Page images
PDF
EPUB

TABLE OF CONTENTS.

..79

Abercrombie v. Alderson,........... 981 Beazley, et al. v. Mitchell..............780

Abercrombie's Adm'r v. Chandler,. 625 Bell, use, &c. v Moore,....... .823

Adams v. Frampton,.....

124 Berryman v. Judge of Lawrence co. 455

Alderson and Abercrombie, ..981 Billing and Reese....

..263

Alexander v. Hutchison,..... .825 Bird v. Daniel,..

.302

Alexander and Hall,.....

.219 Bissell & Carville v. Lindsay,.......162

Alston and Hogan, surv'r,

.627: Blackwell and The State,.....

Anderson, et al. v. Hooks, et al,......704 Blakey, Adm’r y. Heirs of Blakey,.391

Anderson v. Snow f. Co...... 247 Blakey's Heirs and Blakey, Adm'r, 391

Anslev v. Carlos,

973 Boaz, et al. and Elliott,

..772

Armstead v. Thomas,..

.586 Bohannan v. Springfield, ....789

Arrington and Evans and Keeland, .42 Bolling, et al. and Lyon, ....463

Atwood and Pierson,

.656 Bolling v: Carter & Womack,.......921

Auld and Spear f- James, ..462 Bonsadon and Miller,

..317

Austin v. Pickett,..

102: Borum v. Garland & Borum,

Ayres and Davis,
.292, Bowen v. Snell,.

..481

Babcock v. Huntington, .869 ? Boykin and Br. Bank at Mobile, .320

Babcock & Griffin v. Williams,..

..150 Bradford and Hagertv,..

.567

Bacon and Gee,

.699 Bradley v. Gibson,.

406

Bagby, use, v. Harris,...

.173 Brassfield, et al. and Pierce,.. .573

Bagby, Gov. and Chandler & Chan Brazeal's Adm'r v. Brazeal's Distri.

dler,....

.770 butees,..

491

Bank Br. at Mobile v. Boykin........320 Brazeal's Distributees and Brazeal's

Bank of the State and Dew, .323

Adm'r,

491

Bank at Decatur v. Douglass........853 - Brooks and The State,....

.9

Bank Br. at Montg'y v. Gaffney, ...153 Broughton, et al. and Colburn et al. 351

Bank at Huntsville and Griffin, ....201 Browder v. The State,

..58

Bank at Decatur v. Hodges..........631 Brown et al. and Turner et al ...866

Bank Br. at Mobile v. Hood & Stin Brown and English, et al.

.504

nett,

.335, Brown v. Little,...

..416

Bank P.J.M.v. King, Upson & Co. 279: Brownrigg and Roberts,

.106

Bank Br. at Mobile v. James et al. .949: Bunnell v. Magee,

.433

Bank at Decatur v. Johnson,..... 622 Burt and Mitchell,.

.226
Bank P. & M. and Bank of Mobile, 645 Burt v. Parish & Co.

.211
Bank of Mobile v. P. & M. Bank,...645 Burgess and Holly, ..

.728
Bank of State v.Johnson & Jefffries, 367, Bush v. Barney,

.345
Bank at Decatur v. Spence, .800 Butler and Pryor & Fisher, .418
Bank B'r at Mobile and Stinnett & Byrd v. Odem,.....

.755

Townsend,..

.120 Campbell and Patterson,

.933

Bank Br. at Mobile v. Thompson,...295 Cannon and Williams,

.318

Bank of Orleans et al. and Wilson, 847, Carlisle and Davis,.

.858

Bank at Montg’y and Whetstone, .875 Carlos and Ansley,

.973

Barnett and Snedicor.........

.434 Carter v. Mercer,....

..556

Barney v. Bush,

..345 Carter & Womack and Bolling, ..921
Barney v. Frowner and wife, .901 Carville, use, &c. v. Reynolds, ..969
Bartlett & Waring and Davenport, 179 Cawthorn v. McCraw, ..

.519
Battle v. The Corporation of Mobile, 234 Chambers v. Stone & Pope, ..260

[blocks in formation]

325

Chandler and Abercrombie's Adm'r, 625 Gilchrist v. Gilmer,..

.985

Chandler & Chandler and Bagby, Gillian y. Senter,

.395

Goy.
1.770 Gilmer and Gilchrist,

.985
Clements and Lowry et al....
.422 Givens v. Lawier,

.543
Clough v. Johnson,

425 Goodwin et al. and Turnipseed,......372

Cobb v. Miller, Riply & Co. 499 Governor v. Chandler & Chandler, 770

Colburn et al. v. Broughton et al....351 | Gov. use, &c. v. Davis & Robinson, 917

Cole v. Flournoy,

.401 { Governor ex rel and Powell,............36

Cole & Co. and Grant,

.366 Governor, use, v. Powell,..

