Page images
PDF
EPUB

his agility was great, and his speed extraordinary, but we cannot estimate it justly, as no horse of his day could be compared to him. The only contemporary which was sup posed at all equal to him was Mr Shaftoe's famous horse Goldfinder. He was never beaten, and was to have been matched against Eclipse for the King's plate on the following year, but he broke down at Newmarket in the October meeting.

passed the winning-post for the first time, sufficiently indi. cated to all observers of judgment what would be the result. At the Craven post, (one mile and a quarter from home,) Recruit took the lead by about half a length, and ran at such a pace, that the Arabian was unable to make a struggle at the run in, being beaten easily by several lengths. Timethree minutes and fifty-seven seconds. Recruit only landed in India in May 1828, and, it is supposed, his constitution was not, at the time of the race, sufficiently adapted to the "Eclipse won eleven King's plates, in ten of which he climate. The race, in the opinion of some, is decisive in carried twelve stone, and in the other ten. It was calcufavour of the speed of the English thorough-bred horse overlated, that within the course of twenty-three years, three all others." hundred and forty-four winners, the progeny of this animal, produced to their owners the enormous sum of L. 158,071, 128. sterling, exclusive of various prizes. The prevailing excellence of all this horse's progeny was great speed, and they took up their feet in the gallop with wonderful actialmost all of them were horses of fine temper, seldom or vity; they were not generally famed for stoutness, but never betraying restiveness.

We shall next quote Captain Brown's account of one of the finest horses which this country has produced :

THE RACER ECLIPSE.

"1764. Eclipse was allowed to be the fleetest horse that ever ran in England since the time of Childers. After winning King's plates and other prizes to a great amount, he was kept as a stallion, and gained to his owner, for forty mares, the great sum of thirty guineas each.

"Eclipse was got by Marsk, a grandson, through Squirt, of Bartlet's Childers, out of Spiletta, by Regulus, son of the Godolphin Barb, out of Mother Western, by a son of Snake, full brother to William's Squirrel; her dame by old Montague, grandson by Hautboy, out of a daughter of Brimmer, whose pedigree was not preserved. Eclipse was bred by the Duke of Cumberland, and foaled during the great eclipse of 1764, whence the name given him by the royal Duke; at the sale of whose stud he was purchased, a colt, for seventy-five guineas, by Mr Wildman, the sporting sheep salesman at Smithfield, who had a good stud, and trained race-horses at Mickleham, near Epsom. This person had a friend in the service of the Duke, who gave him a hint of the superior points in the form of this horse, and he hastened to attend the sale; but, before his arrival, he had been knocked down at seventy guineas. He, however, instantly appealed to his watch, which he knew to be an exceedingly correct time-piece, and found that the appointed hour of sale had not yet arrived by a few minutes, according to advertisement. He then persisted that the sale had not been a lawful one, and that the lots knocked down should be again put up, which was accordingly done, and Eclipse was purchased by him for the sum of seventy-five guineas.

"For what reason, we have never been able to learn, this celebrated horse was never raced till he was five years of age, at which time he was entered at Epsom for the maiden plate of fifty pounds. At first trial, such were the expectations of the knowing ones, that four to one were betted in his favour. At the second and winning heat of this race, all the five horses were close together at the three-mile-post, when some of the jockeys used their whips. At this time Eclipse was going at an easy gallop, when he took alarm at the crack of the whip, bounded off at full speed, and although Oakley, his rider, was a man of powerful arm, he was not to be restrained, and, in consequence, distanced the whole of his competitors.

"In the year 1770, Eclipse ran over the course of York, for the subscription purse, against two aged horses then in high repute, Tortoise and Bellario. He took the lead, and the jockey being unable to hold him in, he was fully a distance before the other two horses at the end of the first two miles, and won the race with the greatest ease. At starting, twenty, and in running, one hundred guineas to one, were offered on him.

"Before Eclipse ran for the King's plate at Winchester, in 1769, Mr O'Kelly purchased the half share of him for six hundred and fifty guineas. He afterwards became his sole proprietor for an additional sum of one thousand guineas. It is said that some of the Bedford family asked O'Kelly, in 1779, how much he would take for Eclipse, when he replied, By the mass, my lord, it is not all Bedford Level that would purchase him!' It is said, that about this period he asked from another person the modest sum of L.25,000 down, and an annuity of L.500 a-year on his own life; and the privilege of sending to him annually six mares. Mr O'Kelly said he had cleared by this horse L.25,000, and his statement is supposed to be correct.

