Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

And it is further ordered, adjudged and decreed by the court that the Commissioners heretofore appointed, namely, Alfred Hazlett, Esq., and John W. Halliburton, Esq., be, and they are hereby, directed to establish, or cause to be established, under their direction, permanent monuments marking said boundary line between the State of Missouri and the State of Nebraska, as shown by said aforesaid surveys, and that said Commissioners establish such permanent monuments upon said boundary line as may in their opinion be necessary for permanently marking and establishing the same, and that they make a report to this court of their acts and doings therein, and that said report contain a full and complete description of said boundary line and the monuments thereon established. And that in the execution of this decree said Commissioners are hereby authorized to employ such surveyors and other assistants, and procure such material as may be necessary in the establishment of said permanent monuments marking said boundary line, in accordance with the decree of this court.

And it is further ordered that said Commissioners be paid for their services herein such compensation as may be agreed upon by the respective parties to this suit and said Commissioners, and if the parties to this suit and said Commissioners are unable to agree upon said compensation, such compensation shall be awarded to said Commissioners as in the opinion of this court, upon the filing of the final report of said Commissioners, may seem proper.

It is further ordered that said Commissioners make said final report of their acts and doings in the premises to this court on or before the 15th day of May, 1905.

MARCH 6, 1905.

197 U.S.

Opinions Per Curiam, Eto.

OPINIONS PER CURIAM, ETC., FROM FEBRUARY 21

TO APRIL 10, 1905.

No. 312. EDWARD D. JOHNSON ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. ELIZABETH THOMAS. Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. Motion to dismiss submitted February 20, 1905. Decided February 27, 1905. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; Lubin v. Edison, 195 U. S. 625; Lodge v. Twell, 135 U. S. 235; Haseltine v. Central Bank, 183 U. S. 130. Case below, 23 App. D. C. 141. Mr. D. W. Baker and Mr. Wm. Robert Andrews in support of motion. Mr. S. Herbert Giesy in opposition thereto.

No. —, Original. Ex parte: IN THE MATTER OF PETER MILLER AND THOMAS SHEPPERSON, PETITIONERS. March 20, 1905. Motion for leave to file petition for writs of habeas corpus denied. Mr. Thomas M. Patterson, Mr. Charles S. Thomas and Mr. Milton Smith for petitioners.

No. 201. W. J. WARDER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. MRS. LAURA LOOMIS ET AL. In crror to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Argued April 7, 1905. Decided April 10, 1905. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Spencer v. Duplan Silk Company, 191 U. S. 526; Arbuckle v. Blackburn, 191 U. S. 405; Continental National Bank v. Buford, 191 U. S. 119; Blackburn v. Portland Gold Mining Company, 175 U. S. 571; Washer v. Bullitt County, 110 U. S. 558. Mr. Thomas H. Clark, Mr. A. Seymour Thurmond and Mr. Jay Good for plaintiff in error. Mr. Millard Patterson and Mr. T. J. Beall for defendants in error.

Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari.

197 U. S.

Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari from

February 21 to April 10, 1905.

No. 458. THE LUDINGTON NOVELTY COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. CHARLES H. LEONARD ET AL. February 27, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. Fred L. Chappell and Mr. George A. Prevost for petitioner. Mr. Edward Taggart and Mr. Arthur C. Denison for respondent.

No. 495. THE MERCHANTS AND MINERS TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, ETC., ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. THE STEAMSHIP THORNHILI, ETC. February 27, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Mr. Robert H. Smith and Mr. Daniel H. Hayne for petitioners. Mr. J. Parker Kirlin for respondent.

No. 525. James Talcott ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. HENRY FRIEND ET AL. February 27, `1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. Mr. Horace Kent Tenney for petitioners. Mr. Jacob Newman, Mr. Benj. V'. Becker and Mr. Solomon Levinson for respondents.

No. 527. MARCELLUS E. THORNTON ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. THE BOARD OF MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF NATCHEZ ET AL. February 27, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Mr. Wade R. Young for petitioners. Mr. Eaton J. Bowers and Mr. Marcellus Green for respondents.

No. 521. THE REMBERT ROLLER COMPRESS COMPANY, PETITIONÈR, v. THE AMERICAN Corron COMPANY ET AL. March 6,

197 U.S.

Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari.

1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Mr. Walter Gresham for petitioner. No one opposing.

No. 543. GEORGE E. ZARTMAN, As TRUSTEE, PETITIONER, v. THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF WATERLOO, N. Y. March 6, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. George E. Zartman for petitioner. Mr. W. H. Sholes for respondent.

No. 533. THE UNITED STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ETC., PETITIONER, v. AGNES McMAHON ET AL. March 13, 1905.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Mr. George Clark for petitioner. Mr. A. L. Beaty and Mr. C. H. Smith for respondents.

No. 540. John T. McGRAW ET AL., PETITIONERS, 1. SAMUEL B. WOODS ET AL. March 20, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Mr. Holmes Conrad, Mr. John H. Holt and Mr. Melville D. Post for petitioners. Mr. L. L. Lewis for respondents.

No. 551. TENNESSEE OIL, GAS AND MINERAL COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. F. D. BROWN ET AL. April 3, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Mr. Harvey D. Goulder and Mr. H. H. Ingersoll for petitioner. Mr. Edward T. Sanford and Mr. C. E. Lucky for respondents.

Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari.

197 U.S.

No. 557. CENTRAL COMMERCIAL COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE, ET AL. April 3, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. Mr. Lewis W. Parker for petitioner. No one opposing.

No. 558. THE BOSTON WATER AND LIGHT COMPANY, PETITIONER, V. THE FARMERS' LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE, ET AL. April 3, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. Mr. S. S. Gregory and Mr. C. H. Poppenhusen for petitioner. Mr. John S. Runnells and Mr. William Burry for respondents.

No. 559. THE NEW ENGLAND WATER WORKS COMPANY ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. THE FARMERS' LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE, ET AL. April 3, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. Mr. James Hamilton Lewis for petitioners. Mr. John S. Runnells and Mr. William Burry for respondents.

No. 567. IONIA TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. J. I. CASE THRESHING MACHINE COMPANY, CLAIMANT, ETC. April 3, 1905. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. Mr. John C. Richberg for petitioner. Mr. George D. Van Dyke for respondent.

No. 583. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BALTIMORE, PETITIONER, v. WILLIAM H. STAAKE, TRUSTEE, ETC., ET AL.; and No. 584. HENRY K. McHARG ET AL., RECEIVERS, ETC., ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. WILLIAM H. STAAKE, TRUSTEE, ETC. April 3,

« PreviousContinue »