of the Roman Catholic faith, iii. 470 sub. not. u; his project of union with the Gallican church grossly misrepre- sented by Dr. Mosheim, who from hence forms an unjust judgment of the spirit of the church of England, iv. 293 r; his opinions concerning dissen- ters from episcopacy, 206 u; forms a project of union between the English and Gallican churches; and on what conditions, ibid. 207; assists Father Courayer in his defence of the validity of English ordinations, and with what views, 207 w; a circumstantial account of the correspondence carried on be- tween him and certain French doctors, relative to the union, iv. 226; defends the Protestant cause against Bossuet, with encomiums on him, ibid. is accused by the author of the Confessional, and upon what foundation, ibid. Kiornin- gius's account of his correspondence with the French doctors, whence Dr. Mosheim formed his notions of it, what, and egregiously erroneous, ibid. e; three circumstances or conclusions drawn from authentic papers relative to this correspondence in defence of Dr. Wake, iv. 228, 229; the contents of his first letter to Mr. Beauvoir, by which he is cleared from the imputation of being the first mover in this project of union, 229; observations on the answer to it, wherein the first overtures of the above-mentioned project are expressed, ibid. f, 230, writes another letter to Mr. Beauvoir, and makes handsome mention of Dr. Du Pin, ibid. the author of the Confessional's suspicion hereupon and proved groundless, ibid. h; other objec- tions in the Confessional, particularly the supposed concessions by the Archbi- shop answered, 231 sub. not. h;_he re- ceives a letter of thanks from Dr. Du Pin, who intimates his desire of a union between the English and Gallican churches, 230, 232; his answer to Dr. Du Pin, expressing his readiness to concur in such a union, and remarks thereon, 232; observations on a remarkable dis- course delivered in the Sorbonne, rela- tive to the project of union, and by whom, 233; his answer to Du Pin com- municated to the Cardinal Noailles, who greatly admired it, 234; receives a se- cond letter from Du Pin, and a copy of Girardin's discourse, with his ill opinion of the progress of the union, ibid. the Sorbonne doctors form a plan of recon- ciliation, with the uncertainty of their motives, ibid. is informed of Du Pin's making an essay toward the union, and that his letters were highly approved, with observations on the Protestant spi- rit, which reigns in them, ibid. his re- markable expression on the necessity of the concurrence of the state in the pro-
jected union, 235; receives Du Pin's Commonitorium, ibid. the contents of which are reduced to three heads, and what those are, with a compendious ac- count of it, ibid. 236; an observation of Du Pin, how the union may be com- pleted without the Pope's consent or consulting him, and his admonition con- cerning it, 239 and m; rejects the Com- monitorium, refuses to comply with its proposals, and observes upon what terms a union must be effected, 240; com- mends the candour and openness in the Commonitorium, he refuses giving his sentiments at large concerning it, 241; his principal views in this correspond- ence, with a defence of his conduct re- lative to the Commonitorium, ibid. his sentiments on the primacy of the Bishop of Rome, 242; his project of union ex- plained, ibid. his hopes of the Gallican church's separation from that of Rome, and whence, 243; weighty obstacles to this separation, ibid. defence of the se- crecy observed in this correspondence, 244 and y; the correspondence divulged and the consequence, ibid. and a; is in- formed thereof by Mr. Beauvoir; the correspondence is suspended, with his doubtful sentiments about the event, ibid. his letter to Du Pin, who dies be- fore the receipt of it, regretting the ill success of the projected union, ibid. writes to Mr. Beauvoir, before he had heard of Du Pin's death, on the same subject, and expresses his hopes of re- newing their good design, ibid. observa- tions on Du Pin's account of this cor- respondence left behind him, which seemed to intimate that the Archbishop was the first mover in this project of union, 246; and the promise of the former to rectify it, who was prevented by death from doing it, ibid. a faint cor- respondence carried on with Girardin, but without success, ibid. impartial con- clusions drawn from the preceding ac- count of the correspondence, ibid. his charitable correspondence with the Pro- testant churches abroad, 247; his letter to Le Clerc, expressing his affections for them, and desire of their union with the church of England, ib. his exhorta- tory letter to the pastors and professors of Geneva, and account of, 248; letters to Professor Schurer of Berne, and Turretin of Geneva, full of moderation and charity, ibid. remarkable letter, to M. Jablonski of Poland, with the two questions proposed by the latter, that occasioned this letter, ibid. 249; ac- count of his conduct with relation to the Dissenters, and defence, ibid. makes no attempts to unite them to the church of England, with the reasons, ibid. his change of conduct with respect to them whom he at first defended, and after-
ward opposed, partly accounted for, 250; this sufficiently vindicated, and by whom, ibid. his great character, as drawn from the preceding accounts of his charitable correspondence with dif- ferent Christian churches, and the de- claration of a learned divine concerning him, 251 and i; authentic copies of the original letters relative to his correspon- dence with the French doctors, 252, 271; extract of his letter to Mr. Le Clerc, 272, his letter to the pastors and professors of Geneva, 273; to Professor Schurer, 276, 278; to Professor Turre- tin, ibid. to Mr. Jablonski, 280. Waldeck, Count, retakes Munster from the fanatics, and puts their king to death, iii. 330.
