Page images
PDF
EPUB

...528

Lingenfelter v. Baltimore, Lucas v. Nichols, 66 Ill. 41...323

etc., R. Co., 154 Ind. 49....625 Lucas v. Pennsylvania Co., Lippman v. People, 175 Ill. 120 Ind. 205....

67 101

.571 | Lucas v. Pittman, 94 Ala. 616 Little v. Thompson, 24 Ind.

451 146

.343 Luce v. Fensler, 85 Iowa 596.154 Lobdell v. Lobdell, 36 N. Y. Lutz v. City of Crawfords327

285 ville, 109 Ind. 466..........579 Lomax v. Bailey, 7 Blackf. Lutz v. Gates, 62 Iowa 513..646 603

483 Long v. Ruch, 148 Ind. 74... 99 Maddux v. Watkins, 88 Ind. Long v. State, 12 Ga, 293..693 74

.318, 320 Long v. Williams, 74 Ind. 115 Magel v. Milligan, 150 Ind. 627 582

..291 Loring v. Loring, 100 Mass. Magnuson v. Billings, 152 340

.469, 470
Ind. .177.

36 Loscombe v. Russell, 4 Sim. Magoun v. Saving Bank, 170 8 .295 U. S. 283.

..556 Loucheim y. Seeley, 151 Ind. Maloney v. Newton, 85 Ind. 665 .502 565

.618 Louisville, etc., R. Co. v. Malott v. Hawkins, 159 Ind. Ader, 110 Ind. 376. .277

496, 679 Louisville, etc., R. Co. v. Malott v. Shimer, 153 Ind. 35 Bates, 146 Ind. 564.. .205

679 Louisville, etc., R. Co. V. Manufacturers' Gas, etc., Co. Boney, 117 Ind. 501.

v. Indiana Gas, etc., Co., Louisville, etc., R. Co. V.

155 Ind. 566.

.221 Bryan, 107 Ind. 51..69, 70, 277 Marcy, etc., Co. v. Flint, etc., Louisville, etc., R. Co. V.

Co., 158 Ind. 173.

..669 Caldwell, 98 Ind. 245. .540 Mark v. North, 155 Ind. 575..166 Louisville, etc., R. Co. V. Martin v. Barbour, 140 U. S. Creek, 130 Ind. 139. .664 634

1.392 Louisville, etc., R. Co.

Martin v. Cauble, 72 Ind. 67 Donnegan, 111 Ind. 179. .672

205 Louisville, etc., R. Co. v. Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 1 Kemper, 147 Ind. 561.....613 Wheat. 304..

..561 Louisville, etc., R. Co. V. Martin v. Marks, 154 Ind. 549 Lucas, 119 Ind. 583..

67

221, 222, 224 Louisville, etc., R. Co. V. Martin v. Martin, 118 Ind. 227 Nitsche, 126 Ind. 229. .424

287 Louisville, etc., R. Co. V. Martin v. Martin, 16 B. Mon. Pritchard, 131 Ind. 564,....192 8

.323 Louisville, etc., R. Co. V. Martin v. Wills, 157 Ind. 153 Reynolds, 118 Ind. 170....484

94 Louisville, etc., R. Co. v. Massachusetts Soc. v. City of Smith, 91 Ind. 119.

192 Boston, 142 Mass. 24... .641 Louisville, etc., R. Co. V. Massey V. Dunlap, 146 Ind. State, 122 Ind. 443. .528 350

.590 Louisville, etc., R. Co. V. Matchett v. Cincinnati, etc.,

State, 8 Ind. App. 377......528 R. Co., 132 Ind. 334.. ...667 Louisville, etc., R. Co. V. Matter of Blewitt, 131 N. Y. Whitlow (Ky. Ct. App.), 43 541

.100 S. W. 711..

28 Matter v. Campbell, 71 Ind. Louisville Underwriters V.

512

..577 Durland, 123 Ind. 544......507 Mayor v. Manhattan R. Co., Lowe v. Turpie, 147 Ind. 632 143 N. Y. 1.

