes of Caius (1. ii. tit. viii. p. 130-144.), and Justinian (1. iii. tit. i-vi. with the Greek version of Theophilus, p. 515-575. 588-600.), the Pandects (1. xxxviii. tit. vi-xvii.), the Code (1. vi. tit. lv-lx.), and the Novels (cxviii.).

+ That succession was the rule, testament the exception, is proved by Taylor (Elements of Civil Law p. 519-527.), & learned, rambling, spirited writer. In the iid and iiid books the method of the Institutes is doubtless preposterous; and the Chancellor Duquesseau (Oeuvres, tom. i. p. 275.) wishes his countryman Domat in the place of Tribonian. Yet covenants. before successions is not surely the natural order of the civil laws.

CHAP the private testaments of the father of a family are authorised by the twelve tables. Before the time of the decemvirs *, a Roman citizen exposed his wishes and motives to the assembly of the thirty curiæ or parishes, and the general law of inheritance, was suspended by an occasional act of the legislature. After the permission of the decemvirs each private lawgiver promulgated his verbal or written testament in the presence of five citizens, who represented the five classes of the Roman people a sixth witness attested their concurrence; a seventh weighed the copper money, which was paid by an imaginary purchaser; and the estate was emancipated by a fictitious sale and immediate release. This singular ceremony †, which excited the wonder of the Greeks, was still practised in the age of Severus; but the prætors had already approved a more simple testament, for which they required the seals and signatures of seven witnesses, free from all legal exception, and purposely summoned for the execution of that important act. A domestic monarch, who reigned over the lives and fortunes of his children, might distribute their respective shares according to the degrees of their merit or his affection: his arbitrary dis

* Prior examples of testaments are perhaps fabulous. At Athens a childless father only could make a will (Plutarch, in Solone, tom. i. 164. See Isæus and Jones).

+ The testament of Augustus is specified by Suetonius (in August. c. 101. in Neron. c. 4.), who may be studied as a code of Roman antiquities. Plutarch (Opuscul. tom. ii. p. 976.) is. surprised όταν δε διαθηκας γραφωσιν ἑτέρες μεν απολείπειν κληρονομές, έτεροι δε πώλεσι τας εσίας. The language of Ulpian (Fragment. tit. xx. p.627. edit. Schulting) is almost too exclusive-solum in usu est.

XLIV.

displeasure chastised an unworthy son by the loss of CHA P. his inheritance and the mortifying preference of a stranger. But the experience of unnatural parents recommended some limitations of their testamentary powers. A son, or, by the laws of Justinian, even a daughter, could no longer be disinherited by their silence: they were compelled to name the criminal, and to specify the offence; and the justice of the emperor enumerated the sole causes that could justify such a violation of the first principles of nature and society *. Unless a legitimate portion, a fourth part, had been reserved for the children, they were entitled to institute an action or complaint of inofficious testament, to suppose that their fathers understanding was impaired by sickness or age; and respectfully to appeal from his rigorous sentence to the deliberate wisdom of the magistrate. In the Roman jurisprudence, an essential distinction was admitted between the inheritance and the legacies. The heirs who succeeded to the entire unity, or to any of the twelve fractions of the substance of the testator, represented his civil and religious character, asserted his rights, fulfilled his obligations, and discharged the gifts of friendship or liberality which his last will had bequeathed under the name of legacies. But as the imprudence or prodigality of a dying man might exhaust the inheritance, and leave only risk and labour to his successor, he was empowered to retain the Falcidian portion; to deduct, before

the

Justinian (Novell. cxv. No. 3, 4.) enumerates only the public and private crimes, for which a son might likewise disinherit his father.

Legacies

CHAP. the payment of the legacies, a clear fourth for his XLIV. own emolument. A reasonable time was allowed

Codicils

and trusts.

to examine the proportion between the debts and the estate, to decide whether he should accept or refuse the testament; and it he used the benefit of an inventory, the demands of the creditors could not exceed the valuation of the effects. The last will of a citizen might be altered during his life or rescinded after his death: the persons whom he named might die before him, or reject the inheritance, or be exposed to some legal disqualification. In the contemplation of these events, he was per mitted to substitute second and third heirs, to replace each other according to the order of the testament; and the incapacity of a madman or an infant to bequeath his property, might be supplied by a similar substitution *. But the power of the testator expired with the acceptance of the testament each Roman of mature age and discretion acquired the absolute dominion of his inheritance, and the simplicity of the civil law was never clouded by the long and intricate entails which confine the happiness and freedom of unborn generations.

Conquest and the formalities of law established the use of codicils. If a Roman was surprised by death in a remote province of the empire, he addressed a short epistle to his legitimate or testamentary

*The substitutions fidei commissaires of the modern civil law is a feudal idea grafted on the Roman jurisprudence, and bears scarcely any resemblance to the ancient fidei commissa (Institutions du Droit François tom. i. p. 347-383. Denissart, Decisions de Jurisprudence, tom. iv. p. 577-604). They were stretched to the fourth degree by an abuse of the clixth Navel; a partial, perplexed, declamatory law.

mentary heir; who fulfilled with honour, or ne- c h a r. glected with impunity, this last request, which the XLIV. judges before the age of Augustus were not authorised to enforce. A codicil might be expressed in any mode, or in any language; but the subscription of five witnesses must declare that it was the genuine composition of the author. His intention, however laudable, was sometimes ille, gal; and the invention of fidei-commissa, or trusts, arose from the struggle between natural justice and positive jurisprudence. A stranger of Greece or Africa might be the friend or benefactor of a child, less Roman; but none, except a fellow-citizen, could act as his heir. The Voconian law, which abolished female succession, restrained the legacy or inheritance of a woman to the sum of one hundred thousand sesterces; and an only daughter was condemned almost as an alien in her father's house. The zeal of friendship, and parental affection, suggested a liberal artifice: a qualified citizen was named in the testament, with a prayer or injunction, that he would restore the inheritance to the person for whom it was truly intended. Various was the conduct of the trustees in this painful situation they had sworn to observe the laws of their country, but honour prompted them to violate their oath: and if they preferred their interest under the mask of patriotism, they forfeited thẹ esteem of every virtuous mind. The declaration of Augustus relieved their doubts, gave a legal VOL. VIII. sanction

G

Dion Cassius (tom. ii. 1. lvi. p. 814. with Reimar's Notes) specifies in Greek money the sum of 25,000 drachms,

« PreviousContinue »