Page images
PDF
EPUB

REPORT

OF THE

sion to the Profession is merely a Money Test,' as to the payment of certain Fees and Stamp Duties, the only mode of ascertaining the acquirements of the intended Apprentice being limited to

INCORPORATED SOCIETY OF THE ATTORNEYS his making a most vague and unsatisfactory Affi

AND SOLICITORS OF IRELAND.

(Concluded from page 7.)

davit that he has been at certain schools, and was instructed in the usual manner' in such and such books, but without affording any evidence or proof as to the advantages he has derived therefrom.

"At the General Meeting of this Society, held "In furtherance of the wishes of the Society, as after last Easter Term, the subject of certain pro- expressed in the Resolution which was passed at posals made by solicitors in England to members of the General Meeting, held in the month of May the Profession in Ireland to become agents in car- last, your Council had a communication with the rying on suits in this country upon receiving agency Moral Examiners of the Three Law Courts on the charges and a participation of the profits, was again subject, whose opinions appear in favor of an im brought under the notice of the Society, when, after proved system both of qualification and examinaconsiderable discussion, it appeared to be the ge- tion; and in pursuance of a further Resolution, neral feeling of the Meeting that steps should be adopted at the General Meeting of the Society, again taken by this Society to put a check to what held in the month of June last, your Council, on appeared to be not only objectionable in practice the first day of last Michaelmas Term, presented and injurious to the interests of the Profession in a Memorial to the Lord Chancellor, the Judges, this country, but likewise involved a serious in- and the Benchers, seeking to have the recommenfringement of statute law; and under such impres-dations contained in the Parliamentary Report of sion, a Resolution to the following effect was entered into, which your Council was requested to have published with their Report, and which Resolution they trust will meet the approval and cooperation of their brethren, and be acted upon by the Profession, as a body, in both countries:

25th August, 1846, on the subject of Legal Education, carried fully into effect, and they have since received an intimation from the Under Treasurer of the King's Inns, that the Memorial in question has been referred to the Education Committee of the Benchers of that body for their consideration and report.

'Resolved-That having every desire to co-operate with our professional brethren in England in any proposal that "Some cases of great hardship have been subshould be considered conducive to the elevation of the cha-mitted to the Council of your Society for adjudiracter of our Profession in each country, but being adverse to any arrangement which would tend to destroy that independence of character so absolutely necessary to the honorable discharge of the duty which we undertake on being admitted Members of the Profession in Ireland (even if we did not consider ourselves bound by law so to act), we express our unqualified opposition to any such proposals being acquiesced in, and pledge ourselves, as a body, not to enter into any such arrangements, directly or indirectly; and that for the purposes of carrying out the above object, the Society pledges itself to bring before the notice of the Profession generally every case of the kind which is brought to their knowledge, and that the Council do take all legal

means to put a stop to the practice.'

And your Council are enabled to state, that our brethren in England, upon due consideration of the subject, have very generally acquiesced in the view thus taken by this Society.

cation, by Members of both branches of the Legal Profession, with respect to the subject of retaining Counsel, and in one instance where a very eminent Member of the Bar had accepted a Brief for a Defendant, and after having made himself acquainted with its contents, discovered that he had been previously retained by the plaintiff, who, notwithstanding what had occurred, insisted on his acting for him. The Counsel in question proposed to be guided by the opinion of the Council of this So ciety, and on being informed that it was the opinion of your Council that (assuming that he had read the Defendant's Brief, and was therefore acquainted with his case) he should not hold a Brief for the Plaintiff, the gentleman in question, having previously taken a Retainer for the Plaintiff, conceived he could not properly act for the Defendeither party. Other cases of a similar kind have come to the knowledge of your Council, which would render it a matter of very great importance to both branches of the Legal Profession to endeavour, if possible, to have some clearly-defined rule established on the point, as cases of very great hardship both to Solicitors and their Clients (and in some instances to the Members of the Bar) do frequently occur, and which might possibly be guarded against if the attention of the Bar were specially directed to the subject.

"Your Council have carefully considered various communications made to the Society in rela-ant, and therefore declined being concerned for tion to proposed improvements in the Education and Examination of persons intending to become Apprentices, which they deem to be a most important subject, and one which has long called for reform to remedy the present system, which has been truly pronounced by the Parliamentary Report of the Select Committee of the House of Commons on the subject of Legal Education, to be most defective and insufficient.

