Up hither, from among the trees appear'd, Presence Divine. Rejoicing, but with awe, In adoration at his feet I fell, Submiss: He rear'd me, and, Whom thou sought'st I am, Above, or round about thee, or beneath. -Paradise Lost, 8: Milton. Now let us go back and take up examples in which, in descriptions of persons, too much attention, relatively, is paid to the thought as contrasted with the form. The following is a passage of this kind. Through a series of explanations, it appeals directly to the understanding, scarcely at all to the imagination. I admire Him and his fortunes, who hath wrought thy safety; Bent upon peril in the range of death. -Douglas, 2: Home. Here is another passage of the same sort : Turn up thine eyes to Cato! There mayest thou see to what a godlike height -Cato, 1, 4: Addison. Contrast with this the following description of Ogier the Dane in William Morris' Earthly Paradise. The representation here is just as direct as in the foregoing, but, in a sense not true of it, each sentence presents a picture. Great things he suffered, great delights he had, Before his heart her love could well receive. -Ogier the Dane. Of course some will think that these lines are not far removed from the level of prose. But they could not well be made more poetic without using illustrative representation, the introduction of which into passages of this kind is much the best way of making them appeal to the imagination. To recognize this fact one has only to compare the following descriptions of natural scenery with those given a few moments ago. The first deviates only slightly from the methods of direct representation. In front The sea lay laughing at a distance; near, The solid mountains shone, bright as the clouds, And in the meadows and the lower grounds -The Prelude, 4: Wordsworth. In the second the figures stand out more clearly: At my feet Rested a silent sea of hoary mist. A hundred hills their dusky backs upheaved To dwindle, and give up his majesty, Usurped upon far as the sight could reach. -Prelude, 14: Wordsworth. Now look at the effects of illustrative representation upon descriptions of persons, as in this: O what a noble mind is here o'erthrown! The courtier's, scholar's, soldier's eye, tongue, sword: The glass of fashion, and the mould of form, The observed of all observers. And in this: -Hamlet, iii., I: Shakespear. He was not born to shame : Upon his brow shame is ashamed to sit; For 't is a throne where honor may be crowned Sole monarch of the universal earth. -Romeo and Juliet, iii., 2: Idem. And in these series of pictures presented to the imagi. nation in Sir Richard Vernon's description of Prince Harry and his troops: All furnished, all in arms; All plumed like estridges that wing the wind; As if an angel dropped down from the clouds, And witch the world with noble horsemanship. -1 Henry IV., iv., 1: Shakespear. Notice, too, to what an extent the element of beauty is introduced into the following, through the use of illus trative representation : For up the porch there grew an Eastern rose That, flowering high, the last night's gale had caught, A single stream of all her soft brown hair Ah, happy shade !—and still went wavering down, Milton says that poetry must be simple, sensuous, and passionate. The above certainly meets all these requirements. Read this too from Shakespear's Antony and Cleopatra: I will tell you. The barge she sat in, like a burnished throne, Burned on the water: the poop was beaten gold; Purple the sails, and so perfumed, that The winds were love-sick with them; the oars were silver; Which to the tune of flutes kept stroke, and made The water, which they beat, to follow faster, As amorous of their strokes. For her own person, Her gentlewomen, like the Nereids, So many mermaids, tended her i' th' eyes, -Antony and Cleopatra, ii., 2: Shakespear. Perhaps no poetical passage could exemplify better than this that which distinguishes the sensuous from the sensual. Describing conditions which some of our modern poets would think would justify them in throwing every shred of drapery overboard, it reveals nothing that the most delicate taste cannot enjoy. The picture appeals solely to the imagination, and to nothing lower, which proves that Shakespear, although a poet, had enough practical sense to know that verse which does not appeal to the highest æsthetic nature cannot be in the highest sense artistic. |