...very well with the following utterance, also meant to be decisive : " See, then, our predicament. We can think of matter only in terms of mind. We can think of mind only in terms of matter." — Principles of Psychology, vol. i, p. 627. Mr. Spencer adds that we can get values of y only in...

...we class as material — either our own bodies or surrounding things. See then our predicament. We can think of Matter only in terms of Mind. We can...and "when we have got the final answer of the second we are referred back to the first for an inter •pretation of it. We find the value of x in terms...

...we class as material — either our own bodies or surrounding things. See then our predicament. We can think of Matter only in terms of Mind. We can...and when we have got the final answer of the second we are referred back to the first for an interpretation of it. We find the value of a; in terms of...

...into so-called matter which latter is, indeed, wholly impossible." "See, then, our predicament. We can think of matter only in terms of mind. We can...and when we have got the final answer of the second, we are referred back to the first for an interpretation of it. We find the value of x in terms of y...

...yet no translation can carry us beyond our symbols." * And again : " See, then, our predicament. "We can think of Matter only in terms of Mind. We can...and, when we have got the final answer of the second, we are referred back to the first for an interpretation of it. We find the value of x in terms of y...

...yet no translation can carry us beyond our symbols." * And again : "See, then, our predicament. We can think of Matter only in terms of Mind. We can...and, when we have got the final answer of the second, we are referred back to the first for an interpretation of it. We find the value of x in terms of y...

...we class as material — either our own bodies or surrounding things. See then our predicament. We can think of Matter only in terms of Mind. We can...and when we have got the final answer of the second we are referred back to the first for an interpretation of it. We find the value of x in terms of y...

...we class as material — either our own bodies or surrounding things. See then our predicament. We can think of Matter only in terms of Mind. We can...referred to the second for a final answer ; and when wo have got the final answer of the second we are referred back to the first for an interpretation...

...an unknown and hypothetical cause of states of our own consciousness." Herbert Spencer says : " We can think of matter only in terms of mind. We can think of mind only in terms of matter. The antithesis of subject and object, never to be transcended while consciousness lasts, renders impossible...

...yet no translation can carry us beyond our symbols." * And again: , " See, then, our predicament. "We can think of Matter only in terms of Mind. We can think of Miud only in terms of Matter. "When we have pushed our explorations of the first to the uttermost limit,...