"It may, therefore, be asserted as a general fact, that the Apprentice is left almost solely to his own individual exertions, industry, and opportunities, and that no suitable Legal Education, worthy of the name, is at this moment afforded him, and that the present test of fitness for admis

"With respect to your Society's Funds, your Council have endeavoured to keep the Expenditure within the limits of the Receipts, but a claim has been made with respect to some outstanding ac

counts for repairs and works done to the Solicitors' Buildings, which your Council consider should of right be discharged out of the Funds of the King's Inns (to which all the Members of our Profession have so long and so largely contributed), and for that purpose they would suggest that a Special Application should be made to the Benchers on the subject, representing that this Society has no Funds at its disposal applicable to such purpose, and respectfully suggesting that steps should be taken by the King's Inns to have the Solicitors' Building placed in the same position, with respect to its maintenance and repair, as is the case with regard to all the other Buildings in connection with the Courts, and which are placed under the Board of Works, and maintained at the public expense, and are under the constant superintendence of the Architect of that Board, whose duty it is to have all such matters properly attended to at all times as occasion may require.

of his client's estate, being retained by a lender to prepare a security for money to be advanced to the client on such estate, is bound to inform such lender of the existence of his own lien.

REMUNERATION OF SOLICITORS. SUGGESTIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE INCORPO

RATED LAW SOCIETY.

(From the Appendix to the Annual Report.) THE mode in which solicitors are now paid gives them an interest in opposing improvement, and in continuing antiquated forms and technical modes of proceeding; in fact, to use the words of the late Lord Langdale, it makes it "almost compulsory upon the solicitor, in his own defence, to put his client to very great and unnecessary expense, for services in respect of which he cannot otherwise the purpose of obtaining some remuneration for make a lawful demand." Such a system, so far as it is allowed to influence the Profession, tends to separate the interest of the client from that of the solicitor in every stage of his employment. On the one hand, the interest of the client is to have his business completed as quickly and with as few technical forms as possible; on the other, the inter

"Your Council regret having occasion to reiterate the complaints which have so frequently been made by their predecessors in Office, of this Society not being supported by the Profession to the extent which might reasonably be calculated on, when the advantages which it affords are to be obtained on such moderate terms, and its utility is so fully ad-est of the solicitor is to create delay and to multimitted by the Members of the Profession, many of whom, although they have never joined the Society, have nevertheless sought to have their grievances redressed through its agency, and in some instances have even gone the length of appying for aid from its Funds for that purpose."

LAW OF COSTS.

An interesting case on this subject was last week reported from the H. of L. In Gray v. Graham, (26 L. T. Rep. 111,) the following points, which every practitioner should note, were determined. They are so clearly stated by Mr. Paterson, that we give them verbatim:—

1. Where a solicitor has a lien upon his client's deeds for costs incurred by him, and the client upon application refuses to pay those costs, and the solicitor is driven to bring an action for them, the lien extends as well to the costs of enforcing the bill of costs as to the costs incurred by the client himself. 2. Though a solicitor who has a lien for his costs on his client's deeds, has in an action for the untaxed bill of costs obtained judgment, and thereafter acquired the rights of a real creditor, yet in a question between the solicitor and other real creditors having otherwise a prior security on the same estate, the latter are not precluded even after the lapse of a considerable time from insisting upon taxation of the bill of costs.

3. Where a solicitor has a lien in respect of his costs over all the title-deeds of his client, the client having several estates, the solicitor, in parting with the title-deeds of one of those estates, does not lose his lien in the proportion which the value of such estate bears to the value of the whole estates, but he preserves the lien entire upon the remaining

estates.

4. A solicitor, having a lien upon the title-deeds

ply and lengthen forms, in order that by these
would be remunerated inadequately, if at all.
means he may be paid for services which otherwise