Waldemar I. King of Denmark, his zeal for propagating Christianity in xii cent. ii. 228; conversions among the Sclavo- nians and the Isle of Rugen by his arms, and the ministry of Absalom of Lunden, ibid. and b.
Waldenses, their origin in xii cent. various
names and history, ii. 314, 315, amaz- ing success owing to the innocence of their lives, 315; distinguished from the Inhabitants of Piedmont, 316 g; their doctrine, discipline, and views, 316, 317, formed into a sect, not through a spirit of opposition, but intention to restore primitive piety, 318 i; adopt the three orders of Bishops, Priests, and Dea- cons, in church discipline, ibid. and k; think it necessary these persons should exactly resemble the apostles of Christ, ibid. and ; their laity divided into two classes, and different sentiments among them concerning the Romish church, and the possession of worldly goods, ibid. and 319 m; increase in xiv cent. 489; their state and settle- ment in xv cent. 563; account of their reformation in xvi cent. iii. 398; perse- cuted by the Dukes of Savoy in xvii cent. iv. 70 and t.
Walenburg, two polemic divines of this name in the Romish church in xvii cent. unfair in managing controversies, iii. 473 and e.
Wallis, contributes to the progress of na- tural knowledge, iii. 446. Walter, head of the Beghards in xiv cent.
his fate and character, ii. 501 and e. Wansleb, John Michael, is sent upon the mission to Abyssinia, by Ernest of Saxe Gotha, in xvii cent. iii. 561; neglects, his mission, ibid. turns Romanist, and enters the Dominican order, with the reason, ibid. and x.
Warner, Dr. character of his Ecclesiasti- cal History, i. 462 e. Wars, holy, the first plan laid for them in x cent. ii. 82; and renewed in xi cent. 122; the first of them began at the soli- citations of Peter the Hermit, and Pope
Urban II. and its progress, 122, 123 why called Crusades, 124; history of the first, ibid. the melancholy conse quences arising from them, and their legality examined, 128 and z, 129, 130 and a, b; their unhappy effects on reli- gion, ibid. 131, 132 and f,g; the un- fortunate issue of the second of them, ii. 236; and cause, ibid. history of the third, 237, 238; promoted by the Popes, and why, 324; attempts to renew them in xiv cent. unsuccessful, 441. Warsaw, terrible law against the Socinians here, and how executed, iv. 170. Waterland, Dr. opposes Dr. Clarke's sen- timents concerning the Trinity, iv. 212; sub. not. z; censured as a Semitritheist, and whence, ibid.
Waterlandians, a sect of Anabaptists in xvi cent. iii. 337 and y; draw up and lay before the public a summary of their doctrine, 339; their respect for learn- ing, 356; abandon the severe discipline and opinions of Menno, iv. 166; divided into two sects with their names, ibid. account of their ecclesiastical govern- ment, ibid.
