| Father of Candor (pseud.), John Almon - Constitutional history - 1764 - 330 pages
...no crime for a jury to differ in opinion from the court, where he fays, " That a man cannot fee with another's eye, nor hear by another's ear; no more can a man conclude or infer the thing by another's underftanding or reafoning." From all which (I infift) it is very plain, " That the jury... | |
| William Eden Baron Auckland - Capital punishment - 1771 - 326 pages
...another " man, when fworn to do it, according to the " beft of their own knowledge ? A man cannot " fee by another's eye, nor hear by another's ear; " no more can a man conclude-, or infer the ft thing to be refohed by another's underjlanding " or reasoning; and though the verdict be " right,... | |
| Henry Dagge - Criminal law - 1774 - 268 pages
...d.er. termined in their verdict by their own knowkdge and underflanding ; for tb.at a man cannot fee by another's eye, nor hear by another's ear ; no more can a man conclude pr infer the thing to be refolved by another's. underftanding or r.eafo.ning : and therefore that though... | |
| Great Britain - 1811 - 840 pages
...certain freehold, and btproki, If legates, homines, and not of affinity with the parties concerned, fcc. if after all this, they implicitly must give a verdict...cannot see by another's eye, nor hear by another's •ar ; no more can a man conclude, or infer, the thing to be resolved by another's understanding,... | |
| William Cobbett - Great Britain - 1811 - 844 pages
...homines, and not of affinity with the parlies concerned, &c. if after all this, they implicitlyfnust give a verdict by the dictates and authority of another...to the best of their own knowledge ? A man cannot set by another's eye, nor bear by another's •ar ; no more can a man conclude, or infer, the thing... | |
| Trials - 1816 - 752 pages
...no crime for a jury to differ io opinion from the Court, where he says, That a man caunot see with another's eye, nor hear by another's ear ; no more can a man conclude or infer the thing by another's uaderstendMic or reasoning. From all which (1 insist) it № very plain, that the jury... | |
| Thomas Bayly Howell - Trials - 1817 - 726 pages
...— if after all this, they implicitly give a verdict by the dictates and authority of another man, when sworn to do it according to the best of their...cannot see by another's eye nor hear by another's car; no more can s mau conclude or infer the thing to be resolved by another's understanding or reasoning... | |
| English literature - 1827 - 530 pages
...the dictates and authority of another man, 460 Rights and Power of Juries. Oct." under pain of fine and imprisonment, when sworn to do it according to the best of their own knowledge f A man cannot see by another's eye, nor hear by another's ear ; no more can a man conclude or infer... | |
| Peleg Whitman Chandler - Law - 1841 - 462 pages
...no crime for a jury to differ in opinion from the court, where he says, " That a man cannot see with another's eye, nor hear by another's ear; no more can a man conclude or infer the thing by another's understanding or reasoning." From all which I insist it is very plain, " that the jury... | |
| Joshua Toulmin Smith - 1858 - 170 pages
...Poll ; to what end must they have in many cases the view, for their exacter information chiefly ; — if, after all this, they implicitly must give a verdict by the dictates and authority of another man ? A man cannot see by another's eye, nor hear by another's ears : no more can a man conclude or infer... | |
| |