It is now nearly fifteen years since the solicitors
commenced their efforts to alter a system of remu-
neration which they feel to be so objectionable.
In December 1840, at the desire of Lord Langdale
(then Master of the Rolls and their official chief),
they drew up some suggestions for improving the
system of remuneration. The principal of these
suggestions was the constitution of a taxing board
invested with a most extensive and summary juris-
diction, and with discretion to apportion remunera-
tion according to the nature and importance of the
business transacted, to the skill and labour be-
stowed upon it, and to the responsibility incurred
by the solicitor. These views met the entire ap-
probation of Lord Langdale, and, it is understood,
of Lord Lyndhurst, the then Lord Chancellor;
and with the concurrence and assistance of the so-
licitors the six clerks' office was abolished, the of-
fice of taxing master was instituted, and the charges
of solicitors, for conveyancing business, were made
liable to taxation, by which it was designed that
the improved discretionary system intended to be
introduced should be made uniform and applicable
to every kind of legal business, and that all the
professional acts of solicitors should be under the
summary control of the judges. The communica-
tions with Lord Langdale, recently printed by the
Incorporated Law Society, fully bear out the fore-
going statement, and show that, from the first, his
Lordship assured the solicitors, that "if it should
appear that any important improvement in the
practice and proceedings of the court would inju-
riously affect the fair emoluments of professional
men," they might rely on the court for giving "just
remuneration to counsel and solicitors for services
truly rendered by them to their clients."
(To be continued.)

12

FINAL NOTICE TO CLAIMANTS.

INCUMBERED ESTATES COURT.

In the Matter of the Estate of
John White,

Charles Albert Creery,
and Frederick Agee,
Trustees of the Will of
Henry Hardy,
Owners; Ex parte
Edw. Dawson Atkinson,

Petitioner.

LL Parties interest

Adare hereby required to

TAKE NOTICE, that the Com. missioners have Sold Part of the Lands of Dromart, otherwise Dru. mart, situate in the Barony of Oneiland West, and County of Ar. magh, and that the Draft Schedule of Incumbrances is now lodged in the Office of the General Clerk of this Court, and if any person have a claim not therein inserted and admitted, or any objection to said Sche. dule either on account of the amount or priority of any charge therein mentioned as due to him or any other person, or because he claims any lien on the purchase money or otherwise. Notice is hereby Given that a statement, duly verified, of the particulars of such claim, objection, or lien, must be lodged by such person with the General Clerk of this Court, on or before the 22nd day of January next; and on the following Monday, the 28th day of January, at the hour of Eleven o'Clock, Mr. Commissioner Hargreave, Q.C, will give directions for the final settlement of said Sche. dule. And all persons interested are hereby further required to take Notice, that within the time aforesaid any person may file an objection to any demand contained in said Schedule. Dated this 14th day of December. 1855.

ROBERT K. PIERS,

Notice Clerk.
EDW. DAWSON ATKINSON, Solicitor, 15, College-green, Dublin

THOM'S IRISH ALMANAC & OFFICIAL

DIRECTORY of the UNITED KINGDOM, for 1856, is now ready, price 7s. 6d., or bound with the Dublin Post Office Directory, 13s. 6d. The Dublin Post Office Directory may be had separately, price 78.

Dublin: ALEXANDER THOM & SONS, Printers and Pubilshers, 87 & 88 Abbey.street. Orders received by all Booksellers.

ΜΟ

ODERN LAW BOOKS to be sold Cheap at WILLIAM AMER'S, Law Bookseller, Lincoln's London :

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]

Inn Gate,

£ s. d.
0 12 0

0 10 0
220
212 0
140

090
086

14 0

0 12 0
0 16 0

120
130

PROWSERS-The numerous testimonials re

gance, ease, and peculiar style of their Trowsers, and likewise the very flattering patronage bestowed on them by the higher classes of society, induce them to apprize their patrons, and those gentlemen who have not hitherto honored them with their orders, that they have secured the ser. vices of a few of the most experienced workmen for the winter season, J. O'D's. practical knowledge as a Trowsers Cutter having been fully tested in the first houses of the British metropolis, he is therefore fully qualified to produce an article in this department of Tailoring, that can. not be excelled in London or Paris.

JOHN O'DRISCOLL & CO., Professed Trowsers Makers, 10 ANGLESEA-STREET.

[blocks in formation]

Assisted by efficient Masters.

The above Institute claims the particular attention of Parents and Guardians, as combining a most careful training in the preparatory Eng. lish, Classical and Scientific courses, with an efficient study of the French and German Languages, such as to advance the pupils, at an early age, to fluency of composition and conversation, these languages being grada. ally used as a principal medium of conveying instruction to the Pupils. The Day School Department is open for the reception of Pupils at one moderate charge for the whole Educational Course, inclusive of French, German, Drawing, Drilling and Gymnastics.

The usual reduction in case of two or more brothers, also in favour of pupils from Dublin and along the line of rail.

For further particulars, terms, references, &c., a printed prospectus can be had on application, in person or by letter, to

HERR E. T. MANSO,

TIVOLI HALL, KINGSTOWN.
Business will be resumed (D.V.) on Monday, the 14th of January.
NEW LAW BOOKS.

