Page images
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

SOME ACCOUNT OF HIMSELF. BY THE IRISH OYSTER-EATER

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

WILLIAM BLACKWOOD AND SONS, 45, GEORGE STREET,

EDINBURGH:

AND T. CADell, strand, London.

To whom Communications (post paid) may be addressed.

SOLD ALSO BY ALL THE BOOKSELLERS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM.

PRINTED BY BALLANTYNE AND HUGHES, EDINBURGH,

[ocr errors]

BLACKWOOD'S

EDINBURGH MAGAZINE.

No. CCLXXX. FEBRUARY, 1839.

VOL. XLV.

NEW EDITION OF BEN JONSON.

BEN JONSON by Barry Cornwall! This is really too much. The most masculine of intellects edited by the most effeminate-one of the greatest of England's poets patronized by one of her smallest poetasters. WILLIAM SHAKSPEARE by Thomas Campbell.

BEAUMONT AND FLETCHER by Robert Southey.

These are felt to be fitting conjunctions of names and natures, and we rejoice to hail the advent of auspicious times, when the most illustrious of the living perform pious service to the most illustrious of the dead; when star is seen joining star, never to set, in the Great Constellation, Genius, from age to age in widening splendour that wanes not glorifying the Hea

vens.

But mercy on us! BEN JONSON, by Barry Cornwall? an eagle heralded by a wren; or is it absolutely a tom-tit? What a MEMOIR!

"The life of Ben Jonson,"-quoth he," has been repeatedly written ; sometimes carelessly, and not unfrequently in a hostile spirit.", Always carelessly, and always in a hostile spirit, till Gifford took it in hand, and then it had justice done it-not " treme justice," as this "feckless body" says for these are words without meaning but the character of the man and the genius of the poet were brought forward in the broad daylight of truth.

ex

"Hereafter, the Memoirs of Mr Gifford must constitute the foundation for all arguments touching the poet's moral characVOL, XLV. NO. CCLXXX.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

phrases which, however sincerely bestowed, are, to say the least, injudicious in themselves; and, moreover, do not seem well adapted to herald a critical narrative, in which strict testimony and the rigour of the game' are very fiercely insisted upon, at the hands of every opponent.

mated Jonson too highly. But we shall venture an opinion on the old poet, before we conclude the present memoir; and, in speaking of his qualities as a writer, we may perhaps advert to those points in his moral character which his last biographer has so anxiously defended. In the mean time (and lest want of space or other circumstance should prevent this), we acknow

"We think that Mr Gifford has esti

K

ledge, with pleasure, that Mr Gifford has successfully vindicated him from many charges of baseness and ingratitude, and has presented his hero to the public in a new and pleasing light. It is a pity that all this was not accomplished with less acerbity towards other critics, and accompanied with more moderate pretension on behalf of the poet himself."

True "that hereafter the memoirs of Mr Gifford must constitute the foundation for all arguments touching the poet's moral character." More than that they furnish all the arguments necessary for its vindication, and to those arguments Barry Cornwall could not add one efficient word. Yet he ought to have shown how Gifford scattered, in his ire, all the accumulated calumnies of ages, like chaff before the wind. "We may perhaps advert to those points in his moral character which his last biographer has anxiously defended. In the mean time (and lest want of space or other circumstances should prevent this)," &c. &c. Who ever heard before of a biographer prefacing his memoirs of a great man, with an avowal of the uncertainty of his finding room to advert to any disputed points in his moral character!

[ocr errors]

Mr Barry Cornwall is pleased to object to the motto of Mr Gifford's book- which announces to the reader the spirit in which it is written." He wisely says, the motto "is not strictly a sample of the biography it self;" and then pretending to quote it, leaves out the lines which Gifford printed in capitals, to show that they were, in his opinion, the most characteristic of the poet's powers.

"The voice most echoed by consenting

[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]

ford's injudicious, excessive and undue eulogium, " it is small disparagement to Jonson to say that he stands second only to so wonderful a man (Shakspeare), and we think, on the whole, he must be held, in the drama, to occupy the second place. The palm should always be assigned to originality, and among the contemporaries of Shakspeare, Jonson was the most original.' This is no slight praise ! ! considering that amongst these were Marlowe, Beaumont and Fletcher, Marston, Decker, Middleton, Massinger, Tourneur, Ford, and others. Yet he says, "We think Mr Gifford has estimated Jonson too highly." Has that critic placed him, then, on the same level with Shakspeare? Nohe has said over and over again, that he stands far below Shakspeare-and scarified all the malignant fools who falsely accused Ben of enviously aim ing at rivalry with the Unreachable.

