Theory and Practice in Interpersonal AttractionSteve Duck |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 87
Page 210
... significant interaction between similarity and description ( F = 1.273 , df = 1/56 ) . It can thus be concluded that attraction was strongly influenced by the affective value of information used to describe the other person . In ...
... significant interaction between similarity and description ( F = 1.273 , df = 1/56 ) . It can thus be concluded that attraction was strongly influenced by the affective value of information used to describe the other person . In ...
Page 228
... significant curvilinear com- ponent ( F = 12.07 , p < 0.01 ) . Although the multivariate F for the Similarity × Sex interaction was not significant ( see Table 1 ) , we feel that the significant univariate Fs for this interaction on ...
... significant curvilinear com- ponent ( F = 12.07 , p < 0.01 ) . Although the multivariate F for the Similarity × Sex interaction was not significant ( see Table 1 ) , we feel that the significant univariate Fs for this interaction on ...
Page 233
... significant , F = 2.05 , p < 0.10 ; the univariate F for marrying versus dating was significant , F = 5.42 , p < 0.01 . For males only , the multivariate F for the attractiveness effects on marrying versus dating and dating versus ...
... significant , F = 2.05 , p < 0.10 ; the univariate F for marrying versus dating was significant , F = 5.42 , p < 0.01 . For males only , the multivariate F for the attractiveness effects on marrying versus dating and dating versus ...
Contents
Tell me where is fancy bred some thoughts | 1 |
Reinforcement and affect in attraction Gerald L | 25 |
Information processing approaches to interpersonal | 51 |
Copyright | |
12 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acquaintance analysis analysis of variance approach Argyle attributes behaviour beliefs Byrne Clore cognitive comparison complementary needs computer dating concept condition consistent construct system context correlations couples dependent variables dimensions disclosure dissimilar Duck evaluation example expected experiment experimental explain factors females findings friends Gaipa groups Heilbronn hypothesis important indicated individual individual's interaction interpersonal attraction Interpersonal Judgment Scale involved Kelly Kerckhoff level of friendship main effect males marriage married married couples means microsociological negative neurotic nonneurotic nurturant stranger partner perceived perception Personal Construct Theory physical attractiveness positive possible predictions processes psychological questionnaire ratings reciprocity Reptest responses rewards ritual role scores self-concept self-esteem sexual significant skin conductance social exchange social psychology social relationships social skill someone stage stimulus person stimulus stranger subjects subset succorant stranger suggests traits University of Windsor validation vulnerability