[ocr errors]

"The points of Eclipse to which I would particularly direct the attention of the breeder and sportsman are, the curve or setting on of his head, the shortness of his forequarter, the slant, extent, and substance of his shoulders, the length of his waist, and breadth of his loins; the extent of his quarters, and the length and substance of his thighs and fore-arms. Although he was a powerful horse, he was, nevertheless, thick in the wind; and in a sweat, or hard exercise, he was heard to blow at a considerable distance. This famous horse died on the 27th February, 1789, at Canons, aged 26 years. His heart was taken out, and it weighed 14 lbs."

One of the most remarkable matches ever run in England was the following:

MRS THORNTON'S MATCH. "1804. The lady of the late distinguished Colonel Thornton appears to have been equally attached to the sports of the field with her husband; and the extraordinary contest which took place between Mrs Thornton and Mr Flint, in 1804, not only stands recorded on the annals of the turf, as one of the most remarkable occurrences which ever took place in the sporting world, but also a lasting monument of female intrepidity. It arose out of the following cir

cumstances.

"A great intimacy subsisted between the families of Colonel Thornton and Mr Flint, arising from their being brothers-in-law, as the ladies were sisters, so that Mr Flint was a frequent visitor at Thornville Royal.

"In the course of one of their equestrian excursions in Thornville Park, Mrs Thornton and Mr Flint were conversing on the qualities of their respective horses. With the spirit and keenness which generally exists on such occasions, they differed widely in their opinions, and an oecasional spurt took place to try the mettle of their steeds; when Old Vingarillo, under the skilful management of his fair rider, distanced his adversary at every attempt; which so nettled Mr Flint, that he challenged the fair equestrian to ride against him on a future day. This challenge was immediately accepted by Colonel Thornton, on the part of his lady; and it was fixed, by the respective parties, that the race should be run on the last day of the York August Meeting, 1804. This singular match was announced by the following notice :- A match for five hundred guineas, and one thousand guineas bye-four miles-between Colonel Thornton's Vingarillo, and Mr Flint's br. h. Thornville, by Volunteer. Mrs Thornton to ride her weight against Mr Flint.'

"On Saturday, the 25th of August, this race was decided, and the following account of it appeared in the York

Herald.

"Never did we witness such an assemblage of people as were drawn together on the above occasion,-one hundred thousand at least. Nearly ten times the number appeared on Knavesmire than did on the day when Bay Malton ran, or when Eclipse went over the course, leaving the two best horses of the day a mile and a half behind. Indeed, expectation was raised to the highest pitch, from the novelty of the match. Thousands from every part of the country thronged the ground. In order to keep the course as clear as possible, several additional people were employed, and much to the credit of the 6th Light Dragoons, a party of them were also on horseback, for the like purpose, and which unquestionably was the means of many lives being saved.

Eclipse seemed to combine all the qualities which constitute an excellent racer; his stoutness, form, and action, were excellent; he had a vast stride, and certainly never horse threw his haunches below him with more vigour or effect; and his hind legs were so spread in his gallop, that About four o'clock, Mrs Thornton appeared on the a wheel-barrow might have been driven between them;'ground, full of spirit, her horse led by Colonel Thornton,

[ocr errors]

and followed by Mr Baker and Mr H. Bonyton; afterwards appeared Mr Flint. They started a little past four o'clock. The lady took the lead for upwards of three miles in a most capital style. Her horse, however, had much the shorter stroke of the two. When within a mile of being home, Mr Flint pushed forward, and got the lead, which he kept. Mrs Thornton used every exertion; but finding it impossible to win the race, she drew up, in a sportsmanlike style, when within about two distances.

At the commencement of the running, bets were five and six to four on the lady; in running the three first miles, seven to four and two to one in her favour. Indeed, the oldest sportsmen on the stand thought she must have won. In running the last mile, the odds were in favour of

Mr Flint.

“Never, surely, did a woman ride in better style! It was difficult to say whether her horsemanship, her dress, or her beauty, were most admired-the tout ensemble was unique. Mrs Thornton's dress was a leopard-coloured body, with blue sleeves, the vest buff, and blue cap. Mr Flint

rode in white. The race was run in nine minutes and fifty-nine seconds.

"Thus ended the most interesting race ever run upon Knavesmire. No words can express the disappointment felt at the defeat of Mrs Thornton. The spirit she displayed, and the good humour with which she bore her loss, greatly diminished the joy of many of the winners. From the very superior style in which she performed her exercising gallop of four miles on Wednesday, betting was greatly in her favour; for the accident which happened, in consequence of her saddlegirths having slackened, and the saddle turning round, was not attended with the slightest accident to her person, nor did it in the least damp her courage; while her horsemanship, and her close seated riding, astonished the beholders, and inspired a general confidence in her success.