..536 48, 51, 362 McArthur v. Scott, 113 U. S. Lowery v. State Life Ins. 340

1.470 Co., 153 Ind. 100..

.118

v.

McCallister v. Mount, 73 Ind. Merrill v. State, 156 Ind. 99. .158 559

.663 Merritt v. Richey, 127 Ind. 400 McCarren v. McNulty, 7 Gray

367 (Mass.) 139.

.540 | Metropolitan Ins. Co. V. McCarthy Metropolitan Schaffer, 50 N. J. L. 72....464 Life Ins. Co., 162 Mass. 254 Michigan, etc., Ins. Co. v.

464 Frankel, 151 Ind. 534..299, 362 McClamrock v. Flint, 101 Ind. Middleton v. Greeson, 106 278 .330 Ind. 18..

..132 McClung Copehart, 24 Midland Nat. Bank v. BrightMinn. 17. .294 well, 148 Mo. 358.

.296 McClure v. Briggs, 58 Vt. 82.540 Midland R. Co. v. St. Clair, McClure v. Raben, 125 Ind. 144 Ind. 363...

..225 139

85 Miller v. Burket, 132 Ind. 469 McClure v. Shelburne, etc.,

240 Co., 147 Ind. 119.

.502 | Miller v. Coulter, 156 Ind. 290 McCormick, etc., Co. y. Glid

166, 367, 488 den, 94 Ind. 447..... .....303 Miller v. Hart, 135 Ind. 201..651 McCullough v. Maryland, 4 Miller v. Rapp, 135 Ind. 614..296 Wheat. 316.

.562 Miller v. White, 50 N. Y. 137.422 McCullough v. Phenix Ins. Ming v. Woolfolk, 116 U. S. Co., 113 Mo. 606... .402 599

.419 McDermott v. State, 89 Ind. Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 187

..697
162

.562 McDonald v. Coryell, 134 Ind. Mitchell v. Brawley, 140 Ind. 193 .. .373 216

..667 McElrath v. United States, Mitchell v. Ringle, 151 Ind. 102 U. S. 426... .537 16

..599 McFadden v. Wilson, 96 Ind. Mobile County V. Kimball, 253 ...537 102 U. S. 691..

.556 McHarg v. Eastman, 35 How. Mode v. Beasley, 143 Ind. Pr. 205...

422 306

.343, 437, 438 McIntire v. State, 5 Blackf. Molihan v. State, 30 Ind. 266 384 ..273

698 MeKee v. Root, 153 Ind. 314 Monnett v. Turpie, 132 Ind. 225, 299 482

..240 McKinney v. Carroll, 21 Ky. Montgomery Webb Co. 96

.536 Dienelt, 133 Pa. St. 585....541 McLaughlin v. Citizens, etc., Moore v. Boyd, 95 Ind. 134. .329

Assn., 62 Ind. 264.... ..555 Moore v. Gary, 149 Ind. 51.. 74 McMakin v. Schenck, 98 Ind. Moore v. Hewitt, 147 Ind. 464 264 321, 323

577 Mead v. Burk, 156 Ind. 577.. 81 Moore v. Mayfield, 47 Ill. 167 Meagher v. Driscoll, 99 Mass.

459 281

.606 Moore v. Moore, 47 N. Y. 467.542 Meikel v. Borders, 129 Ind. Moore v. Quirk, 105 Mass. 49 529 .677

542 Mellon v. Coffelt, 59 Ind. 310 Moore v. Smock, 6 Ind. 392..447

542 Moran v. LeBlanc, 6 La. Ann. Memphis, etc., Co. v. Pikey, 113

..295 142 Ind. 304..

.672 Morrison v. Insurance Co., 69 Mercer v. Herbert, 41 Ind. Texas 353.

.463 459

.303 Morton v. Noble, 22 Ind. 160.567 Merchants Bank v. Bliss, 35 Motz v. City of Detroit, 18 N. Y. 412...

.411
Mich. 494..

.210 Merchants Bank v. Pennsyl Moulder v. Kempff, 115 Ind. vania, 167 U. S. 461.. .558 459

.698 Meredith v. Ewing, 85 Ind. Moulton v. Smith, 16 R. I. 410 .296 126

..645

v.

