Page images
PDF
EPUB

7. (1) Friction alters the temperature of the bodies rubbed together.

(2) The sun is supposed to move through space. (3) A ray of light passing into or out of a denser medium is deflected.

Point out the successive questions which would have to be decided in the investigation of the above phenomena.

8. Find some simple instances of the homogeneous and heterogeneous intermixture of effects, and of the methods of concomitant variations and residues.

9. Since 1842 there has been a great reform of the British tariff, and a great increase of British trade. Does this coincidence prove that the first circumstance is the cause of the second? to. Supposing us to be unacquainted with the causes of the following phenomena, by what methods should we investigate each?

(1) The connection between the barometer and the weather.

(2) A person poisoned at a meal.

(3) The connection between the hands of a clock. (4) The effect of the Gulf-stream upon the climate of Great Britain.

LESSON XXX.-Empirical and Deductive Methods.

1. Define Empirical Law, and find a few additional instances of such laws.

2. What are the three steps of the Deductive Method? 3. Trace some of the successive steps in the progress

of the theory of gravitation, showing that it was established by this method.

LESSON XXXI.-Explanation, &c.

1. What do you mean by the explanation of a fact? 2. State the three ways in which a law of nature may be explained, and suggest some additional instances of each case.

3. Define tendency. Do all causes consist only of tendencies, or can you find examples to the contrary?

4. Give a definition of hypothesis. How may a valid be distinguished from an invalid hypothesis? 5. What place does hypothesis hold in the Deductive Method?

6. Explain the ambiguities of the words theory and fact.

LESSON XXXII.-Classification.

1. Define classification, and give the derivation of the word.

2. What do you mean by important characters in classification?

3. State Dr Whewell's criterion of a good natural arrangement.

4. Distinguish between a natural and artificial system of classification.

5. What do you mean by a characteristic quality? Is it always an important quality ?

6. Define abstraction, generalization, and colligation of facts.

7. What are the characters of a notion properly abstracted?

LESSON XXXIII.-Requisites of a Philosophical

Language.

1. What are the three purposes for which we use language?

2. What are the two chief requisites of a philosophical language?

3. By what considerations should we be guided in choosing between a new and old scientific term? 4. Distinguish a Descriptive Terminology and a Nomenclature; separate the following terms according as they belong to one or the other :

Rose, Rosaceæ, Rose-like, Potassium, Alkaloid, Ruminant Animal, Ruminating, Ruby, Ruby-red. 5. What does Mr Mill mean by the expression Natural Kind?

INDEX,

AND CONCISE VOCABULARY OF LOGICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL

TERMS.

Abacus, the logical, 199
Abscissio Infiniti (the cutting
off of the infinite or negative part),
the process by which we determine
the position of an object in a system
of classes, by successive comparison
and rejection of those classes to which
it does not belong.

Absolute terms, i.e. non-relative
terms, 25; sometimes used as name
of non-connotative terms, 41
Abstract terms, 20, 43
Abstraction, 285
Accent, fallacy of, 174
Accident, fallacy of, 176; the pre-
dicable, 103

Accidental definition is a defi-
nition which assigns the properties
of a species, or the accidents of an
individual; it is more commonly
called a Description.

Acquired perceptions, 236
Added determinants, inference
by, 86

Adequate knowledge, 56

A dicto secundum quid, &c.,
fallacy of, 176
Adjectives, 21
Adverbials, 93

Affirmative propositions, 63
Algebraic reasoning, 58, 219
Ambiguity of all, 20; of some, 79
of many old terms, 291; of terms in
Political Economy, 292
Ambiguous middle term, 130, 171
Amphibology, fallacy of, 172
Ampliative propositions, 69
Analogue, a thing analogous to
some other thing.
Analysis, method of, 205

Analogy, the cause of ambiguity,
35, 50; reasoning by, 226-8
Analytics, (Ta AvaλvTika,) the title
given in the second century to por-
tions of the Organon, or Logical
Treatises of Aristotle; they were
distinguished as the Prior and Pos-
terior Analytics.

