Results 1-3 of 41
But , if they can , they can do something that no purely formal game theory can
take into account ; they can do better than a purely deductive game theory would
predict . And , if they can do better — if they can rise above the limitations of a ...
He can , however , do slightly better with a mixed commitment . He can , because
he and Column are both attracted to column I , disagreeing only over the choice
of Row in that column . If he offers Column a 50 - 50 chance between rows i and ...
12 R still has a “ dominant strategy ” of attack ; he does better by attacking , no
matter what C does . But in this case , as distinct from the case portrayed in Fig .
19 , he is worse off than if neither side had elected to attack . It is C ' s knowledge
What people are saying - Write a review
LibraryThing ReviewUser Review - HadriantheBlind - LibraryThing
This is one of the most important books on Game Theory, and also, thankfully, one of the more accessible (certainly much more so than von Neumann's and Morgenstern's book). His main theses are that ... Read full review
Bargaining Communication and Limited
Toward a Theory of Interdependent Decision
Enforcement Communication and Strategic
9 other sections not shown