Wayen, John Vander, flaming dissension between him and Frederic Spanheim,
with the occasion, iv. 114.
Weller, opposes Callixtus in xvii cent iv. 32. Wertheim Translation of the Bible, and di-
visions occasioned by it, iv. 201 and m. Wesselus, John, called the light of the world from his extraordinary genius and penetration, ii. 549; censured the Ro- mish church with freedom and candour in xv cent. ibid.
Westphal, Joachim, renews the controver sy on the Eucharist, and how he con-
ducted it, iii. 269 and h; is answered by Calvin, 270; the consequences, ibid. Westphalia, involved in calamities by the fanatics in xvi cent. iii. 231; famous peace of, 460.
Whiston, William, defends the doctrine of the Arians in xviii cent. iv. 210 and z; is opposed and treated with severity, and censure on this account, 211, sub.
Whitby, Dr. account of his dissertation on the manner of interpreting the Scrip- tures, iv. 74 y.
White, Thomas, his notions and works, iii. 547 and t; doctrine condemned at Rome, ibid. and embraced by some, ibid. Whitefield, George, his ministerial labours and great views, iv. 207, 208; his doc- trine seems reducible to two proposi- tions, and what these are, ibid. Whitehead, a famous writer among the Quakers, iv. 154, sub. not. b. Wickliff, John, a violent opposer of the Mendicants in xiv cent. ii. 468; attacks the monks and papal authority, ibid. re- futes many absurd and superstitious no- tions in his times, ibid. exhorts the pec-
ple to the study of the Scriptures, and gives a free translation of them, ibid. his adversaries, who, ibid. 469; opinions condemned, partly as heretical, partly as erroneous, 469 and g; dies peacea- bly, and by what means he escaped un- punished uncertain, ibid. and h; leaves many followers who are persecuted by the inquisition, ibid. 470; his writings and ashes committed to the flames by the council of Constance, 529. Wigelius, Lutheran Doctor, goes over to the Paracelsists, iii. 222.
Valentine, his writings censured
as erroneous, iv. 58. Wilhelmina, her extravagant notions, and what these are, ii. 436; is admired, ib.
a sect founded to support her tenets, is crushed by the inquisition, 437 and f. William the Conqueror, a great patron of learning, ii. 137; rejects the Pope's or- der of submission to the See of Rome, 162 and f.
Prince of Orange, procures a toleration for the Mennonites, iii. 347. III. king of England, enriches the society for propagating the Christian re- ligion in foreign parts, iii. 411 and ƒ; his act of toleration in favour of the Nonconformists, iv. 110; deprives San- croft and seven other Bishops of their Sees, for refusing the oath of allegiance to him, and the event, 111 and ii and iii. Willebrord, an Anglo Saxon, his zeal in propagating Christianity in vii cent. i. 441; is accompanied by others in this undertaking, ibid. his own and the mo- tives of his followers in this design ex- amined, 442.
Wirekir, Nigel, an English bard, his satire upon the Monks, ii. 273 d.
Wisnovius, Stanislaus, follows Farnovius in his schism, iii. 382.
Witnesses of the Truth, those so called who attempted a reformation in ix cent. ii. 196; their laudable opposition against the superstition of the church more ve- hement than prudent, 17; errors con- sequent on their ill-grounded notions, ibid. Wittemberg, tumult raised there by Caro- lostadt, iii. 232 and g; but appeased by Luther, ibid. magistrates of, banish Hu- ber, and for what, 259.
Wlodomir, first Christian duke of Russia, ii. 76; a high saint among the Russians, but not acknowledged as such by the Latins, ibid.
Wolf, his philosophy and that of Leibnitz detrimental to Arminianism, and how, iv. 144, ee; applied to the illustration of the Scriptures by some German di- vines, ibid. sub ee; reduces the science of Metaphysics to a scientific order, and brings it to great perfection, 200. Worms, diet held there in xii cent. con- cerning investitures, ii. 262; conditions VOL. IV.
made relative to this dispute, ibid. the edict passed against Luther at a diet held in xvi cent. and disapproved, iii. 44, r.