243

Mount v. State, ex rel., 90 O’Boyle v. Thomas, 116 Ind. Ind. 29..... .129, 437

75 Mulvane v. Rude, 146 Ind. Ockendon v. Barnes, 43 Iowa 476

. 74, 75
615

99 Munn v. People, 94 U. S. 113.519 O'Donahue v. Creager, 117 Murray v. Lylburn, 2 John. Ind. 372.

.363 Ch. 441.....

.237 | Officer v. Young, 5 Yerg. Musier V. Trumpbour, 5 (Tenn.) 320.

...572 Wend. 274.,

.295 Ogden v. Saunders, 12 Wheat. Myers v. Gibson, 147 Ind. 452 213

.562 473 Ohio, etc., R. Co. V. TrowMyers v. Gibson, 152 Ind. 500 bridge, 126 Ind. 391. .663

473 Ohio Life Ins. Co. v. Debolt,

16 How. 415.... .535, 536 Nading v. Elliott, 137 Ind.

Olcott V. Supervisors, 16 261

74
Wall. 678..

...536 Narramore v. Cleveland, etc.,

Oldfield' v. Eulert, 148 III. 614 R. Co., 96 Fed. 298....... .618

322 Nashville, etc., R. Co. v. Tay Oleson v. Lake Shore, etc., R. lor, 86 Fed. 168.

.522

Co., 143 Ind. 405.... .499 Nathan v. Lee, 152 Ind. 232

O'Mara v. Wabash R. Co., 30 150 Ind. 648.

...502 National Benefit Assn. v.

Orr v. Baker, 4 Ind. 86. ...641 Grauman, 107 Ind. 288....507 Orr v. Worden, 10 Ind. 553..360 National, etc., Assn. v. Hunt

Osborne v. Sutton, 108 Ind. singer, 150 Ind. 702. .502

443

..337 Neidefer v. Chastain, 71 Ind.

Osgood v. Smock, 144 Ind. 363

.330
387

...373 Neil v. Neil, 38 Ohio St. 558.632 Ott v. Rape, 24 Wis. 336. ...320 Neilson v. Churchill, 35 Ky.

Owen v. Dresback, 154 Ind. 333

.536

392 Neptune v. Tyler, 15 Ind.

Owen v. State, 52 Ind. 379... 57 App. 132...

.645 Newcum v. Kirtley, 13 B. Pacific Express Co. v. SeiMon. 515..

.459 bert, 142 U. S. 339. ...557 Newell v. Whitcher, 53 Vt. Page v. Allen, 58 Pa. St. 338 589 ..605

132 Newton V. Commissioners, Page v. Hardin, 8 B. Mon. 100 U. S. 548.... . 154 648

.257 Nichol v. Thomas, 53 Ind. 42.627 Palmer V. Chicago, etc., R. Nicholson v. Caress, 59 Ind. Co., 112 Ind. 250.... .277 39

86 Palmerton v. Hoop, 131 Ind. Niles v. Dodge, 70 Ind. 147..419 23

99 Noble v. McGinnis, 55 Ind. Parker v. Pennsylvania Co., 528 .290 134 Ind. 673.

.70, 277 Noerr v. Schmidt, 151 Ind. Parker v. State, ex rel., 132 579 ...61, 674 Ind. 419...

.129, 358 Nolte v. Libbert, 34 Ind. 163.449 Parker v. State, 136 Ind. 284.699 Norris v. Pilmore, 1 Yeates Parmeter v. Bourne, 8 Wash. (Pa.) 405... .422 45

154 North v. Davisson, 157 Ind. Pasley v. Freeman, 2 Smith's 610 .226 L. C. 166..

.419 Northwestern, etc., Ins. Co. Pattison v. Vaughn, 40 Ind. V. Hazelett, 105 Ind. 212

253

...310 303, 507 Pearce y. Dill, 149 Ind. 136..296 Norwood v. Baker, 172 U. S. Peck V. Houghtaling, 35 269

Mich. 127....