"Not less than two hundred thousand pounds were pending upon Mrs Thornton's match; perhaps more, if we include the bets in every part of the country; and there was no part, we believe, in which there were not some. "It is but justice to observe, that if the lady had been better mounted, she could not possibly have failed of success. Indeed, she laboured under every possible disadvantage; notwithstanding which, and the ungallant conduct of Mr Flint, she flew along the course with an astonishing swiftness, conscious of her own superior skill, and would ultimately have outstripped her adversary, but for the accident which took place.'"

To these passages we subjoin three miscellaneous anecdotes :

EXTRAORDINARY PRESENCE OF MIND." "On the 21st November, 1793, a young gentleman, an inhabitant of Lancashire, riding in the afternoon, on the road between Ravenglass and Whitehaven, on a very highspirited blood horse, not far distant from Egremont, passed by a single-horse chaise, which occasioned the animal to be very unruly; thinking to pacify him by passing the chaise, he cantered forwards; but the horse, no longer to be restrained, bolted off at a full gallop, and, coming upon Egremont bridge the middle of the battlements of which preseats nearly a right angle to the entrance upon it-was going at such fury, that, unable to retrieve himself, he leaped scelong upon the battlements, which are upwards of four fet high. The rider, finding it impossible to recover the horse, and seeing the improbability of saving either of their lives, had he floundered over head-foremost, just as the horse was falling headlong down, had instantaneous presence of mind to strike him on both sides with his spurs, and force him to take a clear leap. Owing to this precaution he alighted on his feet, and the rider firmly keeping his seat. held up the horse, till, reaching the bottom, he leaped off. When we consider the height of the bridge, which has been accurately ascertained to be upwards of twenty feet and a half of perpendicular height from the top of the battlements, and that there was not one foot depth of water in the bed of the river where they alighted, it is really miraculous that they were not both struck dead on the spot.

"The gentleman travelled with his accustomed vigour from Egremout to Whitehaven, a distance of five miles. The only injury he received, was a slight sprain in one foot, which confined him three days at the King's Arms Inn, at Whitehaven. He remained there three days longer, waiting the recovery of his horse, who had a slight wound on the stile joint. Both, however, were perfectly well after

that time. The horse's foot had struck one of the parapet stones of the bridge with such violence, as to throw it four inches out of its situation."

SIR WILLIAM WYNDHAM AND THE WHITE HORSE.

been out one day at a stag-hunt. In returning from the "Sir William Wyndham, when a very young man, had standing round a fortune-teller, who pretended, at least, to sport, he found several of the servants at his father's gate, the bottom of a trencher with a bit of chalk, answers to be deaf and dumb; and, for a small gratification, wrote on such questions as the men and maids put to him by the

same method.

horse!'

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

he was inclined to tell his fortune as well as the rest, and, "As Sir William rode by, the conjurer made signs that in good humour, he would have complied, but not readily and writing upon it, gave it back, with these words very finding a question to ask, the conjurer took the trencher, legible, Beware of a white horse.' Sir William smiled at the absurdity of the man, and thought no more of it for several years. But in 1690, being on his travels in Italy, and accidentally, as he was passing through St Mark's Place, at Venice, in his calash, he observed a more than ordinary crowd at one corner of it. He desired his driver to stop, and they found it was occasioned by a mountebank, who also pretended to tell fortunes, conveying his several predictions to the people, by means of a long narrow tube of tin, which he lengthened or curtailed at pleasure, as occasion required. Among others, Sir William Wyndham held up a piece of money, upon which the soothsayer immediately directed the tube to his carriage, and said to him, very distinctly, in Italian, Signor Inglese, cavetell blanco cavello;' which is, Mr Englishman, beware of a white Sir William immediately recollected what had been before told him, and concluded, that the British fortune-teller had made his way to the Continent. However, upon enquiry, he was assured that the present fellow had never been out of Italy, nor did he understand any language but his mother tongue. Sir William was surprised, and But in a short time this also went out of his head, like mentioned so whimsical a circumstance to several people, the former prediction of the same kind. Our readers will remember the share which Sir William Wyndham took in the reign of Queen Anne; in which a design to restore the the transactions of government, during the last four years of his father had so justly forfeited, was undoubtedly conson of James the Second to the throne of England, which certed, and, on the arrival of King George, punished, by forcing into banishment or putting into prison all the persons suspected to have entered into the combination. Among these was Sir William, who, in the year 1715, was committed prisoner to the Tower of London. the inner gate were the arms of Great Britain, in which there was some alteration to be made, in consequence of the succession of the House of Brunswick; and just as Sir William's chariot was passing through to carry him to prison, the painter was at work, adding the White Horse, the arms of the Elector of Hanover.

