« PreviousContinue »
polity was attended with quarrels, intrigues, schisms, and
Religion itself was made to consist of the performance of numerous ceremonies, of pagan, jewish, and monkish extraction, all which might be performed without cither faith in God, or love to mankind. The church ritual was an address, not to the reason, but to the senses of men; music stole the ear, and soothed the passions; statues, paintings, vestments, and various ornaments, beguiled the eye; while the pause, which was produced by that sudden attack, which a multitude of objects made on the senses, on entering a spacious decorated edifice, was enthusiastically taken for devotion. Blind obedience was first allowed by cour• tesy, and then established by law. Public worship was performed in an unknown tongue, and the sacrament was adored as the body and blood of Christ. The credit of the cerenioni.il produced in the people a notion, that the performance of it was the practice of piety, and religion degenerated into gross superstition. Vice, uncontrolled by reason or scripture, retained a pagan vigour, and committed the most horrid crimes; and superstition atoned for them, by building and endowing religious houses, and by bestowing donations on the church. Human merit was introduced, saints were invoked, and the perfections of God were distributed bv canonization, among the creatures of the Pope.
The piiiars, that supported this edifice, were immense riches, arising, by imposts, from the sins of mankind; idle distinctions between supreme and subordinate adoration; senseless ax'oms, called the divinity of the schools ; preachments of buffoonery, or blasphemy, or both; cruel casuistry, consisting of a body of dangerous and scandalous morality lfalse miracles and midnight visions ; spurious l ooks and paltry reiics; oaths, dungeons, inquisitions, and crusades. The whole was denominated The Holy, Catholic, Amd Apostolus Church, and laid to the charge of Jesus Christ.
Loud complaints had been made of these excesses, for the List hundred and fifty years, to those whose business it was to reform, and, bad as they were, they had owned the necestity of reformation, and had repeatedly promised to reform. Several councils had been called for the purpose of teformi.ig: but nothing had been done, nor could any thing be expected from asse mblies of mercenary men, who were too deeply interested in darkness to vote for day. They were inflexible flexible against every remonstrance, and, as a Jesuit has since expressed it, They would not .extiii. uish one taper, tho' it were to convert all the.IIugonots in France.
The restorers of literature reiterated and reasoned on these complaints: hut they reasoned to the wind. The church champions were hard driven, they tried every art to support their cause : but as they could neither get rid of the attack by a polite duplicity, nor intimidate their sensible opponents by anathemas, as they would not determine the matter by scripture, and as they could not defend themselves by any other method, as they were too obstinate to reform themselves, and to proud to be reformed Lv their inferiors, the plaintiffs at length laid aside thoughts of applying to them,and, having found out the liberty wherewith Christ had made them free, w ent about reforming themselves. The reformers were neither popes, cardinals, nor bishops; hut they were good men, who aimed to promote the vjory of God, and the good of mankind. This was the state of the church, when Francis I. ascended the throne, 1515.
Were we to enter into a m.aute examination of the reformation in France, we would own a particular interposition of Providence; but we would also take the liberty to o.bserve, that a happv conjunction of jarring interests rendered the sixteenth century a fit a?ra for refoimati^n. Events, that produced, protected, and persecuted reformation, proceeded from open and hidden, great and little, good and bad causes. The capacities and the tempers, the virtues and the vices, the views and the interests, the wives and the mistresses, of the princes of those times; the abilities and dispositions of the officers of each crown; the powers of government, and the persons who wrought them; the tempers and genuises of the people; all these, and many more, were springs of action, which, in their turns, directed the great events that were exhibited to public view. But our limits allow no inquiries of this kind.
The reformation, which began in Germany, had extended itself to Geneva, and thence into France. The French had a translation of the bible, which had been made, in 1224, by Guiars des Moulins. It had been revised, corrected, and printed at Paris, 1481, by order of Charles VIII. and the study of it now began to prevail. The reigning king, who was a patron of learning, encouraged his valet de chambre, Clement Marot, to versify some of David's psalms, and took
great great pleasure ifi singing them,* and either protected, or persecuted the reformation, as his interest seemed to him to require. Although in 1535, he went in procession to burn the first martyrs of the reformed church, yet, in the same year, he sent for Melancthon to come into France to reconcile religious differences. Although he persecuted his own protestant subjects with infinite inhumanity, yet, when he was afraid that the ruin of the German protestants would strengthen the hands of the emperor Charles V. he made an (dliance with the protestant princes of Germany, and allowed the Duke of Orleans, his second son, to offer them the free exercise of their religion in the Dukedom of Luxemburg. He suffered his sister, the Queen of Navarre, to protect the reformation in her country of Beam, and even saved Geneva, when Charles Duke of Savoy would have taken it. It was no uncommon thing, in that age, for princes to trifle thus with religion. His majesty's first concern was to be a king, his second to act like a rational creature.
