Page images
PDF
EPUB

7. (1) Friction alters the temperature of the bodies rubbed together.

(2) The sun is supposed to move through space. (3) A ray of light passing into or out of a denser medium is deflected.

Point out the successive questions which would have to be decided in the investigation of the above phenomena.

8. Find some simple instances of the homogeneous and heterogeneous intermixture of effects, and of the methods of concomitant variations and residues.

9. Since 1842 there has been a great reform of the British tariff, and a great increase of British trade. Does this coincidence prove that the first circumstance is the cause of the second? 10. Supposing us to be unacquainted with the causes of the following phenomena, by what methods should we investigate each?

(1) The connection between the barometer and the weather.

(2) A person poisoned at a meal.

(3) The connection between the hands of a clock. (4) The effect of the Gulf-stream upon the climate of Great Britain.

LESSON XXX.-Empirical and Deductive Methods.

1. Define Empirical Law, and find a few additional instances of such laws.

2. What are the three steps of the Deductive Method? 3. Trace some of the successive steps in the progress

of the theory of gravitation, showing that it was established by this method.

LESSON XXXI.-Explanation, &c.

1. What do you mean by the explanation of a fact? 2. State the three ways in which a law of nature may be explained, and suggest some additional instances of each case.

3. Define tendency. Do all causes consist only of tendencies, or can you find examples to the contrary?

4. Give a definition of hypothesis. How may a valid be distinguished from an invalid hypothesis? 5. What place does hypothesis hold in the Deductive Method?

6. Explain the ambiguities of the words theory and fact.

LESSON XXXII.—Classification.

1. Define classification, and give the derivation of the word.

2. What do you mean by important characters in classification?

3. State Dr Whewell's criterion of a good natural arrangement.

4. Distinguish between a natural and artificial system of classification.

5. What do you mean by a characteristic quality? Is it always an important quality?

6. Define abstraction, generalization, and colligation of facts.

7. What are the characters of a notion properly abstracted?

LESSON XXXIII.-Requisites of a Philosophical

Language.

1. What are the three purposes for which we use language?

2. What are the two chief requisites of a philosophical language?

3. By what considerations should we be guided in choosing between a new and old scientific term? 4. Distinguish a Descriptive Terminology and a Nomenclature; separate the following terms according as they belong to one or the other :Rose, Rosaceæ, Rose-like, Potassium, Alkaloid, Ruminant Animal, Ruminating, Ruby, Ruby-red. 5. What does Mr Mill mean by the expression Natural Kind?

:

INDEX,

AND CONCISE VOCABULARY OF LOGICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL

TERMS.

Abacus, the logical, 199 Abscissio Infiniti (the cutting off of the infinite or negative part), the process by which we determine the position of an object in a system of classes, by successive comparison and rejection of those classes to which it does not belong.

Absolute terms, i.e. non-relative terms, 25 sometimes used as name of non-connotative terms, 41 Abstract terms, 20, 43 Abstraction, 285

Accent, fallacy of, 174 Accident, fallacy of, 176; the predicable, 103

Accidental definition is a definition which assigns the properties of a species, or the accidents of an individual; it is more commonly called a Description.

Acquired perceptions, 236 Added determinants, inference by, 86

Adequate knowledge, 56

A dicto secundum quid, &c.,
fallacy of, 176
Adjectives, 21
Adverbials, 93

Affirmative propositions, 63
Algebraic reasoning, 58, 219
Ambiguity of all, 20; of some, 79
of many old terms, 291; of terms in
Political Economy, 292
Ambiguous middle term, 130, 171
Amphibology, fallacy of, 172
Ampliative propositions, 69
Analogue, a thing analogous to
some other thing.
Analysis, method of, 205

Analogy, the cause of ambiguity, 35, 50; reasoning by, 226-8 Analytics, (тà "AvaλuTɩkà,) the title given in the second century to portions of the Organon, or Logical Treatises of Aristotle; they were distinguished as the Prior and Posterior Analytics.

