Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Volume 106 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 62
Page 8
... , to Galbraith & Maloney , of Knoxville . With this note was also delivered to them the collateral in question . Hav- ing received these assets , on the 7th of March , A.M. , Moses , Exr .. v . Grainger . 8 KNOXVILLE :
... , to Galbraith & Maloney , of Knoxville . With this note was also delivered to them the collateral in question . Hav- ing received these assets , on the 7th of March , A.M. , Moses , Exr .. v . Grainger . 8 KNOXVILLE :
Page 45
... received no part of the $ 25,000 should stand as high as the bondsmen furnishing the money ; that each holder of bonds issued is only secured under the mortgage in the proportion that his bonds bear to the whole amount authorized to be ...
... received no part of the $ 25,000 should stand as high as the bondsmen furnishing the money ; that each holder of bonds issued is only secured under the mortgage in the proportion that his bonds bear to the whole amount authorized to be ...
Page 89
... received and paid for in full . That Court further reports that while the work was not done in strict compliance with the specifications in the particulars mentioned , there was no fraud or concealment on the part of the contractors ...
... received and paid for in full . That Court further reports that while the work was not done in strict compliance with the specifications in the particulars mentioned , there was no fraud or concealment on the part of the contractors ...
Page 105
... received her deed and took possession in 1885 , but as to the equity for one note when it ma- tured in in 1886 , and as to the equity for for the other note when it matured in 1887. Therefore , the possession that Mrs. Rawlings acquired ...
... received her deed and took possession in 1885 , but as to the equity for one note when it ma- tured in in 1886 , and as to the equity for for the other note when it matured in 1887. Therefore , the possession that Mrs. Rawlings acquired ...
Page 110
... received these deeds from the land company they had negotiated a sale of the lots to one Selden Langley at a profit of $ 1,000 , which was paid in cash . Langley also made , it appears , the cash payments to the land company due from ...
... received these deeds from the land company they had negotiated a sale of the lots to one Selden Langley at a profit of $ 1,000 , which was paid in cash . Langley also made , it appears , the cash payments to the land company due from ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
95 Tenn action affirmed agent alleged amount answer Appeal from Chancery Appeal in error application appraisal assigned authority averred Bank bill of exceptions bonds cars cause certificate Chancellor Chancery Appeals Chancery Court charge charter Cheatham County Circuit Court cited clause Coal Creek complainant contract corporation Court of Chancery Court of Equity Cusack Davidson County debt decree deed defendant company defendant's demurrer Dickson County dismissed districts equity error from Circuit evidence fact fee simple fendant Fentress County filed Gernt Heis held injury Insurance Co insurance companies issue judgment jurisdiction jury land lease liability lien Manard matter ment mortgage Nashville opinion paid pany parties payment person Pickle plaintiff pleadings Post premiums proof purchase question Railroad res adjudicata rule statute street suit Sullivan County Tennessee Coal tion track trial Judge trust Turnpike Turnpike Co usury verdict wife
Popular passages
Page 565 - This company shall not be liable beyond the actual cash value of the property at the time any loss or damage occurs, and the loss or damage shall be ascertained or estimated according to such actual cash value, with proper deduction for depreciation however caused, and shall in no event exceed what it would then cost the insured to repair or replace the same with material of like kind and quality...
Page 568 - No suit or action on this policy, for the recovery of any claim, shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity until after full compliance by the insured with all the foregoing requirements, nor unless commenced within twelve months next after the fire.
Page 556 - This company shall not be held to have waived any provision or condition of this policy or any forfeiture thereof by any requirement, act, or proceeding: on its part relating to the appraisal or to any examination herein provided for ; and the loss shall not become payable until sixty days after the notice, ascertainment, estimate, and satisfactory proof of the loss herein required have been received by this company, including an award by appraisers when appraisal has been required.
Page 527 - This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void if the insured now has or shall hereafter make or procure any other contract of insurance, whether valid or not, on property covered in whole or in part by this policy...
Page 475 - If the INTEREST of the assured in the property be any other than the entire, unconditional and sole ownership of the property for the use and benefit of the assured...
Page 566 - ... the sum for which this company is liable pursuant to this policy shall be payable sixty days after due notice, ascertainment, estimate, and satisfactory proof of the loss have been received by this company in accordance with the terms of this policy.
Page 473 - ... if the interest of the insured be other than unconditional and sole ownership; or if the subject of insurance be a building on ground not owned by the insured in fee simple...
Page 535 - It is merely stated that the owners allowed all persons who chose to do so, for recreation or for business, to go upon the waste without complaint; that they were not churlish enough to interfere with any person who went there. He must take the permission with Its concomitant conditions, and, it may be, perils.
Page 633 - Craig. in this State while such default or disability continues, nor until its authority to do business is restored by the Insurance Commissioner; Provided, however, that unless the ground for revocation or suspension relates only to the financial condition or soundness of the company, or to a deficiency in its assets...
Page 535 - The proprietors of the soil held out an allurement whereby the plaintiff was induced to come upon the place in question: they held out this road to all persons having occasion to proceed to the asylum as the means of access thereto. Could they have justified the placing an obstruction across the way, whereby an injury was occasioned to one using the way by their invitation? Clearly they could not.