Worship, public, its form in iv cent. i. 303, 304 and s; its variety of liturgies, whence, ibid. changes introduced into many of its parts, ibid. consisted in little more than a pompous round of external ceremonies in xvi cent. iii. 22; wretch- ed sermons, and common-place sub- jects, ibid. with the true cause of the people's ignorance, superstition, and corruption of manners, 23; hence a re- formation in the church ardently de- sired, and how far, ibid.
Writers, Greek, chief in iii cent. i. 212.
iv cent. 276. V cent. 354. vi cent. 416. vii cent. 455. viii cent. 506. ix cent. ii. 29.
x cent. 103. xi cent. 193. xii cent. 281. xiii cent. 398.
xiv cent. 487.
XV cent. 547.
Latin, in iii cent. i. 213. iv cent. 278. V cent. 355. vi cent. 417. vii cent. 456. viii cent. 507.
ix cent. ii. 30.
x cent. 104. xi cent. 193. xii cent. 281.
Xavier, Francis, his character, iii. 117 and f; his zeal and success in propagating the Gospel in India and Japan, ibid. is sainted by Urban VIII. in xvii cent. iii. 549.
Xenaias, of Hierapolis, his hypothesis concerning the body of Christ, i. 437; and adopted by the Abyssinians, iii. 191. Ximenius, Rodericus, an eminent historian in xiii cent. ii. 340.
Xunchi, Chinese Emperor, his death re- tards for a time the progress of Chris- tianity in China, iii. 396.
Zachary, Pope, deposes Childeric III. king of France, and gives his kingdom to Pepin, i. 495, 496 and q.
Zanchius, Jerome, revives the controversy concerning, predestination at Strasburg, iii. 271; attached to the sentiments of Calvin, ibid.
Zealand, clergy and magistrates of, oppose the toleration of the Mennonites, iii. 347.
Zeno, the Emperor, publishes his Henoti- con for reconciliation in v cent. i. 388; the reception it met with, various, ibid. Zigabenus, Euthymius, his character and works, ii. 281 and z; commentaries, 289; Panoplia, in which he attacks all the various sects of Heresies, 298. Zinzendorf, Count, founds the sect of the Herrenhutters in xviii cent. iv. 198; his pernicious notions, and their bad conse- quence to Christian morality, 199 sub. not. l.
Ziska, the famous head of the Hussites in
xv cent. ii. 552; though blind, discovers in his conduct great intrepidity tempered with prudence, ibid. Zonaras, John, his character, ii. 246; works, 281.
Zosimus, account of his history, in which he reviles the Christians, and loads them with unjust reproaches, in v cent. 341.
Pope, first protects, and then
condemns Pelagius and Coelestine, 393 and d.
Zuingle, Ulric, begins the Reformation in Switzerland, iii. 38; his great charac ter and zeal for the Reformation, 39 and i, k; if inferior to Luther, ibid. ; his resolution and success against Sam- son the monk, ibid. gets the Pope's supremacy denied in Switzerland, 40; his blemishes considered, ibid. his doc- trine of the Eucharist, 50, and iii. 274; which is embraced in Switzerland, 50 and a; clears himself from accusations of heresy to the satisfaction of Luther, 59; is founder of the Reformed church, and his character, 264; aimed at sim- plicity of worship, but perhaps went too far, 265 and t; differed from Luther in several points, ibid. and controversy with him about the eucharist, ibid. his example followed by Ecolampadius, and both opposed by Luther, 266; con- ference between him and Luther, and other doctors, at Marpurg, and truce consented to, ibid. falls in battle, 266; censure of the Lutherans here, 267 and a; his doctrine and discipline corrected by Calvin in three points, 276; expo- sition of part of the New Testament, 310 and k; book about true and false religion, 311.
Zurich, doctrine of Carolostadt propagated
there in xvi cent. iii. 233; war between the protestants of this place and the Roman Catholies, 266; church esta blished here obstinately maintained Zo- ingle's doctrine of the Eucharist, and opposed Calvin's notions of predestina tion, 279.
« PreviousContinue » |