[ocr errors]

"We shall now enter upon our brief Memoir, premising that we are quite aware of the difficulties attending a task of this nature, and begging the reader to understand, that all the merit which we claim for ourselves, is the having spoken with sincerity on a subject, upon which it has already been the lot of many men to differ." No man should undertake a difficult task, without a well-founded assurance that he can accomplish it. It is not enough to "speak with sincerity;" he must speak with knowledge and power. Why should he be insincere? And what avails sincerity, if you show yourself to be a sumph? But there are no difficulties of any moment at tending the task of writing now a brief memoir of the Life and Wri tings of Ben Jonson. The materials, and far more than the materials, are in Gifford. Is the subject, on which "it has been the lot of many men to differ," the character of the man? Of that he declares, "with pleasure," that Gifford's vindication has been complete. Is it the genius of the poet? Upon that " it has not been the lot of many men to differ"-they have been unanimous in declaring it of the highest order. But Mr Cornwall has no rightful claim to the merit of sincerity-that virtue cannot exist along with prejudice and ignorance-and he has shewn himself very ignorant-and very prejudiced-equally regarding Ben Jonson's writings and his life.

"Ben Jonson was born in the City of Westminster, in the year 1574. His father, a Scottish gentleman from Annandale, was imprisoned, and deprived of his estate in the reign of Queen Mary (on account of his religious opinions, as is supposed), and died about a month before our author came into existence !"—that is "before Ben was born." Gifford says, "His grandfather was a man of some family and fortune, originally settled at Annandale, in Scotland, from which place he removed to Carlisle, and was subsequently taken into the service of Henry VIII. His father, who was probably about the Court, suffered a long imprisonment under Queen Mary, and was finally deprived of his estate. If religion was the cause, as is universally supposed, persecution only served to increase his zeal; for he entered, some time afterwards, into holy orders, and became, as Anthony Wood informs us, a grave minister of the gospel."" What does Barry Cornwall mean, then, by saying that Ben Jonson's father was a gentleman from Annandale? Why does he sink the grandfather? And why omit to tell that "the Scottish gentleman from Annandale," after his imprisonment became a clergyman? All this is wilful blundering with his eyes open, for Gifford's Memoir was lying on his table, and he had no other means of information with regard to these or any other facts.

Gifford's statement-taken from the "Heads of a Conversation"-of which more anon-is meagre and unsatisfactory enough-but 'tis stupid thus to misrepresent it, Gifford had no authority for saying that Jonson's grandfather" was a man of some family and fortune," though he may have been so; and there is no such "place" as Annandale "at" which the family of the poet's progenitors is said to have been "settled.' Annandale, Nithsdale, Tweeddale, Clydesdale, are districts-bordering each on its own beautiful river. Neither do we understand how Queen Mary of England could deprive a "Scottish gentleman" of his estate in Scotland. All that Ben Jonson said to Drammond was, that "his grandfather came from Carlisle, and, he thought, from Annandale to it; he served King Henry VIII., and was a gentleman. His father losed all his estate under

Queen Mary, having been cast in prison and for-faitted; at last turned minister, so he was a minister's son." "All his estate" must. mean merely "property;" and here we cannot help quoting a significant note of Sir Walter Scott's :-" By the way, if Jonson's grandfather actually came from Annandale, his name must have been Anglicized on his expatriation. There are no Jonsons, or Johnsons, in that district, but Johnstones full many." Was Ben, after all, an Englishman?

Heaven forbid! We believe that, like most great poets, he was of Scottish extraction; but we have a very doubtful account of his lineage.

Barry then takes Ben to Westminster, and removes him thence "either into St John's or Trinity College;" but he says that "the records of the University do not enable us to determine precisely where, nor how long he was a resident at Cambridge." They do not; for his name is not to be found in its records; and we agree with Mr David Laing, that "there is no evidence that he ever had the benefit of an academical education." Gifford gives plausible reasons for believing that he had been at Cambridge for many months-probably not less than a year. Barry Cornwall, who of himself knows nothing about the matter, sets them aside, or it is more likely never attended to them, and says that Jonson "was compelled, after a short stay of a few weeks or months, to quit the University." Had he been a Cantab, we think, he would have gloried in declaring it in the magnificent dedication of his Volpone, "To the most noble and most equal sisters, the two famous Universities."

Ben's mother, as all the world knows, having married a master brickmaker-no unequal match-BenCantab or no Cantab-" could not endure the occupation"—and in his 18th year joined the army in Flanders as a volunteer. Gifford says that having, "both from birth and education, probably been encouraged to look to the Church for an establishment, he was exceedingly mortified at this new destination"-that of a brickmaker. Therefore he gave both up, and became a soldier and then a player. Barry says—

"After a campaign or two, he returned home, having signalized himself, in the

« PreviousContinue »