« PreviousContinue »
der on the 20th of March following
more than what is necessary to give 1. A solicitor is bound to give evidence
due, and for preparing leases and ten. 2. A solicitor assisting his client in ob-
liable to costs if the principal be not
solvent, - - - - 227
3. Where plaintiff changes his solicitor,
there has been a taking of the goods stop him from proceeding until his
. 320 SPECIFIC EXECUTION.
goods wrongfully from B. and B. ap- suffers another person to become the
(rote) - 6 *. - 321solvency. O'Herlihy v. Hedges, 123
1. Suppression of deeds is tantamount to
spoliation, in respect of raising pre-
sumption against the party suppress-
ing. Bowles v. Stewart, . -. 209
See ÉQUITY, 5.
See PRACTICE, 15. "
STATUTE OF FRAUDS.
See AGREEMENTS, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 1. Where lands are devised in trust for
payment of debts, the statute of limi.
tationsruns not in equity after the death
of testator, against debts not barred
Fergus v. Gore, • - • 107
1. The rule that a trustee shall gain
" no benefit for himself,” shall not en-
title a cestui que trust to compel a
to execute an agreement made with
the trustee, and on the credit of his
2. All persons coming into possession of
property bound by a trust with notice
trustees, - - - - 262
3. Trustees and their representatives
are chargeable in equity for a breach
from it or not, -
4. Renewal of a lease taken by a trustee,
shall enure to the benefit of the cestui
que trust. Griffin v. Griffin, 352
notice, and takes a re-conveyance, it
6. So, if the person to whom he conveyed
ance the trust would attach, though it
did not attach on the person to whom
he conveyed : nor would have attach-
ed if that person had conveyed to ano.
time with a loan of money by lessce to
lessor, held fraudulent and void, as
affording to the lender, a profit on the
money lent, beyond legal interest.
sossion of the title deeds, - 223 applying to such transactions, it ought
to appear " that the lease was con- necting the loan with the lease moved
tracted for, wholly independent of, from the lessor. Molloy v. Irwin, 310
Power, (note) - - - 119
influence of loans of money made or
therefore void. Drew v. Power, 182 1. A quasi estate tail cannot be barred
the lease, . - . 191, 192 1. All wills to be proved shall be pro-
ed on principles of public policy; and officer, and delivered to the exami-
a loan of money by lessee to lessor, set See PRACTICE, 2, 3, 4.
F INI S.