Chattel Mortgage Brokers-Clerk of Council.
CHATTEL MORTGAGE BROKERS-Continued.
than as brokers, in the business of loaning money upon mort- gages on personal property. See French v. City, 160.
A parent may be guilty of the crime of failing to provide for his minor children, defined by act of April 28, 1908 (99 O. L., 228), although he is a resident of another state during time laid in the indictment, and the venue of the crime is in the county where the child is at time of complaint. See State v. Sanner, 393.
An action to recover for breach of written contract, in which default judgment is rendered by a justice of the peace, and which is appealed to common pleas court and determined, cannot under Section 5226, Revised Statutes, be appealed to the circuit court for a trial de novo. See Winters v. Ruff, 257. On error in the circuit court to the overruling of a motion for new trial on the ground of inadequacy of damages in an action for personal injuries, the circuit court may grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence. See Light Co. v. Mason, 463.
An order of the court of common pleas granting a temporary injunction, is not either a judgment or a final order which may be reviewed by the circuit court on petition in error, when. See May Co. v. Bailey Co., 471.
Where a corporation is formed for the purpose of transporting gas to certain named cities, towns and villages, and to others, it is not one of the charter obligations of such corporation to furnish gas to all of such cities, towns and villages. See Gas Co. v. City, 33.
Where the statute prescribes no person to execute a contract for the publication of legal notices, in behalf of a municipal corpora- tion, it is consistent with Section 1536-653, Revised Statutes, for the council to authorize the clerk thereof to execute such contract. See McCormick v. City, 246.
Collateral Heirs-Commissioners of County.
Under Section 6135, Revised Statutes, after the death of the widow, who is the sole heir and next of kin of the deceased husband, there is no beneficiary for whose benefit an action for the wrongful death of the said deceased, commenced by the widow as administratrix, can be maintained, although he had collateral heirs, and she had a mother, who survive. See Doyle v. Railroad Co., 184.
A common carrier, being the owner of tracks, is liable to its passenger for injury received in collision between its car and car of another carrier who has the joint use of the tracks, as result of the negligence of latter carrier-In such case the lia- bility of both companies may be enforced in same suit. See Light Co. v. Montgomery Co., 426.
A mortgagee, although he was not a party to and had no notice of the appraisement and award, in the absence of fraud or collusion, is bound by the award of appraisers provided for in a fire in- surance policy, to which is attached a "mortgage clause," which makes the loss payable to the mortagee as his interest may appear. See Brewing Co. v. Insurance Co., 1.
COMMISSIONERS OF COUNTY-
That part of Section 4903, Revised Statutes, which provides for compensation to county commissioners as directors of highways, is abrogated by act of April 21, 1904 (97 O. L., 254). See Thorn- iley v. State, 108.
Section 1166, Revised Statutes, does not require the county com- missioners to cause plans and specifications to be made for all road improvements. See Hibbard v. Biddle, 181.
The fees of the sheriff of a county to which a criminal prosecu- tion has been removed for trial, for services rendered in such case, should be allowed and paid by the commissioners of the county in which the indictment was found. Seee Thurlow v. Board, 447.
Commissioners of Park-Common Law.
COMMISSIONERS OF PARK-
The provision of Section 3 of act of May 9, 1908 (99 O. L., 440), relating to park commissioners, that all questions shall be de- cided by yea and nay vote entered on the journal, is mandatory. See Henderson v. City, 27.
COMMISSION FOR RAILROADS-
The common law forbids that an officer shall make a prospective appointment to fill an anticipated vacancy in an office the term of which cannot begin until after his own term has expired-This rule is neither abrogated nor modified by Section 1 of the act of April 2, 1906 (98 O. L., 342), creating a railroad commission, and requiring the governor to appoint in January, 1909, and biennally thereafter, one commissioner. See State v. Sullivan, 79.
The ruling in Lemmon v. State, 77 Ohio St., 427, does not apply to counties which do not contain a workhouse. See State v. Wirick, 343.
Where a passenger of a common carrier which owns the tracks is injured by the negligence of a carrier which is admitted to the joint use of such tracks, the liability of owning company for breach of contract of carriage, and the other for negligence, may be enforced in same suit-In such case the facts should be so determined that the liability may ultimately rest on the negli- gent carrier. See Light Co. v. Montgomery, 426.
