Coercive Family Process, Volume 3 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 45
Page 103
... victim included : gives up toy , withdraws , does not respond , cries , and defensive posture ( e.g. , covers up head ) . If these outcomes functioned as reinforc- ers , they should have been associated with the in- creased likelihoods ...
... victim included : gives up toy , withdraws , does not respond , cries , and defensive posture ( e.g. , covers up head ) . If these outcomes functioned as reinforc- ers , they should have been associated with the in- creased likelihoods ...
Page 106
... victim . The latter in- cluded pain reactions by the victim as well as sub- mission and compliance reactions . Observers of children's play in six cultures coded five percent of their aggression as designed to hurt the victim ( Lambert ...
... victim . The latter in- cluded pain reactions by the victim as well as sub- mission and compliance reactions . Observers of children's play in six cultures coded five percent of their aggression as designed to hurt the victim ( Lambert ...
Page 141
... victim to comply or submit . In this context , the person initiating a co- ercive event is the attacker . The person who ends a coercive exchange with a positive or neutral reac- tion is the victim . Within coercion theory it is the victim ...
... victim to comply or submit . In this context , the person initiating a co- ercive event is the attacker . The person who ends a coercive exchange with a positive or neutral reac- tion is the victim . Within coercion theory it is the victim ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adults aggres analysis antece antecedent antisocial behavior antisocial child antisocial children attacks aversive events Bandura base rate base-rate values baseline behav boys caretaker changes Chapter chil cial clinical samples coercion coercive behavior coercive child behavior coercive responses consequences contingent correlation counterattack covariation crises delinquency described deviant behavior disruption dren dyad effect escalation experimental family interaction family management family members fathers findings functional relations given havior hypothesis increase interac irritable labeled learning likelihood mean measures ment mothers negative reinforcement Noncomply nursery school observation occur OSLC outcome parents Patterson peer person positive reinforcement preschool present problem child produce prosocial punishment reactions Reid reported reviewed role sequence sessions showed siblings significant significantly sion skills Social Aggressors social interaction sponse Stealers stealing stimuli suggest TAB scores Table target child target event Tease theory tion tive treatment variables victim Whine