Historiography of India's Partition: An Analysis of Imperialist Writings
An Attempt Has Been Made In This Book To Examine The Writings Of The Oxbridge Scholars Who Have Based Their Studies On Different Assumptions And Have Tried To Cover Various Issues Related To The Partition Of India. The Author Has Made A Serious Effort To Trace The Course Of The British Historiography Of India S Partition. In The Light Of New Research And Facts, Several Age-Old, Deliberate But Fallacious Assumptions And Constructs Have Been Deconstructed. In The Process Of This Analysis Several Gaps Have Been Detected And The Underlying Aims Of The Imperialist Efforts Have Been Exposed. On The Top Of It, Various Sophisticated Versions Of The Theories Of Civilizing Mission And Whiteman S Burden In The Post-Colonial Context Have Been Challenged On Several Counts. In Spite Of Several Changes In The Imperialist Writings, It Has Been Found That Even The Neo-Imperial Historians Have Been Extending Their Support To The Several Myths, Deliberately Created By The Orthodox Imperial Ideologues About India S Past And Present. The Only Difference Is That The Former Have Been More Delicate And Sophisticated In Their Presentations. Thus, This Book Opens Up New Areas For Further Research And Will Generate More Curiosity Among The Students Of Indian, Pakistani And British History And Those Who Are Concerned With The Problems Of Nationalism And Decolonisation.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accepted argues August Bengal blames Bombay Britain's British British Government C.H. Philips Calcutta calls civil colonial regime Commonwealth communal Conference Congress Working Committee constitutional council Cripps Crisis cultural December decided defend Delhi demand discussion divide division Empire fact failed failure February federation formed Freedom further Gandhi Government Hindu historians historiography History Hodson Ibid ideologues imperial imperialist important independence Indian Problem interest interpreted issues Jinnah Johnson July June Lahore leaders London Lord majority Mansergh March meeting Mission Modern India Mountbatten movement Muslim League national movement nationalist natural Nehru objective October Offer opines Oxford Pakistan partition of India passed Penderal Moon Percival Spear period Plan political proposed provinces Punjab Quit R.J. Moore reason regarded rejected representative Resolution responsible role rule says scholars separate situation Social society started statement struggle Studies transfer of power tried United Viceroy Wavell writings