Over

"This circumstance struck Sir William forcibly; he immediately recollected the two singular predictions, and mentioned them to the Lieutenant of the Tower, then in the chariot with him, and to almost every one who came to see him in his confinement; and though not superstitious, he always spoke of it as a prophecy fully accomplished. But here he was mistaken, (if there were any thing prophetic in it;) for, many years after being out hunting, he had the misfortune of being thrown from his saddle, in leaping a ditch, by which accident he broke his neck. He rode upon a white horse.”

OLD HABITS.

"Between the years 1750 and 1760, a Scottish lawyer of eminence made a journey to London. At that period such journeys were usually performed on horseback, and the traveller might either ride post, or, if willing to travel economically, he bought a horse, and sold him at the end of his journey. The gentleman above alluded to, who was a good judge of horses, as well as an excellent horseman, bad chosen the latter mode of travelling, and had sold the horse on which he rode from Scotland as soon as he arrived in London. With a view to his return, he went to Smithfield to purchase a horse. About dusk, a handsome horse was offered to him at so cheap a rate, that he was led to suspect the animal was unsound, but as he could discover no blemish, he became the purchaser. Next morning he set out on his journey; his horse had excellent paces, and the few first miles, while the road was well frequented, our traveller

any

spent in congratulating himself on his good fortune, in having made so good a bargain. On Finchley Common, and at a place where the road ran down a slight ascent and up another, the traveller met a clergyman driving a one-horse chaise. There was nobody within sight, and the horse, by his manœuvre, plainly intimated what had been the profession of his former owner. Instead of passing the chaise, he laid his counter close up to it, and stopt it, having no doubt but his rider would embrace so fair an opportunity of exercising his vocation. The clergyman, never doubting the identity of the equestrian, produced his purse, unasked, and assured the astonished lawyer, that it was quite unnecessary to draw his pistol, as he did not intend to offer resistance. The traveller rallied his horse, and, with many apologies to the gentleman he had so innocently and unwillingly affrighted, pursued his journey. The horse next made the same suspicious approach to a coach, from the windows of which a blunderbuss was levelled, with denunciations of death and destruction to the rider, though sackless, as he used to express it, of all offence in word or deed. In short, after his life had been once or twice endangered by the suspicions to which the conduct of his horse gave rise, and his liberty as often threatened by peace officers, who were disposed to apprehend him as a notorious highwayman who had formerly ridden the horse, he found himself obliged to part with the inauspicious animal for a mere trifle, and to purchase, at a dear rate, a horse less showy, and of inferior action, but of better moral habits."

We must not omit to mention, in conclusion, that the steel engravings, illustrative of the subject-matter of the volume, are spiritedly executed, and enhance the value of the work.

this is the manner in which it reviewed Goethe. Any thing in the common course of events it judges shrewdly and well; but novelties and innovations in literature startle and confound it. Ten years hence, it will have formed an opinion of Niebuhr's book, and will try to cram down our throats that it has held that opinion from the first.

The article on the "Rise, Progress, and Decline of Commerce in Holland," is, if there be any faith in titles, from the pen of M'Culloch. Other men would content themselves with saying, "History of Commerce in Holland," but he must use a circumlocution, descriptive of what constitutes history. The subject of this paper is one regarding which too little is known in this country. Mr M'Culloch has narrated the leading facts in a manner interesting and attractive to all classes of readers, and, at the same time, indicative of patient and clear-headed

research.

"Women as they Are," a new novel by Mrs Gore, to which considerable space is allotted, is an elegant, although somewhat verbose, piece of persiflage. The critic thanks his stars, in the outset, that he has met with "a respectable specimen of that class of works called novels of fashionable life." From his detailed criticism, however, of Mrs Gore's work, we are somewhat at a loss to guess why he has elevated it in preference to any one of its numerous compeers. The truth is, the writer is a man at once gallant and conscientious. He could not bring himself to say any thing unpolite to a lady, but as little could he bring himself to say any thing that was not strictly true. The preliminary flourish is merely the usual soothing of a child before you administer physic; the criticism which follows after is the real expression of what the writer thinks.

ment?