1 he reformation greatly increased in this reign. Thi pious Queen of Navarre made her court a err, ert from every (Storm, supplied France with preachers, and the exiles at Geneva with money. Calvin who in 1S34., had fled front his rectory in France, and had settled at Geneva in 1541, was a chief instrument; he slid his catechism and other books into France. Some of the bishops were inclined to the reformation: but secretly, for fear of the christians of Rome. The reformation was cailed Calvinism. The people were named Sacramentarians, Lutherans, Calvinists: and nick-named Hugonots, either from Hugon, a Flobgoblin, because, to avoid persecution, they held their assemblie* in the night: or from the gate Hugon, in Tours, wherethey osed to meet; or from a Swiss word which signifies a league.
Henry TI. who succeeded his father Francis, 1547, wai a weak, and a wicked prince. The increase of his authority was tkt law arid the prophets to him. He violently persecuted
* fjis ffiajefty's fnvmirife pfalni, which ft* fang when he went a hunting Was the 4zd The queen ufed to fine the6th, arid the king'* miftress the 130th. Marot tranflated fifty, Beza the other hundred* Calvin pot them fet to Mufic bv the beft lnuficians, and every hody fang them as ballads. When th* reformed churches made them a part of their worfiiip, the papifts were forbidden to ling them any more, and to ling a I :..hn was a fign of a Lutheran,.
the calvinists of France, because he was taught to believe, that heresy was a faction repugnant to authority; and he .made an alliance with the German protestants, and was pleased with the title of Protector of the Germanic liberties, that is, protector of protestantism. This alliance he made in order to check the power of Charles V. He was governed, sometimes by his queen, Catharine de Medicis, niece of Pope Clement VII. who, it is said, never did right, except she did it by mistake: often by the constable da Montmorenci, whom, contrary to the express command of his father, in his dying illness, he had placed at the head o£ administration: chiefly by his mistress, Diana of Poitiers, wh& had been mistress to his father, and who bore an im-. placable hatred to the protestants: and always by some of his favourites, whom he suffered to amass immense fortunes, by accusing men of heresy. The reformation was very much advanced in this reign. The genuy promoted, the; acting of plays, in which the comedians exposed the lives, and doctrines of the popish clergy, and the poignant witj and humour of the comedians afforded infinite diversion to . the people, and'concilialcd them to the new pieachers. P*eza, who had fled to Geneva, 1548, came backward and forward into France, and was a chief promoter of the work. His Latin testament, which he first published in this reign, was. much read, greatly admired, 1556, and contributed to the strength of the cause. The new testament was the Goliah's sword of the clerical reformers, there was none like it,
Francis II succeeded his father Henry, 1559. He was. only in the sixteenth year of his age, extremely weak both, in body and mind, and therefore incapable of governing the kingdom by himself. In this reign began those civil wars,, which raged in France for almost forty years. They have been charged on false zeal for religion: but this charge is a calumny, for the crown of France was the prize for which the generals fought. It was that which inspired them with hopes and fears, productive of devotions, or persecutions, as either of them opened aacess to the throne. The interests of religion, indeed, fell in. with these views, and so the parties were blended together in war.
The family of Charles the Great, which had reigned in, France for 236 years, either became extinct, or was deprived of its inheritance, at the death of Lewis the Lazy in 987. Him Hugh Capet had succeeded, and had transmitted the crown to his own posterity, which, in this reign subsisted
sisted in two principle branches, in that of Valois, which was in possession of the throne, and that of Bourbon, the next heir to the throne of France, and then in possession of Beam. The latter had been driven out of the kingdom of Navarre: but they retained the title, and were sometimes at Beam and sometimes at the court of Fiance. The house of Guise, Dukes of Lorrain, a very rich and powerful family, to whose niece, Mary iQueen of Scots, the young king was married, pretended to make out their descent from Charles the Great, and were competitors, when the times served, with the reigning famiiy for the throne, and, at other times, with the Bourbon family, for the apparent heirship to it. With these views they directed their family alliances, perfected themselves in military skill, and intrigued at court for the administration of affairs. These threa houses formed three parties. The house of Guise, (the chiefs of which were five brethren at this time) headed one; the King of Navarre, the princes of the blood, and the great officers of the crown, the other; the Queen-mother, who managed the interests of the reigning family, exercised her policy on both, to keep either from becoming too strong; while the feeble child on the throne was alternately a prey to them all.
Protestantism had obtained numerous converts in the last reign. Several princes of the blood, some chief officers of the crown, and many principal families, had embraced it, and its partizans were so numerous, both in Paris and in all the provinces, that each leader of the court parties deliberated on the policy cf strengthening his party by openly espousing the reformation, by endeavouring to free the protestants from penal laws, and by obtaining a free toleration for them. At length, the house of Bourbon declared for protestantism, and, of consequence, the Guises were inspired with zeal for the support of the ancient religion, and took the roman catholics under their protection. The king of Navarre, and the prince of Conde, were the heads of the first: but the Duke of Guise had the address to obtain the chief management of affairs, and the protestants were persecuted with insatiable fury all the time of this reign.
Had religion then no share in these commotions? Certainly it had, with many of the princes, and with multitudes of the soldiers: hut they were a motley mixture; one fought for his coronet, another for his land, a third for liberty ot conscience, and a fourth for pay. Courage was a