..83

Collins, use, &c. and Wilson, .127 Glaze and The State,

.283

Conner and Stewart,
.803 Grant v. Cole & Co......,

..366

Cook and Napier,

.838 }Graves y. The State,

..447

Cooper v. Frederick,

.738 } Green I wife and Pinkston & wise, .18

Costillo and Keho v. Thompson, .737 {Griffin v. Br. B’k at Huntsville,......201

Craig, Adm'r, and Sorrelle, ...534 Hagerty v. Bradford, ........ ...567
Crawford v. Slade, Adm'r,..... .887 Hair v. Moody,

399

Creagh and Forwood v. Savage, ....959 Hale and Pharr & Beck, .312

Crimms, Adm'r, v. Townsend,.. 403 Hall v. Alexander,

.219

Crommelin v. Minter,......... ..594 Hall et al. y. The State,

.827

Cunningham and wife y. Poole, .615 Hall, Weeks & Co. v. Darrington,.502

Daniel and Bird,

..302 Hall v. Hrabrowski,

..278

Daniel v. Sorrelle et al.....

.436 Hall and Duncan, use, &c

.128

Darrington and Hall, Weeks g. Co. 502 Hanrick & Powell v. Thompson, ...409

Davenport v. Bartlett & Waring, ... 179 Hardie v. Turner,

.110

Davis v. Ayres,
292 Harris and Bagby, use, 8-c..

173

Davis and Carlisle,

..858 Harris v. Martin,

895

Davis & Robinson and the Gov'nor 917 Harrison v. Harrison et al..

.470

Debard v. Smith,

788 Harrison et al. and Harrison,

.470

Dew v. The State Bank,

413 Harrison, adm'r, and Harrison,

...73

Donnell and Jones g. Co.
695 Harrison v. Harrison, adm'r,....

.....73

Donnell and O'Neill,

..734 Harrison et al. v. Foster et at........955

Douglass v. The Bank at Decatur,.853 Harrison & wife et al. and Hearne,
Dumas & Co. v. Patterson et al.....484 adm'r,....

.731
Duncan, use, &c. Hall,...

128 Harwood's Ex'r v. Humes,.. ..659

Dunham and The State,...

..76 Hawkins y. The State,

.137

Easley v. Moss, ..

266 } Haynes v. Wheat & Fennell, .239

Eastwood and Shippey et al. .198 Hayes v. O'Connel,..

.488

Elliott ct al v. Boaz et al.

.772 { Head, use, &c. y. Shaver & Adams, 791

English et al v. Brown,..... .504 } Hearne, adm'r, v. Harrison & wife,

Evans and Arrington v. Keeland,

et al. .....

.731

Evans and Matthews........ ..613 Henry and Sewall...

.24

Ex parte Ryan et al.....
89 Hill et al v. Hill's Adm'r .

793

Faulk et al v. The State,

.919 { Hill and Fitzpatrick's adm'r,

783

Fellows, Wadsworth & Co. v. Tann, 999 Hodge v. Thompson,

.131

Findley et al. and Woodley,..........716 Hodges and Bank at Decatur,.. 631

Fitzpatrick's adm'r v. Hill,. .783 Hogan, sury'r, v. Alston ,..... 627

Fleming and Smith,....

.768 Holly and Burgess,

728

Flournoy and Cole,..

.401 Hood f. Stinnett v. Br B'k Mobile, 335
Foster et al. and Harrison et al,......955 Hooks et al. and Anderson et al.....704
Frampton and Adams,

.124 Hrabrowski and Hall,.......... .278
Frederick and Cooper,..... .738 Hudson, guardian, v. Parker,... .413
Freeny v. Ware & Warren,..... ..370 Huie and Pinkston,

..252
Frowner and wife and Barney, ..901 Humes v. Harwood's Ex'r,.. ..659
Gaffney and Br. B’k at Montg’y, ...153 } Huntington and Pippin,

.228

Garland g. Borum and Borum, .452 { Huntington and Babcock,

.869

Garrett, adm'r, y. Ricketts et al. ....529 Hunter v. Whitworth et ux et al.....965

Garrett v. Rhea, adm'r,

.131 {Hurst and the Montg’y R. R. CO.....513

Gary v. Terrell,

206 {Hutchison and Alexander,... .825

Gee v. Bacon,

.699} Iverson y. Shorter et al...

.713

Gee and Murphy & Pierson, 276 Jackson y. Gewin,

.114
Gewin and Jackson,
.114 James v. Auld & Spear,

462
Gibson and Bradley,
406 James y. Scott,

.579

James v. Stewart & Rainey, .........855 Mitchell and Beazley ..........780

James et al and The Br. B'k Mobile, 949 Mitchell v. Burt...

.226

Jenkins' adm'r and Jennings & Gra- Mobile, Corporation of, and Battle . 234

ham, .......