The Edinburgh Review. No. CII. London: Longman
and Co. Edinburgh: Adam Black. 1830.
THERE is much valuable matter in this Number.
Of the twelve papers which it contains, six-viz. the
papers on Sadler's Law of Population, Monk's Life of
Bentley, the Life and Services of Sir Stamford Raffles,
Sotheby's Specimens of a new Version of Homer, Law
Reform, and Jefferson's Memoirs and Correspondence—ness.
will be found at once interesting and instructive. The
short puff of the Farmer's Series of the Library of Useful
Knowledge is undeserving of notice. The remaining
articles we propose to examine a little more in detail, both
because of the talents displayed in them, and because of
some little peculiarities, which show that the Edinburgh
Review is still in tone and temper essentially the same
as it was from the beginning.

But why single out Mrs Gore for this treat

her best work. Miss Austin comes next, and unless we have sorely misunderstood him, purely because she has drawn none but commonplace characters, and that always in a commonplace style. After these comes Mrs Opie-then the Misses Burneys, senior and junior

The critic wanted to spin a yarn about female novelists, and her work was the first new one that came to hand. His little theory is drawn out with all his usual sparkling elegance, but with less than his usual happiHe starts with the assertion, that women write novels better than men; and mentions Miss Edgeworth, Mrs Opie, Miss Austin, Madame D'Arblay, and Mrs Gore. He prudently leaves unnamed the male monsters who might be opposed to this fair bevy; for Fielding, Smollett, and Scott, might have given a rude shock to his preliminary assumption. In reviewing the peculiar excellencies of the fair authors, he places Miss Edgeworth first, but protests against the opinion that her chief The History of Rome, by Niebuhr, is reviewed by a merit lies in the delineation of Irish character, allowwriter of superior cleverness and great experience in com-ing, at the same time, that Castle Rackrent is by far position, but is characterised by a want of liberality and solid information. He criticises Niebuhr's History in the same manner that the Edinburgh Review has criticised every truly original work since the era of its commencement. He does not know what to think of it. He has mind enough to acknowledge, in its powerful language and daringly original views, the presence of a mighty spirit; but he has not mind enough to comprehend it. He begins, therefore, with involuntary expres-sonal character, by those who cannot read their works, sions of vague respect; then runs chatteringly through the index of the book, dipping occasionally into the text, picking out here and there a sentence, which, taken apart from the context, looks absurd enough, and sneering at it; and concludes with renewed professions of admiration. Were we to read only the beginning and end of this criticism, we should believe its author an admirer of Niebuhr; were we to read only the middle part, we should think he despised him; and had we not already been ac- The article on the Origin and Affinities of Language quainted with the work, we should have obtained no is full of information on a subject which has for some knowledge of its nature or character from perusing the en-time back been entirely neglected in this country. The tire article. The time has been when such shilly-shallying would have enraged us. In the calmer temper, however, which age has brought along with it, we are able to see that the Edinburgh acts in this manner because its intellect is not of a standard to take a more decided course.

This is the fashion in which it treated the Lake poets

then Mrs Hannah More-then Miss Hawkins (!!!)— and then, after a list, some of whom are already forgotten, and others are praised, on account of their amiable per

he names the authoress of “ Marriage" and "The Inheritance." Such an arrangement is quite in keeping with the shallow canon which he laid down in the cɔmmencement of his article. "Gratiano talks an infinite deal of nothing-more than any man in Venice." We regret to add, that we have reason to believe this precious article to be the composition of the ex-Editor; but it is certainly one of his worst.

author (Dr Browne) has of late been dedicating almost the exclusive attention of his vigorous and indefatigable mind to it. We have had from his pen (besides the present article) a learned dissertation on Hieroglyphics, which we know excited a considerable sensation in Paris; another article on the same subject in the Foreign Quarterly Review,

and one on Egyptian Notation, in the last number of the Westminster. We have announced also, that he is preparing a large elementary work on the graphic system and literature of the ancient Egyptians. In the paper at present under our consideration, the reader will find a great quantity of information respecting the present state of philology on the Continent; a just and unsparing, but not captious, summary of the achievements of our laborious triflers of late years; together with some ingenious views of the writer regarding language.