The common law forbids that an officer shall make a prospective appointment to fill a vacancy in an office, the term of which cannot begin until after his own term has expired-Statutes are to be construed with reference to the common law, and the legisla- ture will not be presumed to have intended a repeal of the com- mon law, unless the language clearly expresses such intention, See State v. Sullivan, 79.
The common law rule that any agreement between the holder of a note and the principal, varying the contract of the surety, etc., without the latter's consent, releases the latter, is abrogated by Section 3175j, Revised Statutes. See Richards v. Bank Co., 348.
Common Pleas Court-Conclusive Evidence.
An action to recover for the breach of written contract in which default judgment is rendered by a justice of the peace, and which is appealed to the common pleas court and determined, cannot under Section 5226, Revised Statutes, be appealed to the circuit court for a trial de novo. See Winters v. Ruff, 257. On error in the circuit court to the overruling of a motion for new trial on ground of the inadequacy of the damages in an ac- tion for personal injuries, the circuit court may grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence. See Light Co. v. Mason, 463.
An order of the court of common pleas granting a temporary injunction is not either a judgment or a final order which may be reviewed by the circuit court on petition in error, when. See May Co. v. Bailey Co., 471.
COMPENSATION OF DISAPPOINTED DONEE- Lands devised to and rejected by a refractory donee amenable to the equitable doctrine of election, do not become intestate property, but they pass under the will to the disappointed donee, to such an extent as may be necessary to compensate him. See Bebout v. Quick, 196.
COMPENSATION TO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS- That part of Section 4903, Revised Statutes, which provides for compensation to county commissioners as directors of highways is abrogated by act of April 21, 1904 (97 O. L., 254), providing a salary and limiting the compensation to county commission- ers. See Thorniley v. State, 108.
COMPENSATORY DAMAGES-
In an action for ejectment from a street car, it is error for the court to instruct the jury that if ejectment was not justified, but was without malice or insult, compensatory damages only could be awarded. See Power Co. v. Matheny, 204.
The consideration clause in a deed is conclusive for the purpose of giving effect to the operative words, but for every other purpose it is open to explanation by parol proof, and is only prima facie evidence of the consideration. See Shehy v. Cun- ningham, 289.
Condemnation-Consideration for Note.
Where, in an action for compensation for land wrongfully taken by a municipality, it appears that the owners tendered a deed and offered to allow, upon judgment for value of the land, an order that they should convey title, the case is one to recover value of land, and not for condemnation within meaning of Section 1536-293, Revised Statutes; and when such judgment is final, under Section 1536-302, Revised Statutes, it is the duty of the trustees of the sinking fund to pay, and on refusal to do so mandamus will lie. See State v. Harrison, 98.
In an action for ejectment from a street car, evidence that pas- sengers left the car on account of plaintiff and companions, and complained to the conductor, whether within the hearing of plaintiff or not, is competent, when. In such a case it is error for the court to instruct the jury that if ejectment was with- out malice or insult, only compensatory damages could be awarded, when. See Power Co. v. Matheny, 204.
The common law rule that any agreement between the holder of a note and the principal, varying the contract of the surety, etc., without the latter's consent, releases the latter, is abro- gated by Section 3175j, Revised Statutes. See Richards v. Bank Co., 348.
CONSIDERATION CLAUSE IN DEED-
Conclusive for operative effect of deed-For other purposes, open to parol explanation-The consideration clause in a deed of con- veyance is conclusive for the purpose of giving effect to the operative words of the deed, but for every other purpose it is open to explanation by parol proof, and is prima facie evidence only of the amount, kind and receipt of the consideration. Shehy v. Cunningham, 289.
CONSIDERATION FOR NOTE-
Suit on promissory note-Defense of want of consideration—Bur- den of proof on plaintiff-Evidence-Where in a suit upon a promissory note the defense is that the note was given or ob- tained without a valuable consideration, the plaintiff has the affirmative of the issue and the burden of proof rests upon him, at every stage of the case, to show a consideration for the note,
« PreviousContinue » |