Page images
PDF
EPUB

THE

GENERAL REPOSITORY

AND

REVIEW!

TO BE CONTINUED QUARTERLY.

4.

Vol. IV.

CAMBRIDGE:

PUBLISHED AND SOLD BY WILLIAM HILLIARD.

Printed by Hilliard & Metcalf.

1813.

P193.2

Note.

The description of Mr. West's picture, with which we were
favored by a friend, and which we have published, page 80, was
not an original communication, but was contained in a printed
pamphlet.

As it is desired to make the edition of Schleusner's Lexicon,
about to be printed at Cambridge, as correct as possible, all gen-
tlemen who may have noticed errors in the references in the Ger-
man edition, or any other not obvious errors of the press, are re-
quested to send information of them to the publishers, Messrs.
Cummings and Hilliard, Boston, or Mr. William Hilliard, Cam-
bridge, by whom any communications will be transmitted to the
gentleman who superintends the Cambridge edition.

THE

GENERAL REPOSITORY

FOR JULY, 1813.

Theological Department.

NEO TEMERE, NEC TIMIDE.

ON THE CANON OF SCRIPTURE.*

[ocr errors]

A review of D. Joh. Sal. Semler's Abhandlung von freyer Unter suchung des Canon; nebst Antwort &c. A dissertation for a free inquiry into the canon, with an answer to the Tubingen defence of the Apocalypse. Hall. 1771, pp. 292, 8vo.- -Vol. ii. with answers to reviews of the first. By Dr. J.S. Semler. Hall. 1772, pp. 640, 8vo. Translated from the German of John David Michaelis.-Orientalische und Exegetiche Bibliothek. Theil. iii. Frankfurt am Mayn. 1772.

THIS book will give no small trouble to reviewers, for it is alway's difficult to understand exactly what Dr. Semler would say; and yet the man, who must ask so much indulgence for his style, is so severe upon critics, that one can hardly expect to escape without being called simpleton, and his criticism foolish, if he should be so unfortunate as to contradict or misunderstand him. The modesty, with which he may express himself, will

[In the life of Semler, which was presented to our readers in the two first volumes of the Repository, there were many opinions of his, expressed by his biographer Eichhorn, from which, as was noticed then, the editor dissented. Some of those were his views of the canon of scripture, which we think are ably refuted, by Michaelis, in the following review of one of Semler's principal works. At the same time, we would observe, that it must be read with allowance, as there appears to have been a personal coldness between Michaelis and Semler. ED.]

Vol. IV. No. 1.

« PreviousContinue »