Price 5s., by Post, 5s, 6d.

THE JUSTICES' MANUAL :-containing—

RISDICTION ACT, 1851; THE PETTY SESSIONS ACT, 1851; and
THE LAW OF EVIDENCE AMENDMENT ACT; with NOTES,
COMMENTS, and COPIOUS INDEX.

By EDWARD P. LEVINGE, Esq., Barrister-at-Law.

THE PRACTICE OF THE CIVIL BILL by statute 15

57, with an Appendix of the several Statutes relating to the Law between 0 10 6 Landlord and Tenant, and to the Law of Evidence, with a Commentary, 090 comprising the Decisions upon the re-enacted Sections of the previous Acts of the Civil Bill Code, and the Analogous Sections of the County Courts Acts, (England) with a Copious Index. By JOHN BLACKHAM, Eaq, Barrister-at-Law. 6s. 6d.

NORTH BRITISH INSURANCE COM

PANY.

ESTABLISHED IN 1809,

Incorporated by Royal Charter and Special Act of Parliament,
CAPITAL-ONE MILLION.

Head. Office-61 PRINCE'S-STREET, EDINBURGH,
Dublin-8 COLLEGE GREEN,

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

NEW ORDERS IN CHANCERY.

Just published, price 3s., by Post, 38. 6d.

THE GENERAL ORDERS OF THE COURT OF

CHANCERY, dated the 31st of July. 1851, under the Chancery Regulation Act, 1850, as amended, and the MASTERS GENERAL ORDERS under the Act, with Comments and Observations, and showing the Practice as now established in CAUSE PETITIONS; with an Analytical Index. By WILLIAM SMITH, Esq., Barrister-at-Law. Dublin: EDWARD J. MILLIKEN, Law Bookseller and Publishe 15, College-green,

[blocks in formation]

Orders for the IRISH JURIST left with E. J. MILLİKEN, 15, COL LEGE GREEN, or by letter (post-paid), will ensure its punctual delivery in Dublin, or its being forwarded to the Country, by Post, on the day of publication.

All communications for the IRISH JURIST are to be left, addressed to the Editor, with the Publisher, E. J. MILLIKEN, 15, COLLEGE GREEN. Correspondents will please give the Name and Address, as the columns of the paper cannot be occupied with answers to Anonymous Communications-nor will the Editor be accountable for the return of Manuscripts, &c.

TERMS OF SUBSCRIPTION→ → (payable in advance):
Single Number, 2s. 6d.

Yearly, £2.

Published by EDWARD JOHNSTON MILLIKEN, 15 College green and Printed by WHITE, BROTHERS, 45 Fleet-street.-Jan. 1, 1856.

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

85

87

[blocks in formation]

........

98

COURT OF EXCHEQUER—Continued):

NERWICH V. GREGORY. Practice Consent for
judgment-Costs-Nolle prosequi-3 & 4 Vic. c.
105, s. 58.........
PROSSER V. CUDDY. Practice-Change of venue
-Common Law Procedure Act............
CALDWELL V. BOARD OF WORKS. Motion for
leave to institute an action against the Secretary
to the Commissioners of Public Works in Ireland
—1 & 2 W. 4, c. 33, s. 91—16 & 17 Vic. c. 113,
sec. 15.........

103

105

106

GRAY V. HANDCOCK. Practice-Defences framed
to embarrass-Bill of exchange-Common Law
Procedure Amendment (Ireland) Act, sec. 83.... 108
FARIS V. ROSS. Practice-Defence framed to em-
barrass-Bill of exchange-Common Law Proce-
dure Amendment (Ireland) Act, ss. 70, 83......... 109
CONSOLIDATED CHAMBER:

MILLER . O'BRIEN AND PIGOTT. Practice-Sub-
stitution of service-Sufficiency of affidavit of
service of process-16 & 17 Vic. c. 113, s. 34.... 109
M'CLOREY V. Reid (Cle.) anD M'MINN. Prac-
tice-Application to set aside defence as double,
ambiguous, and framed to embarrass-16 & 17
Vic. c. 113, 85. 61, 68, 71, 83-45th and 179th
General Orders, (1854)........

[ocr errors]

111

The Act having been passed, the solicitors, on questing that general orders should be prepared to give effect to the scheme which had been proposed, and received the following answer:—

14th Oct. 1843.

