Select Cases and Other Authorities on the Law of Property, Volume 2 |
From inside the book
Page
204 B . Support and Party Walls . · · · · · 206 C . Artificial Watercourses and Drains
. . D . Ways . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 Note . Miscellaneous Easements . . 299 E .
Remedies for Disturbance of Easements . . 300 F . Maintenance and Repair of ...
204 B . Support and Party Walls . · · · · · 206 C . Artificial Watercourses and Drains
. . D . Ways . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 Note . Miscellaneous Easements . . 299 E .
Remedies for Disturbance of Easements . . 300 F . Maintenance and Repair of ...
Page 57
So that there was nothing between the plaintiff ' s consulting - room and the
defendant ' s kitchen but me party - wall . The defendant had in his kitchen two
large marble mortars set in brickwork built up to and against the party - wall which
...
So that there was nothing between the plaintiff ' s consulting - room and the
defendant ' s kitchen but me party - wall . The defendant had in his kitchen two
large marble mortars set in brickwork built up to and against the party - wall which
...
Page 58
He alleged that if the plaintiff had built his consulting - room with a separate wall ,
and not against the wall of the defendant ' s kitchen , he would not have
experienced any noise or vibration ; and he denied that the plaintiff suffered any
serious ...
He alleged that if the plaintiff had built his consulting - room with a separate wall ,
and not against the wall of the defendant ' s kitchen , he would not have
experienced any noise or vibration ; and he denied that the plaintiff suffered any
serious ...
Page 71
... on the supposition of a grant , the right to light may be gained from not erecting
a wall to obstruct it , the right to support for a new building erected near the
extremity of the owner ' s land may be explained on the same principle . In Dodd
v .
... on the supposition of a grant , the right to light may be gained from not erecting
a wall to obstruct it , the right to support for a new building erected near the
extremity of the owner ' s land may be explained on the same principle . In Dodd
v .
Page 72
334 , that the mere circumstance of juxtaposition does not render it necessary for
a person who pulls down his wall to give notice of his intention to the owner of an
adjoining wall which rests upon it , and that he is not even liable for carelessly ...
334 , that the mere circumstance of juxtaposition does not render it necessary for
a person who pulls down his wall to give notice of his intention to the owner of an
adjoining wall which rests upon it , and that he is not even liable for carelessly ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adjoining agreed alleged appears apply assigns authority banks belonging benefit bound building built called carried cause claim close common consideration considered continued conveyance conveyed course court covenant custom damages decided decision deed defendant defendant's direction easement effect enjoyed enjoyment entered entitled erected evidence exist extent fact flow give given grant ground heirs held highway injury interest judge judgment jury Justice land license Lord maintain manner means mentioned mill natural necessary neighbor nuisance obstruction occupier opinion ordinary owner particular party pass passage person plaintiff plea possession premises prescription present principle proper proprietor proved purchased question reasonable reference repair Reported respect river road rule side soil stream street sufficient surface taken tenant tenement term thereof thing tion trespass trial verdict wall watercourse whole