..285 Mobile, Corp'n of, and Stewart.......234

Jennnings - Graham v. Jenkins'ad- Mobley, Ex'r, v. Pickett,

.97
ministrator,
.285 Moody and Hair

.399
Johnson & Jeffries and The Bank Moore and Bell, use of, f.C......

.823
of the State,'.
..367 } Morgan v. Lamar, Ex'r

.231

Johnson and Clough,....
425 Moss and Easley,

.266

Johnson & Norris v. McLaughlin, 551 Moss and Yarborough...

.282

Johnson and the B’k at Decatur, ...622 Murphy & Pierson v. Gee, ..276

Johnson and Lockhart...
.223 Myatt v. Luckhart & Massey

........91

Johnston and Shanklin,
..271 Napier v. Cook

838

Jones & Co. v. Donnell..... .....695 Nelms and McKeen and wife 507

Judge Lawrence co. and Berryman,455 Nelms' cred. and McLaughlin, adm 925

Juzan et al v. Toulmin,..

.662 Newhouse et al v. Miles et al. 460

Kain and Sheppard.
..119 Noland y. Wickham

169

Keeland and Evans J. Arrington......42 O'Connel and Hayes....

488

Kelly v. Renfro,..
.325 Odem and Byrd

755

Kelly's adm'r v. Kelly's distributees, 908 |Oden and Stubblefield..

..651

Kelly's distributees and Kelly's ad'r, 908 Olds and Powell

.861

King, Upson & Co. and P.&M. B'k 279 O'Neill v. Donnell

.734

Kizer y. Lock....

.269 Palmer v. Severance & Steward, ... 751

Krebs and Lyon......
.426 Parish & Co. and Burt, .

.211

Lamar, Ex'r, and Morgan,..... .231 } Parker and Hudson, guardian 413

Landreth's adm'r v. Landreth's dist. 430 Patterson and Campbell

..933

Landreth's dist. and Landreth's ad'r, 430 Patterson et al. and Dumas.... ...484

Lawler and Givens,

543 Pharr & Beck v. Hale.......... .312

Lay and Stiles ...

.......795 Pharr & Beck and Reynolds, adm'r 560

Lindsay and Bissell & Carville,......162 Pickett and Austin

.102

Little and Brown,
.416 Pickett and Mobley, Ex’r..

97

Lock and Kizer,
269 Pierce v. Brassfield et al...

.573

Lockhart v. Johnson,...
.223 Pierson and Atwood,

...656

Lockhart of Massey and Myatt .91 Pinkston and wife v. Green and wife 19

Long and Rainey,
.754 Pinkston v. Taliaferro....

..547

Lowry et al v. Clements,
.422 Pinkston v. Huie ......

.252

Lyon v. Bolling et al.

.463 Pippin v. Huntington,.... ...228

Lyon v. Krebs

426 Poole and Cunningham and wife.. 615

Magee and Bunnell ...

.433 Powell and Governor, use,..

Marning and Tatum et al .144 Powell v. Olds

861

Martin and Harris

895 Power v. Governor, ex rel............. 36

Matthews v. Evans
643 Price et al v. White

563

May v. The State....
..167 } Pryor f. Fisher v. Butler

418

McCraw v. Cawthorn...

.519 Purdom y. Tipton et al......... .914

McIntyre and Miller f. Cobb .......638 Pursell v. McQueen's adm'r .380

McKeen and wife v. Nelms 507 Rail R. Co. Montg‘y, use, v. Hurst 513

McLaughlin and Johnson & Norris 551 Rainey and Treadwell... ....590

McLaughlin, adm'r, v. Nelms' cred. Rainey v. Long

...754

itor ...

925} Redus and wife and Smith. .....99

McNeill's ex'r v. Reynolds... .313 Reese y. Billing,

..263

McQueen's adm'r and Pursell .380 | Renfro and Kelly...

...325

McRae et al. and Shute & Hackett 931 Reynolds and Carville, use, &C.......969

McRoberts et al and Worthington...297 Reynolds' adm’r v. Pharr & Beck..560

Meacham y. Williams et al....... .842 | Reynolds and McNeill's Ex'r.........313

Mercer and Carter

.556 Ricketts et al.and Garrett, adm'r,...529

Miller, Ripley & Co. and Cobb .499 Rhea, adm'r, and Garrett

..134

Miller and Steamboat Engineers...511 Rhodes v. Sherrod.....

..63

Miller v. Bonsadon .....
317 | Roberts v. Brownrigg

.106

Miller & Cobb v. McIntyre... .638 Rogers and Walters..

.834

Miles et al. and Newhouse et al... 460 Ryan, ex parte

.89

Minter and Crommelin
.594 Samples v. Walker

726

Mitchell and Spence ...