.390 Nutter V. Hawkins, 93 Ind. Peck v. State, 137 N. Y. 372..537 260

..318

.225

94

Peery v. Greensburgh, etc., People's, etc., Assn. V. ReyCo., 43 Ind. 321.....

92 nolds, 17 Ind. App. 453....542 Pence v. Armstrong, 95 Ind. Perkins v.

Hayward, 132 Ind. 191 ...677 95

..163 Pennsylvania Co. v. Ebaugh, Pettis v. Johnson, 56 Ind. 139 144 Ind. 687. .206

222 Pennsylvania Co. y. Ebaugh, Phenix Ins. Co. v. Carnahan, 152 Ind. 531.. .360 63 Ohio St. 258..

.401 Pennsylvania Co. v. Holder- Phenix Ins. Co. y. Pickel, 119 man, 69 Ind. 18. 92 Ind. 155...

507 Pennsylvania Co. v. Smith, Pickering v. State, 106 Ind. 98 Ind. 42..... .278, 663, 664 228

.163 Pennsylvania Co. v. Stanley, Piedmont, etc., Ins. Co. v.

10 Ind. App. 421... 222 Ewing, 92 U. S. 377.. ..507 Pennsylvania Co. v. State, Pierce v. Fitzhugh, 12 How. 142 Ind. 428. .437 443

..562 Pennsylvania Co. v. Whit- Pistorius' Appeal, 53 Mich. lock, 99 Ind. 16.. .424 350

..646 Pensoneau v. Pulliam, 47 Ill. Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. 58

.321 Backus, 133 Ind. 625..550, 558 People v. Albertson, 55 N. Y. Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. 50

.132 Fraze, 150 Ind. 576... ..499 People v. Barker, 155 N. Y. Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. In330

.579 diana Horseshoe Co., 154 People v. Common Council,

Ind. 322...

.184, 424 28 Mich. 228.

...132 Pittsburgh, etc., R. Oo. v. People, ex rel., v. Dutchess, Lightcap, 7 Ind. App. 249..670 etc., R. Co., 58 N. Y. 152 Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v.

193, 194, 195 Machler, 158 Ind. 159......367 People v. Fire Commission- Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. V.

ers, 72 N. Y. 445......254, 257 Martin, 82 Ind. 476. ...663, 664 People v. Fire Commission- Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. ers, 73 N. Y. 437.

.254 Moore, 152 Ind. 345... .205 People v. Fitz Gerald, 41 Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. Mich. 2.

.458 Noftsger, 148 Ind. 101. ....222 People v. Hill, 7 Cal. 97.265, 2661.tsburgh, etc., R. Co. V. People v. Howland, 155 N.Y. Ruby, 38 Ind. 294.

.514 270.

.140 Popijoy v. Miller, 133 Ind. People v. Johnston, 6 Cal. 673 19

10 357, 358 Portland Natural Gas, etc., People v. Loeffler, 175 Ill. 585 Co. v. State, ex rel., 135 263 Ind. 54.,

..519 People v. Lynch, 51 Cal. 15..132 Poundstone v. Baldwin, 145 People v. Murray, 5 Hill 468.536 Ind. 139..

.164 People v. New York, etc., R. Power's Appeal, 63 Pa. St. Co., 74 N. Y. 302.... .194 443

86 People v. Northern, etc., R. Prather V. Zulauf, 38 Ind. Co., 164 N. Y. 289.... ...194

155

...542 People v. Porter, 90 N. Y. 68 Price v. Hopkins, 13 Mich. 132, 140 318

.357 People v. Ribolsi, 89 Cal. Pritchard y. Norton, 106 U. 492 58 S. 124.

32 People, ex rel., v. Robb, 126 Purviance v. Drover, 20 Ind. N. Y. 180... 263 238

.447 People v. Supervisors, 17 N. Y. 235..

428 Quill v. City of Indianapolis, People, ex rel., v. Union Pa

124 Ind. 292.....

...527 cific R. Co., 20 Col. 186. .. .193 Quinlan v. Provident, etc.,

Ins. Co., 133 N. Y. 356.....463 .129 Schriedley v. State, 23 Ohio Rodenbarger v. Bramblett, St. 130.

