Page images
PDF
EPUB

Syriac lectionary is not older than the eleventh century. (4) The early Latin copies, like D, admitted interpolations very freely. Jerome, on the authority of some Greek MSS., retained it in the Vulgate. Ambrose and Augustine treated it as authentic. Later Latin writers naturally followed the authority of these great names.

We conclude "that the Section first came into S. John's Gospel as an insertion in a comparatively late Western text, having originally belonged to an extraneous independent source......that the Section was little adopted in texts other than Western till some unknown time between the fourth or fifth and the eighth centuries, when it was received into some influential Constantinopolitan text" (Westcott and Hort). Having found its way into most of the late Greek MSS. and into almost all the Latin texts, it was allowed by Erasmus to remain in its usual place, and hence became established in the Textus Receptus.

APPENDIX E.

Εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα and Ζωὴ αἰώνιος.

Both these expressions are of frequent occurrence in S. John's Gospel: the former of them is best rendered for ever,' and the second, eternal life.'

The

The literal meaning of els Tòv alŵva (vi. 51, 58, viii. 35, xii. 34, xiv. 16; 1 John ii. 17; 2 John 2) is 'unto the age.' The expression is of Jewish origin. The Jews were accustomed to divide time into two periods, the time preceding the coming of the Messiah, and the age of the Messiah. The latter was spoken of as 'the Age,' the age κar' Cox, the age to which the hopes of all Israel looked forward: it was 'the Age,' ó alŵv, just as the Messiah Himself was 'the Coming One,' ò èpxóμeros (vi. 14, xi. 27; Matt. xi. 3; Luke vii. 19, 20). Apostles and the Early Christian Church adopted the same language with an important change of meaning. They knew that the Messiah had come, and that 'the Age' in the Jewish sense of the term had already begun: but they once more transferred 'the Age' to the unknown and possibly remote future. 'The Age' for them meant the period which would be inaugurated by the Return of the Messiah rather than by His First Coming: it represented, therefore, the period of Christ's Second Coming, when all His enemies shall be put under His feet, and 'He shall deliver up the kingdom to God, even the Father' (1 Cor. xv. 24). Hence, eis Tòv alŵva means 'unto the age' of the Kingdom of God. Literally, therefore, the expression states no more than that there is to be duration to the end of the world; for this world ends when 'the Age' begins. But the expression seems to imply a good deal more than this. It appears to have behind it the understood belief, that whatever is allowed to see the Kingdom of God will continue to endure in that kingdom; and as

that kingdom is to have no end, so enduring els tòv alŵva includes, though it does not express, enduring, not merely until the end of this world, ἡ συντελεία τοῦ αἰῶνος [τούτου] (Matt. xiii. 40, 49, xxiv. 3, xxviii. 20), but 'for ever.'

Similarly, son alúvios means life that is suitable to 'the Age,' the life of those who share in the Kingdom of God. Like els tòv aiŵva, it does not express, but it probably implies, the notion of endlessness: and we have a word in English which does much the same, and which is therefore the best rendering to give of alúvios, viz. 'eternal.' 'Everlasting,' which in A.V. is frequently used to translate alúvios (iii. 16, 36, iv. 14, v. 24, vi. 27, 40, 47, xii. 50; Matt. xviii. 8, &c.) expresses the notion of endlessness and nothing more: it expresses, therefore, just that idea which alúvios probably implies, but does not directly state. Whereas 'eternal' is almost exactly the word we require. Eternity is the negation of time, that which to higher intelligences than ours takes the place of time, and will do so to our glorified intelligences when time has ceased to be. But when we have said that eternity is not time, we have said all that intelligibly and with certainty can be said about it. All our experience and thought involve the condition of time; and to endeavour to imagine a state of things from which time is absent is to attempt an impossibility. When we banish time from thought, we cease to think. Time, then, is the condition of life in this world; eternity is the condition of life in the world to come: and therefore swn aluvios, the life of the Age,' the life of the world to come, is best expressed in English by the words 'eternal life.' This eternal life, S. John assures us again and again (iii. 36, v. 24, vi. 47, 54, xvii. 3), can be possessed in this world, but it can only be understood in the world to come (1 John iii. 2).