744 Savage and Creagh f. Forwood......959

.......... 83

Scott and James,..

..579 Stinnett & Townsend v. Br. B Mob. 120

Senter and Gillian.....

395' Stone & Pope and Chambers... ...260

Severance f. Stewart and Palmer ..751 Stubblefield v. Oden

.. 651

Sewall v. Henry,...
.24; Taliaferro and Pinkston

547

Shanklin v. Johnson

.271 Tann and Fellows, Wadsworth&Co.999

Shaver & Adams and Head. .791 Tatum et al v. Manning

144

Sheppard v. Kain......
.119 Taylor and Smith...

.633

Sherrod and Rhodes
.63 Terrell and Gary

.206

Shippey et al. v. Eastwood... .198 Thomas and Armistead

586

Shorter and Iverson et al. .713 Thompson and Costello & Keho......937

Shute & Hackett v. McRae et al......931 Thompson and Hodge...... ..131

Slade, adm'r, and Crawford 887 Thompson and Hanrick & Dowell . 409

Smith and Debard...

.788} Thompson and Br. Bank at Mobile 1295

Smith v. Fleming..
.768 Thornton v. Winter

613

Smith f. Co. v. Zurcher, use, &c... 208 Ticknor & Day v. Wiswall... ..305

Smith v. Redus and wife
.99} Tipton et al and Purdom

914

Smith v. The State
990 Toulmin and Juzan et al

662

Smith v. Taylor

.633 } Townsend and Crimm's adm'r...... 403

Snedicor v Barnett

434 Treadwell v. Rainey ......... 590

Snell, use, fc. v. Bowen

.481 Turner et al. v. Brown et al... .866

Snoddy v. Watt
..609 Turner and Hardie ....

110

Snow & Co. and Anderson.. .247 { Turnipseed v. Goodwin et al. .372

Sorrelle et al v. Daniel..... 1.436Walker and Samples ...

..726

Sorrelle v. Craig, adm'r, ,
.534 Walters y. Rogers

834

Spence v. The Decatur Bank. .800 Ware & Warren v. Freeny. 370

Spence v. Mitchell
744 Watt and Snoddy....

..609

Springfield and Bohannon.. .789 { Wheat & Fennell and Haynes...... 239

Standifer v. White

.527 } Whetstone v. Bank at Montg'y......875

State v. Blackwell...
..79 White and Price et al

.563

State v. Brooks.......
9 White and Standifer

.527

State and Browder.

.58 Whitworth & wife et al and Hunter 965

State ex rel v. The Circuit Judge. .338 { Wickham and Noland.... ...169

State v. Dunham
..76 Williams v. Cannon

348

State and Faulk et al

.919 Williams and Babcock & Griffin......150

State y. Glaze

.283 } Williams et al and Meacham ....... 842

State and Graves...
..447 Willis v. Willis' adm'r....

..721

State and Hall et al

.827 Willis' adm'r y. Willis' heirs .........330

State and Hawkins

.137 Willis' heirs and Willis' adm'r 330

State and May

.167 Wileon v. The Bank of Orleans et al 847

State and Smith...
990 Wilson v. Collins, use,.........

....127

Steamboat Engineers v. Miller ..511 Winter and Thornton

...613

Stewart y. The Cor. of Mobile ...234 { Wiswall and Ticknor & Day, 305

Stewart v. Conner.....

.803 } Woodley v. Findley et al. ...716

Stewart & Rainey and James. .......855 Worthington, ad. v. McRoberts et al 297

Stiles v. Lay......
..795 | Yarborough v. Moss

382

Zurcher, use, &c. and Smith & Co. 208

REPORTS

OF

CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED

JANUARY TERM, 1846.

THE STATE v. BROOKS.

1. The tenth chapter of the penal code provides the manner by which grand

jurors shall be constituted, and one constituted in any other mode has no legal warrant. When, however, the board of officers intrusted with the selection of the jury, has made the necessary certificate, there is no mode

by which its action can be collaterally called in question or re-examined. 2. Although the board is limited to the selection of individuals who are

house-holders and free-holders, and of integrity for character and sound judgment, and cannot lawfully select individuals of various specified avocations, professions and callings, yet the selection of those will not vitiate

an indictment found by a jury of which they are members. 3. Under the code, a challenge to the array, or a plea in abatement to the

panel, invokes the enquiry only, whetuer the jury has been selected in the mode directed, and on such issue, the certificate of the board is conclu

sive. 4. This certificate may be made by the attending officers, or the clerk of the

county coart, when one ef them: 5. When the matter of a plea in aba nent the disqualification of a juror,

laying out of view the direction to summon free-holders and house-holders, as to which no opinion is given—it must present the constitutional disqualification of conviction for bribery, &c. &c. Matters which exempt individnals from jury service, are not disqualifications which will abate an indictment.

« PreviousContinue »