Analytic syllogism, a syllogism
in which the conclusion is placed
first, the premises following as the
reasons. See Synthetic Syllogism;
the distinction is unimportant.
Antecedent, of a hypothetical pro-
position, 160; of an event, 240
Anticipation of nature, 229
Antinomy (avri, against; vóμos,
law), the opposition of one law or rule
to another. Kant.

A posteriori knowledge, 208
A priori knowledge, 208
Arbor Porphyriana, see Tree of
Porphyry.

Argument, (Latin, argus, from
dpyòs, clear, manifest,) the process of
reasoning, the shewing or proving
that which is doubtful by that which
is known. See Inference. The mid-
dle term of a syllogism is sometimes
called specially the argument.
Argumentum a fortiori, an
argument in which we prove that
the case in question is more strong
or probable than one already con-
ceded to be sufficiently so.
Argumentum ad hominem,

178
Argumentum ad judicium,
an appeal to the common sense of
mankind.

Argumentum ad ignorantiam, an argument founded on the ignorance of adversaries. Argumentum ad populum,

179

Argumentum ad verecundiam, an appeal to our respect for some great authority. Argumentum ex concesso, a proof derived from a proposition already conceded.

Aristotle's Dicta, 123 Art and Science, distinction of, 7 Artificial Classification, 284 Assertion, (ad, to; sero, to join,) a statement or proposition, affirmative or negative. Association of ideas, (associo, to accompany; socius, a companion,) the natural connection existing in the mind between impressions which have previously coexisted, or which are similar. Any idea tends to bring into the mind its associated ideas, in accordance with the two great laws of association, the Law of Contiguity, and the Law of Similarity. Assumption, (assumo, to take for granted,) any proposition taken as the basis of argument; in a special sense, the minor premise of a categorical syllogism.

Attribute, (attribuo, to give or ascribe to,) a quality or circumstance which may be affirmed (or denied) of a thing; opposed to Substance, which see.

Attribute in grammar, 92 Attributive term, i. e. Connotative

term, 41

Axiom, defininition of, 125

Baconian method, 255; Philosophy, 229

Barbara, Celarent, &c., 145 Begging the Question, 179 Belief, assent to a proposition, admitting of any degree of strength, from the slightest probability to the fullest certainty; see Probability. Bentham, George, new system of Logic, 187

Boole, George, his system of Logic, 191; his Laws of Thought, 197; his logical works, 201

Canons of syllogism, 121-2; Hamilton's supreme Canon, 189 Canons of Mill's Inductive Methods, First, 240; Second, 242; Third, 245; Fourth, 252; Fifth, 249 Categorematic words, 18 Categorical propositions, 63 Categories, the summa genera, or most extensive classes into which things can be distributed; they are ten in number, as follows:

Ovơía, Substance ; Ilorov, Quan tity; Iotov, Quality; IIpós T, Relation; Ποιεῖν, Action; Πάσχειν, Passion, or suffering; IIoû, Place; Πότε, Time ; Κεῖσθαι, Position ; "Exew, Habit or condition.

Everything which can be affirmed must come under one or other of these highest predicates, which were described in the first treatise of Aristotle's Organon, called the Categories.

Cause, meaning of, 239

Aristotle distinguished four kinds of causes for the existence of a thing -1. The Material Cause, the substance or matter composing it; 2. The Formal Cause, the pattern, type or design, according to which it is shaped; 3. The Efficient Cause, the force employed in shaping it; 4. The Final Cause, the end, motive or purpose of the work.

Chance, ignorance of the causes which are in action; see Probability. Character, derivation of the word, 46

Characteristics, 285

Circulus in definiendo, 110, 114 Circulus in probando, 179 Clearness of knowledge, 54. Cognition, (cognosco, to know,) knowledge, or the action of mind in acquiring knowledge.

Colligation of Facts, Dr Whewell's expression for the mental union of facts by some suitable conception, see 286 Collective terms, 19

Combined or complete method of investigation, 258 Comparison, (com, together; par, equal or like,) the action of mind by which we judge whether two objects

« PreviousContinue »