Page images
PDF
EPUB

The other an St. Powle's good gate,

A dreary spectacel;

Its head was placed on the high cross,

In high street most nobel.

As we should expect from a dialect writer, the poems of Burns are full of examples of this.

For a' that and a' that,

Their tinsel show and a' that,

The honest man, though e'er sae poor,

Is king o' men for a' that.

-Is there for honest Poverty.

Heard ye o' the tree o' France,

I watna what 's the name o' 't.

-Tree of Liberty.

And Shakespear, in this single sentence, shortens one word and lengthens another.

I 'gin to be a-weary of the sun.

-Macbeth, v., 5.

For every legitimate effect scores of instances in which them than that they repre

Notwithstanding cases in which these alterations are appropriate, it is easy to see that the tendency causing them may be carried too far. produced by them, there are nothing better can be said of sent slovenly workmanship. This is true sometimes of forms so familiar to us that the altered words seem scarcely to be altered at all; as, for instance, in cases of apheresis or front-cut, like I'll, he 's, 't is, 'neath, 'tween; of syncope or mid-cut, like o'er, e'en, e'er; and of apocope or end-cut, like o', wi', and i'. Whatever may be thought of these cases, however, there is no doubt about the effects of less familiar changes. Notice the following:

But peaceful was the night

Wherein the Prince of Light

His reign of peace upon the earth began ;
The winds with wonder whist
Smoothly the waters kist,

Whispering new joys to the mild ocean.

-Hymn on the Nativity: Milton.

I joyless view thy rays adorn

The faintly marked distant hill.

-Lament: Burns.

And at his side by that same tide
Came bar and beam also.

-Winstanley: Jean Ingelow.

And so sepulchred in such pomp dost lie,

That kings for such a tomb would wish to die.

-On Shakespear: Millon.

Shall my foolish heart be pined

'Cause I see a woman kind;

Or a well disposed nature

Joined with a lovely feature?

-The Manly Heart: G. Wither.

A shield that gives delight

Even to the enemies' sight,

Then when they're sure to lose the combat by 't.

-To Mr. Hobbes: Cowley.

Slowly he gat and 'twixt the tree-boles gray

He 'gan to go.

-The Man Who Never Laughed Again: Wm. Morris.

I stand 'mazed in the moonlight.

-The Unbeloved: Massey.

Yet are 'ware of a sight, yet are 'ware of a sound.

-A Rhapsody of Life's Progress: Mrs. Browning.

O perfect love that 'dureth long.

—Afternoon at a Parsonage : Jean Ingelow.

And 'plaineth of love's disloyalties.

-Divided: Jean Ingelow.

The fact that some of these latter words were once

used in English without prefixes, does not excuse these

elisions. Most readers feel that this had nothing to do with their appearance in the particular places where we find them, and that they were used here solely because their writers did not exercise the skill needed in order to construct their lines so as to contain words like amazed, aware, endureth, and complaineth.

If nothing else can show us the inappropriateness of these changes in serious poetry, the way in which they are used for comic effects should do it; for example:

Stick close to your desks, and never go to sea,
And you all may be rulers of the queen's navee.

-Pinafore: Gilbert.

I du believe in prayer an' praise
To him that hez the grantin'
O' jobs; in every thin' thet pays;
But most of all in cantin';
This doth my cup with marcies fill,

That lays all thought o' sin to rest ;
I don't believe in princerple,

But, O! I du in interest.

-Bigelow Papers: Lowell

CHAPTER XIV.

SACRIFICE OF SENSE TO SOUND CONTINUED.

Omission of Words or Ellipsis indicating Crudeness-Leading to Obscurity because Meanings are conveyed by Phrases as well as by WordsMisuse of Words, Enallage-Poetic Sounds are Artistic in the Degree in which they really represent Thought and Feeling.

THE

HE alteration of words leads to results far less serious than the omission of them, which is the fault that we have next to consider; for while the former makes the style less natural, and, so far as art is to be judged by the standards of nature, less artistic, the latter makes it less useful, at times, indeed, well-nigh unintelligible. Omission or ellipsis is an exaggeration of terseness in style, which is often a great excellence. In all kinds of writing, but especially in that appealing to the imagination, it is a fault to express too much. Those to whom poetry is naturally addressed derive their main satisfaction and therefore interest, from that which influences them in the way of suggestion, leaving their fancies free to range where and as they will. Notice in the following how much the ellipses—and there are many of them-add to the vivaciousness of the effect, and at the same time how little they detract from its clearness.

Coriolanus.-Hear'st thou, Mars?

Aufidius.-Name not the god, thou boy of tears-
Coriolanus.-Ha!

Aufidius.-No more

Coriolanus.-Measureless liar, thou hast made my heart
Too great for what contains it. Boy!-O slave

Pardon me lords, 't is the first time that ever

I was forced to scold. Your judgments, my grave lords,
Must give this cur the lie

[ocr errors]

Cut me to pieces, Volsces; men and lads,

Stain all your edges on me!-Boy! False houna,

If you have writ your annals true, 't is there

That like an eagle in a dove-cote, I

Fluttered your Volscians in Corioli:
Alone I did it-Boy!

-Coriolanus ., 6: Shakespear.

Beside its embers, red and clear,
Basked, in his plaid, a mountaineer;
And up he sprung with sword in hand,-
"Thy name and purpose! Saxon, stand!
“A stranger.”—“What dost thou require ?”
"Rest and a guide, and food and fire.
My life's beset, my path is lost,

The gale has chilled my limbs with frost."
"Art thou a friend to Roderic?"—"No."-
"Thou darest not call thyself a foe?”

"I dare! to him and all the band
He brings to aid his murderous hand."-
"Bold words!-but, though the beast of game
The privilege of chase may claim,
Though space and law the stag we lend,
Ere hound we slip, or bow we bend,

Who ever recked, where, how, or when,
The prowling fox was trapped or slain ?
Thus, treacherous scouts-yet sure they lie,
Who say thou comest a secret spy!"

-Lady of the Lake, 4: Scott.

In using ellipses, however, there is always danger, as is suggested here in the last line but one, that the poet, in trying not to express his thoughts too fully, will fail to express them adequately, especially when he is beset by the additional temptation of omitting certain of his words

« PreviousContinue »