WE direct the particular attention of the attorneys the 12th Oct. 1843, wrote to his Lordship, reto the case of Reg. v. Turner, (26 L. T. Rep. 150), in which it was held by the Court of Ex. that an attorney's bill, delivered under the statute, must state whether the business done was in a court of equity or in a court of law, and if in both, that it must show in which court the business charged for was done, "as it must be considered," says the judgment, "that an attorney's bill is addressed to a person presumably ignorant of the law, and ought to convey reasonable information, in order that he may know exactly in what court the business was done, because the rules of taxation are different.-Law Times, Dec. 1855.

REMUNERATION OF SOLICITORS. SUGGESTIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE INCORPORATED LAW SOCIETY.

(From the Appendix to the Annual Report.) After the establishment of the board of Taxing Masters, Lord Langdale addressed to them a letter (dated 10th Nov. 1842), requesting them to report to him on the system of costs, "with a view, if practicable, of reducing bills of costs to a true statement of services actually performed, and of charges constituting a fair and just remuneration for the services so stated." In this letter his Lordship points out forcibly, "that the system gives to the solicitor, and every other legal practitioner, a direct interest to increase the length of documents, and the number of steps or proceedings in the transaction of business;" and "has in many cases made it almost compulsory upon the solicitor in his own defence, to put his client to very great and unnecessary expense, for the purpose of obtaining some remuneration for services in respect of which he cannot otherwise make a lawful demand." A copy of this letter Lord Langdale transmitted to the Incorporated Law Society, but they are not aware that any report was ever made by the taxing masters in accordance with his Lordship's directions.

In full reliance on the intention of the judges to carry out the principle of remuneration indicated in Lord Langdale's letter, the solicitors assisted in preparing the Act for Consolidating the Law of Attorneys, which subjected conveyancing charges to taxation, and in getting the Bill passed through Parliament in the next year, 1843.

Previously to this Act the charges for conveyancing business, though partly regulated by professional usage, were not liable to taxation. The rule of quantum meruit was the only legal test; and in case of dispute, it was decided by a jury. The transfer of the power of the jury to the taxing masters, and placing the business under the summary control of the judges, was the price which the solicitors agreed to pay for introducing the principle of "quantum meruit” into the rules for the taxation of costs. The price was paid by the solicitors, but that which they were to have received in return has been withheld.

Sir, I have received your letter, dated the 12th instant, and I will take the earliest opportunity of communicating with the taxing masters upon the important subject to which it relates; and having first communicated with them, I will submit such observations as may seem proper to the Lord Chancellor. (Signed) LANGDALE.

"To the Chairman of the Incorporated Law Society."

Concurrently with the circumstances already referred to, the equity committee of the Incorporated Law Society were occupied through the years 1841, '42 and 43, in preparing suggestions for Lord Langdale and the judges, and in assisting to draw up the numerous general orders and Acts of Parliament then made for the improvement of the court. Among other matters which necessarily came under consideration was the mode of dealing with the masters' offices: and though the committee came to no conjoint action on that subject, yet one of the members drew up and published (in 1841), and distributed among all the judges and leading members of the Profession a plan for abolishing the offices and transferring the business into the judges' chambers, and for establishing & chamber jurisdiction. This scheme (together with the almost insuperable obstacles presented to any permanent improvement by the present system of remuneration) was strongly pressed by the solicitors on the attention of the Committee of the House of Lords, which sat on the Masters in Equity Jurisdiction Bill in 1851. Lord Brougham, at the close of the inquiry, tendered his own evidence to the committee, and thus stated the conclusion at which he had arrived :—After referring to the divided responsibility which the system of masters created, as one great cause of delay and expense in the court, he expressed himself as follows:-"My opinion is clear (with the whole of the evidence) that the other cause is the perfectly faulty mode of remunerating professional men, solicitors especially; but I do not except counsel. This opinion is the result of my whole professional experience and observation, and it is not confined to proceedings in equity. The subject is one of great difficulty, but is one of yet greater import. ance; and I feel assured that, whatever other changes are effected to improve our system, whether of equity or common law, a large proportion of the evils will remain, unless this difficulty shall be grappled with and overcome.

Previously to the Chancery Commission being issued by the Crown, a committtee consisting of thirty solicitors had been selected by the council of the Incorporated Law Society, from their intimate acquaintance with the practice of the court, and was deliberating on the improvements which ought to be made. A copy of the committee's report was transmitted to the Commissioners, and

« PreviousContinue »