You

be discharged when convenient. I suppose Madame had not found a favourable opportunity of accomplishing her wish in this respect, when the Revolution broke out. will think it singular, General, that for so small an affair I should now intrude upon your engagements; but my situation is so unfortunate, that this little sum is an object. Expatriated, exiled from my country, forced to seek refuge in this island, where my abode is odious to me, and so expensive, that it will prove a relief if you can let me have the sum, small as it is, and which would formerly have been a matter of indifference. This you may believe, General, The last article is political, and is preluded by a rather when you think of one at the age of eighty, who, after sixty years spent in the service of his country, has been obliged startling assertion on the part of the Edinburgh Review:to flee, subsisting on the slender provision granted by go"We rarely and unwillingly devote our pages to the dis- vernment to French emigrants;-I say emigrants, for I cussion of party matters, and what are usually termed the was obliged to become one; I had not the least idea of such politics of the day." This paper is expressed in a strain a step, but I had, it seems, committed a great crime- I was of fervid eloquence, in a style which varies as the subject the oldest general of the canton, and a Grand Cross of St requires, from the most elevated to the most homely dicLouis. My house at Caen was attacked by a band of ruffians, and I had just time to escape by a back door, with tion. It contains an expose of the present state of par- nothing save what was on my person. In this state I came ties in the country, which places the author's views (be to Paris. I was told there remained no other resource than they true or false) almost palpably before us. It throws to leave the country; yet I never had dispute or discussion down the gauntlet of defiance to the present ministry. It with a human being, but lived in retirement. Thus, Gegives a rapid and vigorous sketch of the relative positions neral, my property and movables were abandoned to the of the leading parties of the House of Commons, and, mercy of what was called the nation. The nation has profited to the full, for it has left me without wherein to lay under the pretext of conjecturing their probable operamy head. I do not ask, therefore, to return, for I have notions during next Session, throws out advice how to conwhere to go; besides, I have here a brother still more aged duct them. Devoted to the nobler and calmer pursuits of than myself, who, though in bad health, and in second inliterature, we pay little attention to politics, except when fancy, was banished also, and whom I would not leave for their storm rages so loud that no man can close his ears any consideration. I am resigned to my unhappy lot; my against it. We have not scrutinized very narrowly the only and great grief is, that not only have I myself been ill characteristics of our leading statesmen; but if we may treated, but, contrary to law, this has influenced the situahazard an opinion in a field of intellectual exertion so tion of relations whom I love and respect. I have a stepforeign to us, we think that there is but one man in Eng-claim upon my property, which indeed I enjoyed only in mother eighty years of age, who has been refused her legal land, likely to contribute to the Edinburgh Review, whose reversion. All this, if things do not change, will cause me commanding and energetic mind is capable of projecting to die a bankrupt: that will break my heart.-I confess, a political campaign like that which is here sketched out, General, I am little acquainted with the new style, but, -and that man is Henry Brougham. We regard it as according to the old, am your humble servant, his manifesto. This explains his refusal of office under the Duke; and announces to us a recurrence of the struggles of party, which believers in a political millennium looked upon as past away for ever.

Memoirs of Napoleon Bonaparte; from the French of M. Fauvelet de Bourrienne. By John S. Memes, LL.D. &c. In three volumes. Vol. II. Being Constable's Miscellany, Vol. LVIII. 1830. (Unpublished.) We have been favoured with an early copy in sheets of the second volume of Dr Memes' translation of Bourrienne. It is no less interesting than the first; but it treats of too great a variety of important matters, to make it possible to give any general view of the contents. We prefer laying before our readers a few passages, which cannot fail to attract their attention. Our first extract contains

A FAVOURABLE ANECDOTE OF BONAPARTE.

"Among the immense number of letters received at this time, I have preserved some, and among these, one from an einigrant then resident in Jersey, General Beaumanoir. It contains details connected with the Bonapartean family, and appears to me very interesting. Jersey. 12th July, 1800. -I consider, General, that on your return I may, without impropriety, interrupt your daily occupations, to recall to you remembrance one whom I flatter myself you have not entirely forgotten, after a residence of more than eighteen years at Ajaccio. But perhaps you will feel surprised that so insignificant a matter should be the subject of the letter which I have the honour to address to you. You will recollect, General, that when your late father was obliged to go to Autun, in order to remove your brothers from the college there, and whence he went to see you at Brienne, he found himself at a loss for ready money; he asked me for twenty-five louis, (L. 16,) which I lent him with pleasure. After his return, he had not found it convenient to repay the sum, and when I left Ajaccio, your mother of fered to sell some plate in order to pay me. This I would not permit, requesting her to take her own time, and left the adknowledgment of your father with M. Souirez, to

DUROSEL BEAUMANOIR.'

"I make no remarks upon the irregularity of style or grammatical slips in this letter: when I had read it to the First Consul, Bourrienne,' said he with solemnity, that is sacred; lose not a minute. The good old man! Send ten times the sum. Write to General Durosel that I will take care of him. I will that he be immediately erased from the list of emigrants. What evils have been wrought by these ruffians of the Convention! I see plainly I never can repair all.' In speaking thus, Bonaparte betrayed an emotion rarely discernible in him. In the course of the same evening, he asked if his orders were executed: they had been expedited instantly."