Analytic syllogism, a syllogism in which the conclusion is placed first, the premises following as the reasons. See Synthetic Syllogism; the distinction is unimportant. Antecedent, of a hypothetical proposition, 160; of an event, 240 Anticipation of nature, 229 Antinomy (avr, against; vóμos, law), the opposition of one law or rule to another. Kant.

A posteriori knowledge, 208
A priori knowledge, 208
Arbor Porphyriana, see Tree of
Porphyry.

Argument, (Latin, argus, from apyòs, clear, manifest,) the process of reasoning, the shewing or proving that which is doubtful by that which is known. See Inference. The middle term of a syllogism is sometimes called specially the argument. Argumentum a fortiori, an argument in which we prove that the case in question is more strong or probable than one already conceded to be sufficiently so. Argumentum ad hominem,

178 Argumentum ad judicium, an appeal to the common sense of mankind.

Argumentum ad ignoranti-
am, an argument founded on the
ignorance of adversaries.
Argumentum ad populum,

179

Argumentum ad

verecun-

diam, an appeal to our respect for
some great authority.
Argumentum ex concesso,
a proof derived from a proposition
already conceded.

Aristotle's Dicta, 123
Art and Science, distinction of, 7
Artificial Classification, 284
Assertion, (ad, to; sero, to join,)
a statement or proposition, affirma-
tive or negative.

Association of ideas, (associo, to
accompany; socius, a companion,)
the natural connection existing in
the mind between impressions which
have previously coexisted, or which
are similar. Any idea tends to bring
into the mind its associated ideas, in
accordance with the two great laws
of association, the Law of Conti-
guity, and the Law of Similarity.
Assumption, (assumo, to take for
granted,) any proposition taken as
the basis of argument; in a special
sense, the minor premise of a cate-
gorical syllogism.

Attribute, (attribuo, to give or
ascribe to,) a quality or circumstance
which may be affirmed (or denied)
of a thing; opposed to Substance,
which see.

Attribute in grammar, 92
Attributive term, i. e. Connotative
term, 41

Axiom, defininition of, 125

Baconian method, 255; Philoso-
phy, 229

Barbara, Celarent, &c., 145
Begging the Question, 179
Belief, assent to a proposition, ad-
mitting of any degree of strength,
from the slightest probability to the
fullest certainty; see Probability.
Bentham, George, new system of
Logic, 187

Boole, George, his system of Logic,
191: his Laws of Thought, 197;
his logical works, 201

Canons of syllogism, 121-2; Hamil-

ton's supreme Canon, 189
Canons of Mill's Inductive Methods,
First, 240; Second, 242; Third, 245:
Fourth, 252; Fifth, 249
Categorematic words, 18
Categorical propositions, 63
Categories, the summa genera, or
most extensive classes into which
things can be distributed; they are
ten in number, as follows:

Ovoía, Substance; Ilogòv, Quan-
tity ; Ποῖον, Quality; Πρός τι, Re-
lation ; Ποιεῖν, Action; Πάσχειν,
Passion, or suffering; IIoù, Place;
Пóre, Time; Keiroat, Position;
"Exew, Habit or condition.

Everything which can be affirmed
must come under one or other of these
highest predicates, which were de-
scribed in the first treatise of Aris-
totle's Organon, called the Catego-
ries.

Cause, meaning of, 239

Aristotle distinguished four kinds
of causes for the existence of a thing
-1. The Material Cause, the sub-
stance or matter composing it; 2.
The Formal Cause, the pattern, type
or design, according to which it is
shaped; 3. The Efficient Cause, the
force employed in shaping it; 4.
The Final Cause, the end, motive
or purpose of the work.

Chance, ignorance of the causes
which are in action; see Probability.
Character, derivation of the word,
46

Characteristics, 285

Circulus in definiendo, 110, 114
Circulus in probando, 179
Clearness of knowledge, 54
Cognition, (cognosco, to know,)
knowledge, or the action of mind in
acquiring knowledge.

Colligation of Facts, Dr Whewell's
expression for the mental union of
facts by some suitable conception,
see 286

Collective terms, 19

Combined or complete method of
investigation, 258
Comparison, com, together; par,
equal or like,) the action of mind by
which we judge whether two objects

« PreviousContinue »