It is worth remarking that S. John applies the term alúvios to nothing but 'life,' and that for this aeonian life the word is always swn and never Bios. Bios does not occur in S. John's Gospel at all, and only twice in the First Epistle;-in the phrases dλašovela Toû Biov (ii. 16), the vainglory of life,' i.e. arrogancy and ostentation exhibited in the manner of living, and ò Bios TOû Kóσμov (iii. 17), 'the world's means of life,' i.e. the goods of this world. In Aristotle and Greek philosophy generally Bios is higher than wn: Bios is the life peculiar to man as a moral being; (wn is the vital principle which he shares with brutes and vegetables. In N.T. wý is higher than Bios: Bios is, as before, the life or livelihood of man; but wý is the vital principle which he shares with God. Contrast Blos in Luke viii, 14, 43, xv. 12, 30; 1 Tim. ii. 2; 2 Tim. ii. 4, &c. with Swn in John i. 4, iii. 36, v. 24, 26, 29, 40, &c., &c. Bíos occurs less than a dozen times in the whole of the N.T., whereas (wn occurs upwards of a hundred times: wn is the very sum and substance of the Gospel. The life eternal is this, that they should know Thee the only true God, and Him whom Thou didst send, even Jesus Christ' (xvii. 3).

INDICES.

1. GENERAL.

Abraham seeing Christ's day,
meaning of, 201
Abraham's seed, supposed privi-

leges of, 70, 120, 193, 196
abstract for concrete, 176
adultery, the woman taken in,

181-186; internal evidence as
to authenticity of the passage,
181; external evidence, 362
Aenon, 108

Agony, the, implied but not nar-

rated by S. John, 257, 313
Ahithophel and Absalom, 307
Alexander the Great and the Sa-
maritans, 118

Alford on Christ's dismissal of

the adulteress, 186; on the
basis of the authenticity of the
Gospel narrative, 281
allegories in S. John, 215, 283
Alogi, rejection of the Fourth
Gospel by, xxiii

Alphaeus, or Clopas, 169, 330
Ambrose's mistaken charge a-
gainst the Arians, 102
analysis of the Gospel, brief, xl;
in detail, lxi-lxiv
anathema, Jewish forms of, 208
Andrew, character of, 84, 148,
256

angels, 88; appear once only in

S. John's narrative, 340
Annas, his office and influence,

310; examination of Jesus be-

fore him peculiar to S. John,
310

Anselm on the gift of the Spirit,
343

antithetic parallelism, 65, 71, 77
aorist and imperfect, 89, 122,
127, 241

aorist and perfect, 192, 210, 237,
285, 346

aorist imperative, 257, 327
Apocalypse, relation of the Fourth

Gospel to the, xxxiii; similar-
ities between the two, 71, 80,
82, 115, 175, 183, 255, 265,
288, 319, 335
Apocryphal Gospels, miracles of
the Child Jesus in, 92
aposiopesis, 163

Apostles' defects stated without

reserve, 92, 97, 122, 124, 236,
254, 274, 276, 280, 303, 313,
345
Apostolic Fathers, witness of, to
the Fourth Gospel, xxi, xxii
appearances of Jesus after the
Resurrection sufficiently at-
tested, 338

Arianism condemned, 136, 226
Aristophanes quoted, 290, 330
Aristotle on the invisibility of
God, 75

Arrian quoted, 127
article, force of the, 106, 140, 179,
197, 256, 259, 294

article, absence of the, 87, 162,
205, 251, 259, 292, 313, 325,
344, 350

article repeated, very frequent in
S. John, 116, 117, 193
article with Ιεροσόλυμα peculiar
to S. John, 89

assimilation a frequent cause of
corruption of the text, lvii,
lviii, 89, 113, 130, 145, 167,
183, 203

attempts to proclaim Jesus king,
150, 254

attempts to arrest Jesus, 175,
179, 249

attempts to stone Jesus, 202,
226

attraction, 191, 350
Ascension, the, implied but not
narrated by S. John, 104, 105,
163, 258, 341

asyndeton, 67, 74, 111, 224, 274,
340

augment, triple, 203

Augustine, on S. John's living in
the grave, xviii; on sacred soli-
tude, 134; on selfishness in
religion, 154; on the para-
graph respecting the adulteress,
181, 186; on ëv éoμev, 226; on
the voluntariness of Christ's
death, 332; on differences in
the Gospels, 361; quoted, 121,
124, 136, 148, 157, 166, 168,
191, 243, 328

Bacon, Lord, on Pilate's ques-
tion, 319; on the rending of
His garment, 329
Baptism, the, implied but not
narrated by S. John, xlix
Baptism, of John, 108; of Jesus,
108, 113, 114