Bourrienne gives a very picturesque account of the circumstances which led to his temporary separation from Bonaparte. Before this separation actually took place, several misunderstandings, pretty briskly supported on both sides, occurred. Among these, the following strikes us as peculiarly characteristic:

[ocr errors]

BOURRIENNE'S FIRST QUARREL WITH BONAPARTE, "Niue months before this time, I had offered my resig nation; for the labour had become too severe, and the confinement too unremitting, for health. my The physician had, doubtless, spoken to the same effect with the First Consul; for the latter said to me, one day, in a tone little soothing, Why, Bourrienne, Corvisart tells me you have not a year to live.' The compliment was not over kind on the part of an early friend; especially as the doctor's preI had formed diction seemed not unlikely to be fulfilled. the resolution of retiring, which was urged also by my family; but various considerations retained me in a state of uncertainty; of these, affection for the First Consul-a friend from seven years of age, and this friendship only interrupted once by Joseph's machinations-was not the least. An unforeseen occurren e terminated my indecision. On the 27th of February, 1802, at ten in the evening, Bonaparte dictated to me a diplomatic dispatch of great importance, and very urgent, for M. de Talleyrand, who was, at the same time, directed to repair to the Tuileries, at an hour mentioned. According to established usage, I remitted this letter to the officer on duty, to be sent to the minister. This was on a Saturday. On the morrow, Sunday, M. de Tal

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

leyrand arrived, as if for audience, about mid-day. The First Consul having immediately addressed him on the subject of the dispatch, was extremely surprised to find the minister had received it only that morning. He rang instantly for the attendant to call me. As he was in very bad humour, he pulled the bell-rope with so much precipitation, that he struck his knuckles violently against the corner of the chimney-piece. I entered in all haste. Why,' cried he, addressing me abruptly, why was my letter not delivered last night? I know not; I gave it instantly to the person whose duty it was to cause the letters be delivered. Go, enquire about the delay, and return quickly.' Having rapidly informed myself how matters stood, I returned to the cabinet: Well?' said the First Consul, whose il temper had rather increased than otherwise. 'Well, General, no one is in fault; M. de Talleyrand was to be found neither at the office, nor at home, nor in any of the circles he usually frequents. Not knowing on whom to vent himself, restrained by the impassibility of Talleyrand, but choking with rage, Bonaparte rose, left the cabinet, and went to interrogate the officer in waiting, which he did in an abrupt manner, putting the latter quite out, who stammered, and replied incoherently; thus exciting more and more the irritation of the enquirer. Seeing the Consul thus beside himself, I had followed; and, on his returning towards the cabinet, endeavoured to pacify him, entreating him not to make so much noise about an affair, which, after all, was not of such moment. I know not if his violence arose from seeing the blood streaming from his fingers, and which he looked at every instant, taking, as the reader knows, great pride in his hands; but a most outrageous fury, such as I had never before witnessed, seized upon him; and as I was about to enter the cabinet at the same time, he flung the door from him with such violence, that most infallibly, had I been two or three inches nearer, I should have had my face broken. This almost convulsive action he accompanied by an address quite unbearable, calling out to me, in presence of M. de Talleyrand, Leave me alone! you are a — beast. At these unheard-of words, I confess the rage which filled the First Consul, on a sudden fired me also, and that, transported by a resolution quick as lightning, I opened, not less rudely than he had shut, the door, and cried, being really no longer in my senses, You are a hundred times a greater beast than I' It was during the interregnum which afterwards took This said, I shut the door, and ascended to my own apart-place, notwithstanding this reconciliation, in Bourrienne's

and finally hinted at the Tribunate That does not suit you,' said he 'they are declaimers and speechifiers, whom I will send about their business. All the disturbances in other quarters proceed from the harangues of the Tribunate: I'll have no more of them.' He went on in such a tone as left no doubt on the uneasiness caused him by this assembly, in whose ranks were to be found men of great talents and noble characters. In fact, during the same year, 1802, it was reduced to fifty members, and, somewhat later, entirely suppressed.

ments in the floor above.

"Such a separation was as far from my wishes as from my expectation; but what was done could not be undone. I seized the occasion, however, without leaving time for reflection; and, still trembling with resentment, traced, in these terms, the offer of my resignation :— General,—The state of my health permits me no longer to continue my service near your person. I beg you to accept my resignation. BOURRIENNE.'