Rademacher Greenwich Rollet v. Heiman, 120 Ind. Ins. Co., 75 Hun 83. .401

511

.240 Ragsdale v. Parrish, 74 Ind. Rooker V. Parsley, 72 Ind. 191

.290 497

..175, 177, 182 Railway Co. v. Lewis, 89 Root v. Erdelmeyer, 37 Ind. Tenn. 235... 28 225

..172 Ramsey v. Ramsey, 121 Ind. Ross y. Davis, 97 Ind. 79. ...273 215

61 | Ross v. Misner, 3 Blackf. Rathbone v. Wirth, 150 N. Y. 362

...360 459

.132 Ross v. Ross, 135 Ind. 367. 74, 75 Reasoner v. Edmundson, 5 Ross v. Sutherland, 81 Ill. Ind. 393. .567 275

.319 Rector v. Shirk, 92 Ind. 31...323 Ross v. Thompson, 78 Ind. 90 Redden v. Baker, 86 Ind. 191

222 651 | Ross-Meehan, etc., Co. V. Redelsheimer V. Miller, 107 Southern, etc., Co., 72 Fed. Ind. 485... ..665 957

.229 Reed v. Broadbelt, 68 Ind. 91.303 Rowe v. Peabody, 102 Ind. Reed v. State, 141 Ind. 116.. 45 198

92 Reeves v. Grottendick, 131 Rownd v. State, 152 Ind. 39 Ind. 107... .211

195 Reynolds v. Howe, 51 Conn. Roy v. Rowe, 90 Ind. 54. 74 472

9 Runner v. Dwiggins, 147 Ind. Rice v. City of Evansville,

238

.413 108 Ind. 7.

.665 Runner v. Scott, 150 Ind. 441 Rice V. Manford, 110 Ind.

205, 271 596

.665 | Rusk v. Zuck, 147 Ind. 388... 74 Rice v. Ruddiman, 10 Mich. Russ V. Russ, 142 Ind. 471 125 .357

360, 478, 630 Richards v. Reeves, 149 Ind. Ryan v. Hurley, 119 Ind. 115. 92 427

.311 Salem Bedford Stone Co. v. Richardson v. Pate, 93 Ind. Hilt, 26 Ind. App. 543.. 91 423

.627 | Sammons V. Halloway, 21 Ridgeway v. Dearinger, 42 Mich. 162.

.542 Ind. 157 ..

.663 Sanders v. State, 85 Ind. 318.694 Riley v. State, 95 Ind. 446... 57 Sands v. Hatfield, 7 Ind. App. Rinard v. West, 92 Ind. 359..391

357

.211 Ringle v. First Nat. Bank, Savings Bank v. Johnson, 18 107 Ind. 425.

.318
Mont. 440 .....

.411 Rinkenberger v. Meyer, 155 Savings, etc., Society v. MultInd. 152 ..

.165 nomah County, 169 U. S. Rio Grande, etc., Co. v. Gil

421

..551, 552, 577 dersleeve, 174 U. S. 603.... 36 Schearer V. Harber, 36 Ind. Ritchie v. Shannon, 2 Rawle, 536

.182, 183 (Pa.) 196.

422 Schleuter v. Canatsy, 148 Ind. Robertson V. Robertson, 120 384

.380 Ind. 333...

.291 Schnurr v. Stults, 119 Ind. Robinson v. Bidwell, 22 Cal. 429

.373 379

.232 Schori v. Stephens, 62 Ind. Robinson v. Schenck, 102 Ind.

441

290 307

58 78 Ind. 213..

.599 Schroeder v. Young, 161 U. Rodgers v. Goodwin, 2 Mass. S. 334.

.323 475

.562 Schuffv. Ransom, 79 Ind. Rogers v. Winklespleck, 143 458

..627 Ind. 373...

76 Schulte V. Thompson, 15 Roll v. City of Indianapolis, Wall. 151.

..201 52 Ind. 547.

.242| Scobey v. Ross, 5 Ind. 446...483

« PreviousContinue »