Baptism, Christian, referred to

in the Fourth Gospel, 102, 334
Baptist, the, his connexion with
the Evangelist, xiv. 83; his
threefold testimony, 76-83;
crisis in his ministry, 76; ar-

6

gument from his being called
simply John' by the Evan-
gelist, xxxii, 67
Barabbas, 320, 321, 328
Barnabas, Epistle of, its witness
to the Fourth Gospel, xxi
Bartholomew, reasons for identi-
fying him with Nathanael, 86;
see Nathanael
barley loaves, 149
Basilides, xxii

baskets, significant distinction of,
149

Bernard on Christ's coming and
departure, 264

Bethabara, a false reading, 79
Bethany, two places of this name,
xxxii

Bethesda, an uncertain reading,
131

Bethsaida, two places of this
name, xxxii, 86, 147
blasphemy, the Lord accused of,
136, 202, 226

blind, man born, 204; his pro-
gressive faith, 207; his confes-
sion of faith, 211

brethren of the Lord, various
theories respecting, 93, 168,
331; cannot be the sons of Al-
phaeus, 94, 169

bride, figure of the Church, 109

Caesar's friend, 325

Caesar, setting oneself against,
325

Caesarea, Pilate's head-quarters,
319, 325

Caiaphas, his office, character,
and prophecy, 247, 248
Calvary, its position, 328
Cana, two places of this name,
xxxii; nature of the miracle at,
91, 93
Capernaum, the modern Tell-
Hûm, 93, 163; argument from
the mention of a brief visit to,
93
capital punishment, whether al-

lowed to the Jews by the Ro-
mans, 184, 316
Cardinal Newman, on the dis-
courses in S. John's Gospel,
100

casus pendens, 157, 178, 284, 299
centurion's servant different from
the nobleman's son, 128, 129
Cerinthus, the Fourth Gospel at-
tributed to, xxiii

change of gender, 69, 157, 299
changes of tense, 122, 127, 133,
155, 225, 241

characteristics of the Fourth Gos-
pel, xli-xlix, 66, 68-70, 81,
82, 88, 99

chief priests, mostly Sadducees,
175, 176, 246; their baseness,
327

Christology of S. John and of the
Synoptists, 139

chronology of the Fourth Gospel
consistent but often undefined,
xxx, 1, 108, 124, 131, 145, 146,
167, 223

Chrysostom, 90, 201, 357
Church, first beginning of the,

83; Christ's prayer for, 302-
304; powers granted to the,

344

Circumcision prior to the Sab-
bath, 173

cleansing of the Temple in S.

John distinct from that in the
Synoptists, 96

Clement of Alexandria quoted,
xli, 359, xxii, xxxvi
Clementine Homilies, 204, 219
Clementine Recognitions, 68
climax, 69, 354

cloths, 245, 336, 339

Clopas or Alphaeus, 330

cocks not excluded from Jerusa-
lem, 313

codices, principal, which contain
the Fourth Gospel, lv; rela-
tions between, lvi, lvii
coincidences between S. Paul and
S. John, 69, 70, 279, 359; be-
tween the Synoptists and S.

John, xlix, liii, 149, 306, 338,
359; between the Fourth Gos-
pel and Revelation, xxxiii, 71,
80, 82, 115, 175, 183, 255, 265,
288, 319, 335
Commandment, Christ's new,
271; its comprehensiveness,
285
Communion of Saints, the, scrip-
tural, 201

Conder, on Bethany, 79; on Cal-
vary, 328
connexion of thought in S. John

sometimes obscure, 141, 191
Court of the Women, 187, 189
corruption of the text, see false
readings, glosses, &c.

cross, size of the, 332; title on
the, 328

crown of thorns, 322
crurifragium, 333

cup of suffering, coincidence with
the Synoptists respecting, 310

date of the Gospel, xxxvi, 131,
238, 239
darkness, in a figurative sense,
for moral darkness, peculiar to
S. John, 66, 270

David's flight probably not al-
luded to in xviii. 1, 307
death, punishment of, whether
allowed to the Jews by the Ro-
mans, 184, 316
Dedication, Feast of, 223, 224;
its mention evidence that the
Evangelist is a Jew, xxviii
delegated authority of Christ, 81
demon, see devil

denials, S. Peter's, 311; why nar-

rated by S. John, 313; diffi-
culties respecting, 360

descent of the Spirit, its effects,
81
destruction of Jerusalem, the

Fourth Gospel written after
the, xxxvi, 131, 238, 239
devil, personal existence of the,
197;
his influence over Judas,
264, 269, 166

« PreviousContinue »