"On the morrow, (Tuesday,) the First Consul asked me to breakfast with him. After breakfast, while he was conversing with some one, Madame Bonaparte and Hortense pressed me to make some advances; pointing out, with all the gentleness and kindly feeling they had ever shown me, that I ought to do so, seeing I had also been wrong, and had forgotten myself. I replied, that the evil seemed past remedy, and that, besides, I really required repose. At that moment, the First Consul called me; conversed a long time with me; and renewed his promises of kindness. "At five o'clock, I was about to quit the Tuileries for good, when I was informed the First Consul wished to see me. Duroc, who was in the antechamber leading into the cabinet, said, as I passed through,— My good fellow, he wants you to remain. I beseech thee not to refuse: do me this favour. I have declared to him that I cannot manage these affairs: I am not accustomed to them; and, between us, they annoy me too much.' I entered the cabinet without replying. The First Consul approached with a smile, and taking me by the ear, as in his gracious moments, said, - What still in the sulks ?' and conducted me, in this manner, to my usual place. Come, seat yourself there.' To judge of my situation, the reader must have known him. He had, when he pleased, a most winning manner. I had not the power to resist: I could not even reply; and resumed my usual tasks. A few minutes after, dinner was announced. You will dine with me to-day?' said he. I cannot; I am expected where I was going when you sent to call me: I cannot break my engagement.'-' In that case I have nothing more to say; but give me your word that you will be here at eight. I give it you." Thus, I found myself reinstated as confidential secretary of the First Consul, and believed our reconciliation sincere."

secretaryship, that the unfortunate Duke D'Enghien met his fate. The ex-secretary does not scruple to speak in the most unmitigated terms of the First Consul's conduct in reference to this affair, and expressly states, perhaps over-confidently, that he is of opinion D'Enghien's death would not have taken place had he been secretary at the time. The following is the account he gives of this disgraceful transaction :

"Some minutes after, I saw from my windows, saddlehorses brought upon the terrace. This was contrary to THE EXECUTION OF THE DUKE D'ENGHIEN. custom, Bonaparte seldom riding out on horseback on Sun- "General Ordener, commandant of the horse grenadiers day. Duroc accompanied him. I descended soon after- of the guard, received instructions from the Minister of wards to the cabinet, and laid my letter on his table. Re-War to repair to the Rhine, where the chiefs of the gen turning at four o'clock, and seeing it, he said to Duroc, d'armes of New Brissac were placed under his command. before breaking the seal,- Ah! ha! a letter from Bour- General Ordener dispatched a squadron of these to Ettenrienne;' adding almost immediately-for to read the billet heim, where, on the 15th March, they seized the Prince. required brief space- He is in a pet-Accepted! I had He was immediately conveyed to the citadel of Strasbourg, quitted the Tuileries at the moment of his return. Duroc and there detained till the arrival of orders from Paris. sent the following note, while at dinner :- The First Con- These were speedy, and as promptly executed; for the carsul, my dear Bourrienne, commands me to say, that he riage which brought the unfortunate Prince arrived at the accepts thy resignation; and requests thee to inform me barrier on the 20th, at one o'clock in the morning. There about his papers. I embrace thee.-P.S. I will call pre- the cavalcade halted for the space of five hours, and aftersently.' wards took the road to Vincennes, by the outer ramparts of Paris, reaching its destination at nightfall. Every thing in this horrible transaction passed during the night; the sun was not to enlighten even its tragic close. The escort received orders to enter Vincennes at night; at night the fatal gates closed upon the captive; during the night assembled the Council which tried, or rather which condemned, without having tried, the accused; while the clock was yet striking six, the command to fire was given, and at six o'clock, before the sun had yet risen, the Prince had ceased to live. Here I may be permitted a single reflection. Even should it be admitted, that the Council, held on the 10th March, had an influence on the arrest of the Duke, there was no Council held between his arrival at the barrier and the moment of execution; it could then have been no one save Bonaparte who gave the final orders-too punctually followed.

"About eight o'clock he came for me. The First Consul was in the cabinet when we entered. I immediately began to explain to Duroc the necessary arrangements. Piqued to find I did not speak to him, and at the coolness with which I talked to Duroc, Bonaparte said to me, in the harshest tone, Have done, you: there is quite enough of that: leave me!' I leaped from the steps, upon which I had mounted for the purpose of showing Duroc the situation of some papers, and retired instantly. I, too, had quite enough of that!

[ocr errors]

"In looking out for a convenient domicile, two days more were passed at the Tuileries. On the Monday, I descended| to the apartments of the First Consul, to offer my adieus. We conversed long and amicably together: he expressed regret that I was leaving him, and said he would do every thing for me in his power. I mentioned several places;

« PreviousContinue »